首頁chrysanthemum
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候，都會拿寶騰 X70 同長城 哈弗 H6 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
長城 哈弗 H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價的確比長城 哈弗 H6 平咗 RM 32,950。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5 星 (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
長城 哈弗 H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同長城 哈弗 H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
長城 哈弗 H6 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶騰 X70 保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
長城 哈弗 H6 保修 7 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
寶騰 X70 同長城 哈弗 H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就選配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，寶騰 X70 同長城 哈弗 H6 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers often compare the Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-60 in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than the Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, the entry-level Proton can already meet daily needs. But be aware, that few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
The Mazda CX-60 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, the Mazda CX-60's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than the Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and will not feel underpowered.
The Proton X70 has a body length of 4400 mm and a trunk capacity of 400 L.
The Mazda CX-60 has a body length of 4500 mm and a trunk capacity of 450 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-60 body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X70, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-60 are excellent car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will compare them in detail from multiple aspects to save you the time of doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159. There are 2 versions in total, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand Ringgit savings might involve trade-offs in equipment, specifically depends on your needs.
Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating. In this class, safety features are quite comprehensive. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so don't worry too much about this.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X70, offering an advantage in seating space. However, Proton X70 is a bit more flexible for parking in the city. Each has its trade-offs.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to struggle with this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups about their experiences.
Overall, Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 作比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個角度做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Mazda CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154）等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價的確比 Mazda CX-5 平咗 RM 28,669。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平咗嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-5 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用咗同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都幾相似，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，後備箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-5 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取舍。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-5 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問吓真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
July 15, Denza brand officially launched its flagship pure electric shooting brake model — Denza Z9GT, in the Malaysian market. The new car's local official price is 358,800 Ringgit, equivalent to approximately 595,700 Yuan. This launch holds profound significance; Malaysia becomes the first Asia-Pacific overseas market in Denza Z9GT's layout, marking that Denza has completed a key move in the Southeast Asia high-end new energy segment, formally building a complete overseas product matrix.
Since officially entering the Malaysian market in February 2025, Denza relies on the local core dealer Sime Darby Group to launch flagship stores in Kuala Lumpur's core business district, steadily promoting the overseas market layout. The brand initially launched two main models: the luxury MPV Denza D9 and the high-end PHEV SUV Denza B8. Relying on mature three-electric technology, luxury cabin quality, and reliable product quality, they quickly established themselves in the local high-end new energy niche segment, accumulating a solid market reputation and user base.
As Denza's annual flagship model, Z9GT has already completed its domestic launch in March this year, gathering multiple top core technologies of the brand. The new car is equipped with e3 Intelligent Chassis Architecture, Second-generation Safety Blade Battery, Sky-Eye 5.0 Advanced Intelligent Driving System, and DiSus-A Intelligent Air Body Control System, with hardware configuration maxed out. In terms of range, the new car offers a maximum pure electric range of 1,036 kilometers, completely solving range anxiety for long-distance travel, combining ultimate performance, comfortable experience, and ultra-low energy consumption. It is a benchmark product of Denza's technology accumulation. Launching to the overseas market will further demonstrate China's new energy vehicle core manufacturing strength.
This time Denza Z9GT's entry successfully filled the brand's product gap in the high-performance luxury coupe field, allowing Denza to form a product layout covering three major categories: MPV, SUV, high-performance GT sedan in the Malaysian market, fully covering diverse scenarios of high-end home use, business reception, and performance travel, further improving brand market competitiveness.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-3 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
In terms of price, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 53,259 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version is already enough to meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, the Mazda CX-3's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than the Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features in this class are considered quite complete. New cars nowadays are not lacking in safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-3's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, offering better passenger space. However, Perodua Aruz is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz adopts FWD drive system.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ much.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-3 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the Perodua Aruz starting price is indeed RM 17,000 cheaper than the Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the cheaper price of a few thousand may involve compromises on features, depending on your specific requirements.
The Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The Honda WR-V safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New cars nowadays have good safety standards, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider prioritizing the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the model with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never go wrong.
車型概覽
標緻E-2008 GT 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講充電節奏同日常通勤，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
標緻E-2008 GT 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 436km Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 標緻E-2008 GT 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
標緻E-2008 GT 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
標緻E-2008 GT 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 標緻E-2008 GT 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「標緻 Peugeot E-2008 GT 充電要幾耐？」簡單講，使用 100kW 快充，標緻 Peugeot E-2008 GT 由 0% 充到 80% 只要約 30 分鐘。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 標緻E-2008 GT 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 標緻E-2008 GT 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
上汽大通V80露營車 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
上汽大通V80露營車 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2022 2.0T AMT版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 上汽大通V80露營車 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1996 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 139 Ps / 102 kW、330 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4950 mm、車闊 1998 mm、車高 2424 mm、軸距 3100 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 機械自動(AMT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
上汽大通V80露營車 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 上汽大通V80露營車 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「上汽大通 V80 露營車香港落地價約幾多？」簡單講，上汽大通 V80 露營車香港落地價約420,000–520,000 港元，視布局而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 上汽大通V80露營車 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 上汽大通V80露營車 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
Folks, today let's talk about big news on going global—not selling cars, but selling "drivers". On June 2, WeRide and Uber jointly announced a plan: to launch the country's first commercial Robotaxi pilot service in Madrid, Spain. In other words: Spanish residents will soon be able to hail a driverless taxi via Uber. This is the first time WeRide and Uber are partnering to enter the European market. Madrid also becomes the 12th city globally where WeRide's Robotaxi arrives.
According to official news, with the support of the Madrid regional government, this service will officially launch within this year. At that time, friends in Madrid can open the Uber App and call WeRide's Robotaxi with one click. It's just like calling an ordinary ride-hailing service, the difference is the arriving car has no driver—at least initially, there is still a difference. In the initial operation phase, a professionally trained safety monitor will be on board, as it's just launched, safety comes first.
This company, WeRide, you might have heard of it, or you might not. A brief introduction: Established in 2017, it has been dedicated to Robotaxi technology R&D and commercialization. Currently, its Robotaxis cover Guangzhou, Beijing, Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Riyadh, Zurich... plus Madrid now, totaling 12 cities. Spain is also the 5th European market WeRide has entered—previously entered Switzerland, France, Belgium, Slovakia. According to the plan agreed by WeRide and Uber in May 2025, they plan to deploy Robotaxi services in 15 new international cities within five years, deploying tens of thousands of Robotaxis globally. With the Madrid launch, the deployment in 4 cities has been completed, and 11 more will be covered successively before 2030.
To be honest, it's not the first time Chinese autonomous driving companies are going global, but the combination of Chinese technology + global mobility platform + European market is quite interesting. Madrid is one of the European Robotaxi markets with the most commercial potential, with a large population, high travel demand, and friendly local policies. Being able to take root in this market is a significant milestone for WeRide. For Uber, introducing Robotaxis is also a way to reduce costs—after all, drivers don't need salaries. For Madrid residents, hailing a taxi might be cheaper in the future.
