首頁abalone
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of GWM Haval H6 in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, that few thousand dollars cheaper might involve compromises in features, it depends on your needs.
The safety rating of Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of GWM Haval H6 is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of Proton X50 and the Basic of GWM Haval H6 have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
GWM Haval H6 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and GWM's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
GWM Haval H6 warranty 7 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one that is better equipped. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, hands-on experience is the most important.
In summary, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never be wrong.
当横跨欧亚的纯电车队驶入深圳湾畔，43天15000公里的丝路征程在深圳这座全球科创高地落下帷幕。七百五十年前，马可波罗踏上远行之路，开启了东西方文明的互通交融；今天，比亚迪的新能源汽车和闪充补能网络作为新丝路上的“科技使者”和“绿色驿站”，续写着“千年文明·万里闪充”的新篇章。
北京时间7月25日，在比亚迪全球总部，由知名经济学家Jeffrey D. Sachs（杰弗里·萨克斯）教授与M31资本创始管理合伙人仲雷共同发起的马可波罗之旅迎来完美收官。这场以新能源绿色科技重走千年丝绸之路的行动，在深圳的创新土壤上沉淀为跨越文明的可持续发展共识。当古老丝路的互通精神与当代绿色科技深度融合，新时代的文明对话有了更坚实的依托与更广阔的全球视野。
收官当日，“科技引领 共创未来”青年论坛在南方科技大学举办，本次论坛汇聚了知名学者、科创企业家、高校学子，打造了科技与中西方文化交融的高质量对话，启发青年思考，赋能人才发展。深圳市委宣传部相关领导在致辞中表示，本次马可波罗之旅与APEC“互联互通、共生共赢”的内核、以及我国一带一路倡议的理念高度契合。以比亚迪为代表的深圳本土科技企业，也正以开放包容的姿态链接全球市场。
在主旨演讲环节，全球知名经济学家、哥伦比亚大学教授Jeffrey D. Sachs回顾了比亚迪重走马可波罗之路的旅程，认为这不仅是一次技术实测，更是一场文明对话，高度认可比亚迪为世界的互联互通及可持续发展作出的卓越贡献；同时为“深圳-香港-广州”创新集群首次登顶《2025年全球创新指数》百强创新集群的成就，和中国一带一路倡议的前瞻理念和务实推进点赞。
华大集团首席执行官尹烨，立足生命科学前沿发展，探讨AI浪潮下人才培育与可持续发展。他提出，随着生命医学突破，人类百岁时代正向我们走来，寄语青年勇于探索拼搏，把握时代机遇。
随后的圆桌对话环节，比亚迪集团董事会秘书、首席投资官李黔结合企业全球化布局谈到，比亚迪进入全球100多个国家的实践证明，真正的技术领先不是对市场的单向赋能，而是打造可持续发展的科技生态链和人才链。速腾聚创首席执行官邱纯潮回顾了团队从校园科研到在新能源产业浪潮中实现高速的成长跨越，同时也分享了面向AI时代，为物理智能世界做技术底座的前瞻战略。南方科技大学孟庆虎院士从深圳的科创基因切入，认为深圳的优势，不在于单一产业的领先，更在于构建了从高校人才培养、基础研究突破到产业孵化落地的完整闭环，这种创新生态是支撑深圳科技走向世界的底层逻辑。
Jeffrey D. Sachs教授强调，合作共赢是全球经济与科技创新可持续发展的重要共识。M31资本创始管理合伙人仲雷提出，新时代的丝路不仅是地理上的线性通道，更是以科技创新和文明对话为纽带的全球协作网络，深圳作为这个网络的东方枢纽，发挥着至关重要的作用。
未来，比亚迪将继续立足深圳、链接全球，持续以技术创新搭建中西方对话的桥梁，续写丝路互通共生的新故事，助力全球可持续发展。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-5 in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 45,669 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive mode.
Mazda CX-5 adopts FWD drive mode.
Proton's 4WD and Mazda's FWD will feel different in handling, test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, recommend asking real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
Proton X50 and Mazda CX-5 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on homework will never be wrong.
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Mazda CX-5 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 135,469 - 166,760, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary (RM 316,154), 2025 2.0L AT (RM 296,154), 2025 2.0L MT (RM 294,154), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 62,569 cheaper than Mazda CX-5. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, keep in mind that the few thousand difference, there might be trade-offs in specifications, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-5 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-5's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel like there's not enough power.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-5 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-5's body is 100 mm longer than Perodua Aruz, with more advantage in seating space. However, Perodua Aruz is a bit more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-5 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and part prices. Suggest asking real owners in car owner groups for experience.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-5 are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda WR-V 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋會從多個方面做詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅入手價確實比 Honda WR-V 平咗 RM 17,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Honda WR-V 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常行開嘅感覺基本上冇分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda WR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Malaysia's four-year electric vehicle import tax exemption policy has officially ended. The new regulations implemented on July 1 directly tightened the entry threshold for imported electric vehicles. Regarding complete vehicle imports, the new regulations require that the CIF price of all CBU electric vehicles must not be lower than 200,000 Ringgit (approximately 320,000 RMB), and the motor output power must not be lower than 180 kW (about 241 hp). Both conditions must be met simultaneously; neither can be missing.
Relying on the previously relaxed environment, Chinese brands once captured 60% of the new energy vehicle market share in Malaysia. Now, the local market intends to replicate the industrialization model of local automakers, forcing foreign investment to shift from complete vehicle trading to local manufacturing. After all, no one wants to be just a dumping ground for goods.
Electric Vehicle New Policy Heavy Implementation in July
After the four-year electric vehicle import tariff exemption period ends, Malaysia significantly tightened complete vehicle import rules, upgrading the previously duty-free 100,000 Ringgit CIF threshold to a mandatory 200,000 Ringgit entry baseline, while rigidly binding a 180 kW motor power lower limit; both conditions are indispensable. Previously, the 100,000 Ringgit was only the tariff exemption line, the price point perfectly fit the pricing system of main home-use models going overseas, BYD Dolphin, entry-level Atto 3, and other volume-selling models relied on cost advantages during the tax exemption period, becoming core products for Chinese brands to seize the local market.
After the CIF price is raised to 200,000 Ringgit, adding import tariffs, domestic sales tax, and dealer markups, estimated based on the current tax and fee structure of the Malaysian automotive market, the final vehicle price will reach above 300,000 Ringgit, converting to RMB, it is close to 480,000. Most Malaysian households' car purchasing budgets are in the range of 100,000 to 250,000 Ringgit, this price range of 300,000 Ringgit is a niche market where Tesla and BBA pure electric models have already dug deep, there are very few models domestically that can cross both rigid thresholds, the price-friendly family car base that Chinese brands originally stabilized via pure import routes is essentially locked by the policy; while vehicles assembled locally via CKD can still legally cover the mainstream family consumption price range of 100,000 to 250,000 Ringgit.
Many brands can choose to rent existing local factories for knocked-down assembly production, Leapmotor uses Stellantis idle production lines to launch C10, Xpeng partners with local manufacturers to launch right-hand drive G6, by reusing existing capacity to avoid the strict clauses of 80% mandatory export for new factories, this is the easiest flexible method to implement at present. However, this light-asset OEM model has many hidden dangers from the perspective of long-term industrial layout.
Car companies do not own production lines, unable to independently expand production schedules during peak order surges, production line modifications for model updates are also subject to the partner's will, the production rhythm is hard to control completely by themselves. More critically, core components like batteries, electronic controls still rely on being shipped separately from domestic sources, localization only stays at the final process. Referencing Indonesia's practice of continuously raising local component ratios, the local 2030 target for new energy vehicle local component penetration rate is set at 80%, the overall industrial orientation in Southeast Asia is forcing upstream supply chains to land locally, the model of only simple assembly will eventually face policy constraints.
Moreover, this detour route itself has no permanent guarantee at the legal level, Malaysia can update industrial regulations at any time later, including existing factory cooperation projects into export quota supervision, this shortcut could be tightened or blocked at any moment. The export strategy of only doing trade output and unwilling to deeply bind local industrial chains has no more sustainable space.
Chinese Automakers Face Major Differentiation
Geely Holdings is the biggest indirect beneficiary of this round of policies. Geely holds 49.9% of shares in Malaysia's traditional state-owned automaker Proton, and Proton itself holds original CKD production qualifications, it does not belong to the new foreign investment factory construction projects approved after September 2025. This means the strictest 80% mandatory export quota in the new regulations cannot constrain Proton from the start. Proton has no ratio restrictions on sales in the local market, and can long-term enjoy policy inclinations for local component support, effectively standing in the safe zone by nature within the environment of tightening policies.
In addition, Xpeng Motors relies on EPMB's existing factory in Melaka State to carry out CKD complete knocked-down assembly, Leapmotor uses Stellantis's own complete vehicle factory located in Kulim, Kedah, Malaysia for local assembly. Both types of projects belong to reusing existing local capacity, and can be exempted from the requirement of 80% mandatory export quota in the new regulations.
While BYD's wholly-owned new factory planned in Perak State, Chery's new industrial park planned in Selangor State, both belong to new manufacturing projects approved after September 2025, will be strictly constrained by the 80% export quota; brands like Great Wall Motors relying on pure imports of affordable models, directly face the impact of losing the access qualification for main models.
The core logic of the new regulations is actually setting up a double barrier for "new foreign players", clearly not welcoming foreign enterprises that only focus on building capacity in the local market. The remaining options for foreign brands are very limited: either introduce high-end models via pure import routes, giving up the mainstream volume market; or rent existing local production lines for knocked-down assembly, production capacity rhythm and cost control are all subject to others, hard to form scaled price competitiveness.
Viewing the entire Southeast Asian market dimension, this logic is not unfamiliar. Thailand and Indonesia's industrial policy directions have been highly consistent in the past two years: the threshold for complete vehicle imports continues to rise, the core conditions for market access are gradually shifting from product competitiveness to the depth of localization investment.
In early years, when most Chinese electric vehicle brands first entered Southeast Asia, they followed a typical trade route: controlling costs by relying on the scale advantages of the domestic supply chain, and rapidly distributing goods after complete vehicles are shipped by sea, relying on price differences, most stayed at the superficial cooperation stage of "selling products". However, a few brands like Geely have already completed deep localization layout through the method of investing in local car companies.
Now, the demands of ASEAN core markets have shifted from "richening consumption choices" to "driving local industrial upgrades", the exchange chips for market access have also changed from pure product power to capacity landing, technology transfer, and supply chain driving capabilities. Brands that only do commodity output and are unwilling to do industrial binding will sooner or later be squeezed into niche peripheral markets by gradually tightening rules.
In other words, the export 1.0 stage relying purely on complete vehicle distribution has reached its end in the Southeast Asian market.
Consumer Car Review
Actually, the screening logic of the Southeast Asian market has never changed: It welcomes co-builders who bring the industrial chain, not passersby who only sell products. When rules tighten step by step, the winning hand of going overseas has long shifted from product costs, pricing strategies, to the ability to predict industrial rules, and the depth of layout rooted in the local area.
After all, a model without an industrial anchor point will ultimately not go far.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 馬自達 CX-30 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 來做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，馬自達 CX-30 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 1,341。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
馬自達 CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開起嚟嘅感覺基本無分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
馬自達 CX-30 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-30 嘅車身比 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆少少，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
馬自達 CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，馬自達 CX-30 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
7月6日，零跑汽车正式宣布进入墨西哥市场，首款车型B10完成本土化认证并启动交付。这标志着零跑成为首个叩开北美市场大门的中国新势力品牌。
从2025年开启全球化元年，到如今覆盖全球超40个国家和地区、布局超2000家销售服务网点，零跑用不到三年时间，走完了传统车企需要十年才能走完的全球化之路。
从50万辆到150万辆：一场加速度的全球远征
零跑的全球化速度，在数据上体现得淋漓尽致。
截至2026年6月18日，零跑全球累计交付量突破150万辆。
更值得关注的是交付加速度：第一个50万辆用了64个月，第二个50万辆缩短至12个月，而第三个50万辆仅用时8个月。从64个月到8个月，这是一条陡然抬升的增长曲线。
图片来源：零跑汽车
海外市场成为这条曲线的核心驱动力。2025年，零跑海外销量达6.7万辆，位居中国新势力品牌出口首位。
进入2026年，出海势头进一步加速：5月单月海外出口超2万辆，1至5月累计出口超7.5万辆，已超过2025年全年出口总量。
6月，零跑全球交付量达93376辆，同比增长95%，再创单月历史新高。海外销量占比从2025年的约15%提升至接近25%。
在欧洲这一核心市场，零跑的表现尤为抢眼。
2026年第一季度，零跑在欧洲16国上牌量达2.33万辆，同比增长726.5%；在欧盟12个国家的纯电动车销量约1.7万辆，位居中国纯电品牌首位。
在意大利，零跑已成为纯电市场的绝对领导者——5月单月上牌量达4765辆，市占率攀升至34.5%，私人渠道市占率高达48%。“在意大利，每卖出三辆纯电动车，就有一辆来自零跑”。
渠道网络的快速铺开为销量增长提供了支撑。
目前零跑业务已覆盖全球40余个国家和地区，全球渠道网点突破2000家，其中海外网点超过950家。德国市场一年多时间落地超100家门店，成为近年来德国市场增长最快的汽车品牌之一。
在产品层面，零跑的全球化战略车型矩阵正加速落地。
6月18日，零跑Lafa5右舵版在香港及全球上市，首批登陆欧洲26个国家和地区，8月还将进军澳大利亚和新西兰市场。这是零跑继T03、C10、B10之后向海外推出的第四款车型。
零跑高级副总裁徐军明确表示，零跑A、B、C、D四个平台的车型都将向全球推广。A10计划2026年底或2027年初进入欧洲市场——一个覆盖轿车、SUV、MPV全品类的全球化产品矩阵正在成型。
“借船出海”到“造船出海”：轻资产模式下的本地化深潜
零跑的全球化路径，区别于传统车企独立开拓海外市场的模式。
2023年，零跑与全球第四大汽车集团Stellantis达成合作，成立合资公司“零跑国际”，由Stellantis持股51%、零跑持股49%，独家负责零跑在大中华区以外的全球市场销售与生产。
这一“轻资产”模式，让零跑得以借助Stellantis在全球的成熟渠道与商业资源，以极低的资本投入快速完成全球布局。
图片来源：零跑汽车
这一模式的成效已经在经营层面得到验证——零跑国际在成立第二年即实现年度盈利。海外市场毛利率稳定在18%至20%区间，明显高于国内市场水平。
2026年一季度，零跑海外出口达40901辆，营收108.2亿元，创历史同期新高。
但零跑的野心远不止于“借船出海”。从2026年开始，零跑正在从“出口”转向“本地化制造”，从“借船”走向“造船”。
在欧洲，零跑与Stellantis的合作已进入深水区。
2026年5月，双方宣布深化战略合作。零跑B10计划于2026年四季度在西班牙萨拉戈萨工厂以CKD模式启动生产。6月23日，零跑国际在西班牙落成电池组装车间，规划年产能约6.5万套，并预留扩容至10万套的空间。
更深远的是，双方拟将马德里比利亚韦德工厂所有权转让给零跑国际，用于投产全新车型。
在欧洲之外，零跑的本地化布局同样迅速。
马来西亚吉打州古伦工厂于2026年6月正式启动本地组装业务；缅甸仰光工厂于2026年3月实现首台B10下线。零跑计划最终实现国内生产占40%、海外生产占60%的产能结构。
最新登陆的墨西哥市场，则是零跑本地化能力的集中体现。
零跑B10在进入墨西哥前，已在Stellantis墨西哥汽车工程研发测试中心完成超过一年的本土化适配验证，针对高原、沙漠、雨林等复杂地形与气候进行专属调校。
渠道方面，依托Stellantis在墨西哥的本地化网络，已在核心城市布局超40家授权网点；售后由拥有超85年行业经验的服务商Mopar提供支持，位于托卢卡的配件配送中心占地45000平方米，常备50000余种原厂配件，可实现24至48小时内配送至各地门店。
零跑创始人朱江明曾这样定义出海的真义：“海外业务已成为零跑的‘第二增长引擎’，我们追求的不再是单纯的整车出口，而是全球落地'品牌+制造+服务'的全生命周期。”
从150万辆的交付里程碑，到ABCD全矩阵产品的全球铺开；从“借船出海”的轻资产起步，到西班牙、马来西亚、墨西哥的本地化制造落地——零跑正在用不到三年的时间，完成一场从中国新势力到世界级智能电动车企的蜕变。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volkswagen Golf GTI 同 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細對比，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 256,962 - 256,962，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Sepang Edition（RM 262,990）、2025 2.0T Standard（RM 256,962）、DCT（RM 219,800） 等。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 363,888 - 363,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 E 200 Avantgarde（RM 350,000）、E 300 AMG Line（RM 400,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Volkswagen Golf GTI 嘅入門價確實比 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 平咗 RM 106,926。如果你預算有限，Volkswagen 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但亦要留意，平咗幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 嘅安全评分係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 嘅安全评分係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都幾唔錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz E-Class 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Volkswagen Golf GTI 同 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Volkswagen Golf GTI 同 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會比較 Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross。今日我哋由多個角度詳細比較下，幫你省翻做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等等。
Chery Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等等。
從價錢睇，Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 18,050。實話講，喺呢個價級，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體性價比同長期使用成本。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都揾到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo Cross 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後總係建議兩部車都去試下，親身體驗先至最重要。
總嚟講，Proton X70 同 Chery Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試車做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
