首頁Porsche Taycan Turbo
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶騰 X70 同起亞 Sportage 做比較。兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省番做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
起亞 Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，合共 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639） 等。
從價錢來看，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價確實比起亞 Sportage 平咗 RM 22,839。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備方面會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
起亞 Sportage 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩部車用咗同一套動力系統，日常行車嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
起亞 Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
起亞 Sportage 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩部車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
寶騰 X70 同起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X70 同起亞 Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一部，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 50,850 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand dollar difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily driving in the city, both cars have sufficient power, and you won't feel underpowered.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with more configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is most important.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都將 Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X70 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等等。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價的確比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 33,900。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車廂空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
由價錢睇返，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 61,250。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體睇返你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Perodua Ativa 嘅 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
[Lead: Avatr has obtained the L3 road test license, which means it belongs to the first echelon of the Huawei cooperation system in the high-end intelligent driving field. However, at the same time, sales on the market side are under pressure, the second IPO push, and brand integration is imminent, Avatr is in a state of ice and fire where "technical strengths and resource strengths" coexist with "commercial weaknesses".]
Author: Cai Yan
Early July, Avatr announced it has obtained the L3-level autonomous driving test license. Relying on Huawei ADS high-end intelligent driving system, Avatr will conduct intelligent driving road tests up to 120 km/h on open roads in Chongqing, and plans to launch mass-produced models equipped with L3 functions in the second half of 2026.
The progress Avatr has made in L3 intelligent driving marks that the brand's high-end intelligent driving technology has officially moved from R&D to the field test phase. It is expected to become a key lever for the brand to break through industry involution and reverse the current low sales situation.
Recently, the updated prospectus submitted by Avatr to the HKEX disclosed another set of data. Avatr's cumulative deliveries from January to May 2026 were only 20,160 units, averaging less than 4,032 units per month, a year-over-year decline of over 50%. If including the 7,459 units delivered in June, the half-year delivery only accounted for 12.5% of the annual target (220,000 units).
At the same period, even though the domestic automotive market as a whole is under continuous pressure with monthly and cumulative sales showing double-digit year-over-year decline, the overall decline in the new energy market was about 15%. However, specifically in the "New EV Brands, Second-Gen Startups" niche segment, the monthly sales threshold for top new EV brands has long broken 30,000 units. Harmony Intelligent Mobility Alliance's monthly sales are stable at around 50,000 units, and Leapmotor is leading by a leapfrog margin.
IM Motors, which is in the same competitive ecosystem position as Avatr, also achieved sales of 31,000 units from January to May 2026, a year-over-year increase of 114%. It is worth noting that IM's 2025 performance was not as good as Avatr.
Avatr is at a node full of contradictions. The L3 license is a proof of Avatr's technical strength, but it cannot cover a cruel reality: In terms of brand positioning and sales, Avatr, after a brief surge, is still under pressure.
High Opening, Low Closing
As one of the automotive brands born with luxury resources among "Second-Gen Startups", Avatr combines Changan Vehicle Manufacturing, Huawei High-end Intelligent Driving, and CATL Battery Power core capabilities. The three giants' combined support made the CHN Model once a benchmark sample for high-end car manufacturing.
Since deliveries began in December 2022, total deliveries increased from 20,000 units in 2023 to the brand's peak in 2025.
Full-year 2025 deliveries reached 122,700 units, December's single-month sales reached 10,400 units, achieving 10 consecutive months of sales exceeding 10,000. Full-year revenue reached 25.631 billion Yuan, a year-over-year increase of 68.7%, and gross margin was 9.4%. Revenue from 2023 to 2025 also grew, Avatr's cumulative revenue over three years was approximately 46.5 billion Yuan, with an annual compound growth rate over 113%. Revenue grew 4.5 times in three years, with vehicle business revenue growing approximately 4.3 times over three years.
Avatr's brand has experienced 3 years of growth. Relying on a set of luxury resources, it indeed captured good book data, but digging deeper reveals that at this stage, Avatr's sales scale has never covered the losses. Avatr openly stated in the prospectus: "It may continue to record net losses for the year ended December 31, 2026".
More critically, comparing Avatr's two IPO prospectus submissions, the initial prospectus showed a gross margin of 10.1% and revenue of 12.208 billion Yuan for the first half of 2025. However, in the latest prospectus, despite revenue growth year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter in the second half, the gross margin decreased (9.4%), further indicating a decline in profitability.
The key reason behind Avatr's revenue surge and continuous losses lies in: brand perception and market size.
First is brand perception. From 2022 to 2023, China's new energy products were shifting from scale expansion to quality upgrade. At that time, Avatr supported by the three giants was indeed "having traffic, having strength, and having uniqueness". When Avatr was first established, fewer than 5 companies had Huawei's technical support.
Unfortunately, at the beginning of the brand's launch, Avatr did not have a high opening and strong closing, but instead adopted the pragmatic style of traditional brands, thus missing the best communication node.
Since 2024, with more and more car companies embracing Huawei, Avatr's unique narrative of "China's Automotive Industry Second Generation" was quickly leveled by "Five Worlds Three Realms".
Taking this L3 road test as an example, GAC and Huawei ADS' Qijing GT7 also obtained Guangzhou L3-level autonomous driving road test permission. In this way, under the same situation of Qijing GT7 being equipped with Huawei intelligent driving, Avatr finds it difficult to obtain "scarcity".
Recently, data released at the 2026 Huawei ADS Technology Conference showed that by April, Huawei ADS cooperative brands exceeded 25, and mass-produced models equipped with Huawei ADS exceeded 50.
This situation is not limited to intelligent driving technology. Last year, CATL officially announced that Avatr issued the first batch of Xiaoyao Super Extended-Range Hybrid Batteries. Within a few months, some automakers followed suit with supporting equipment, including same-level competitors like Smart Driving R7.
People remember Huawei's intelligent driving and CATL's batteries, but they cannot remember the Avatr brand itself. Even though Avatr has the advantage of "first batch adoption" and is a "Yuanwang Shareholder", Avatr has not yet established clear market brand perception, which is a more serious problem than losses.
In short, what Avatr lacks is not technology, but the reason of "Irreplaceable".
Especially in the most competitive price range of 200,000 to 400,000 Yuan at this stage, whether it is Zeekr, AITO, Tesla, Xiaomi, or NIO, XPeng, as long as these brands are mentioned, consumers can clearly associate what the brand's core selling point is, while Avatr is blurred.
Regarding design, Avatr has good original design, which can indeed move some young consumers' hearts, but in the high-end market, aesthetics and design can only be a stepping stone. Regarding intelligent driving, models equipped with the full suite of Huawei ADS on the market are so numerous they are countable, and even priced lower than Avatr. Regarding batteries, consumers usually only remember the brand, not the specific battery model. Today, consumers in China's 200,000 to 400,000 Yuan range have been trained with a car selection model. They need differentiation and uniqueness, not a simple "Giant Mix".
Multi-faceted Adjustments
Regarding the impact of sales scale, Avatr admitted in the prospectus: "Relatively small procurement volumes limit our bargaining power with parts suppliers".
Changan announced in April this year strategic integration of Avatr and Deepal Auto. Deepal and Avatr will achieve deep synergy in R&D, procurement, supply chain, channels, and multiple dimensions, ultimately achieving a reduction in comprehensive operating costs by 20%-30%.
Of course, integration is not limited to cost reduction. How to guarantee the independence and differentiation of two brands, and how to solve problems such as Avatr's core competitiveness not being internally diluted in the future, will be Changan's core challenge. Currently, on the market, Lynk & Co and Zeekr under Geely are good templates for medium-end and high-end brand segmentation.
It is worth mentioning that Avatr is already quite effective in going overseas and channel levels.
In 2025, Avatr's overseas revenue increased from 223 million Yuan to 1.398 billion Yuan, revenue ratio increased to 5.5%. By the end of 2025, Avatr had laid out over 80 sales outlets in 38 countries and regions. Among them, Avatr 11 has long held the top rank in luxury electric vehicles in Thailand, occupying 10% market share in high-end electric vehicles in the UAE.
Regarding channels, Avatr started channel transformation in May 2024. Most stores have now告别 pure self-operated models, retaining only a few direct stores in core first-tier cities. The effect of channel adjustments is immediate. Distributor revenue ratio jumped from 1.1% in 2023 to 49.2% in 2025. More critically, sales efficiency significantly improved. Avatr's 2025 sales expenses only increased by 240 million Yuan, but leveraged 10.4 billion Yuan in revenue growth.
In the second half of this year, Avatr's new car sales, L3 commercialization, overseas expansion progress, and whether listing can proceed smoothly, these are all core variables for Avatr's breakthrough.
Comment
At this stage, the most realistic problem Avatr needs to face, holding 11.5 billion Yuan joint venture equity, obtaining L3 test license, promoting brand integration, etc., are all "tactical bonus points". The real lifeline is still the deepening of "Brand Storytelling". After all, the scariest thing for a brand is having no strategy, only tactics. Brand building has never had shortcuts. Currently, Avatr's direction has been clearly adjusted, and actions have been launched. The rest is left to time and products.
(This article is original to "He Yan Yue Che", no reprinting without authorization)
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 來比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409）等等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅入門價確係比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 59,909。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以應付日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩部車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級距入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩部車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
總括嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部車，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都好慣將 Perodua Ativa 同 Honda HR-V 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起跳價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 53,400。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda HR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Ativa 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更介意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿寶馬 5 系列同賓士 C-Class AMG 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶馬 5 系列喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 340,800 - 407,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 520i Sport（RM 320,000）、530e M Sport（RM 380,000） 等。
賓士 C-Class AMG 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 443,888 - 443,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 C 200 Avantgarde（RM 260,000）、C 300 AMG Line（RM 310,000） 等。
從價錢睇，寶馬 5 系列嘅起步價確實比賓士 C-Class AMG 平咗 RM 103,088。如果你預算有限，寶馬嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都需要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶馬 5 系列嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括。
賓士 C-Class AMG 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全晒。而家嘅新車安全性都不錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶馬 5 系列採用 FWD 驅動方式。
賓士 C-Class AMG 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
寶馬 5 系列保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
賓士 C-Class AMG 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
寶馬 5 系列同賓士 C-Class AMG 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，寶馬 5 系列同賓士 C-Class AMG 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊架，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都拿 BMW 5 Series 同 Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
BMW 5 系列喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 340,800 - 407,800，合共 2 個版本，包括 520i Sport（RM 320,000）、530e M Sport（RM 380,000） 等。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 443,888 - 443,888，合共 2 個版本，包括 C 200 Avantgarde（RM 260,000）、C 300 AMG Line（RM 310,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，BMW 5 系列嘅起步價的確比 Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 平咗 RM 103,088。如果你預算有限，BMW 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
BMW 5 系列搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 嘅 3.0L Turbo 比 BMW 5 系列嘅 2.0L Turbo 多咗 130 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
BMW 5 系列車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
BMW 5 系列採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
BMW 5 系列保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，BMW 5 系列同 Mercedes-Benz C-Class AMG 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Mazda CX-8 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 做比較。今日我哋由多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫您省下做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢睇落，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅起步價比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 5,610。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda CX-8 嘅 Brand ADAS 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mazda CX-8 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微闊綽啲，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放手推車，大少少嘅車身的確更實用。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-8 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Mazda CX-80 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-80 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 296,610 - 296,610，合共 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.5L 65km High Plus（RM 296,610） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，合共 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅起價比 Mazda CX-80 平咗 RM 136,860。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Mazda CX-80 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-80 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 多咗 50 匹馬力，中段加速會更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。但 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅油耗表現可能會更好，日常市區通勤嘅話差別唔會太明顯。
Mazda CX-80 車身長 4500 mm，後尾箱 450 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，後尾箱 400 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-80 嘅車身比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腿部空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大啲嘅車身確實更加實用。
Mazda CX-80 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Mazda CX-80 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。而家我哋由多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省返做功課嘅時間。
Volvo XC60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 328,888 - 328,888，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2025 2.0T Core（RM 328,888） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
由價錢睇，Subaru Forester 嘅起價比 Volvo XC60 平咗 RM 154,888。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Volvo XC60 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Subaru Forester 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Volvo XC60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Volvo XC60 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
【CNMO科技消息】6月30日，香港联交所网站披露，阿维塔科技已完成香港联交所主板挂牌上市申请资料的更新与递交。同日，香港联交所网站刊登了本次发行上市的更新申请资料。
阿维塔
CNMO科技注意到，自2021年成立以来，阿维塔在长安汽车、华为、宁德时代三家行业巨头的深度赋能下，快速构建起覆盖研产供销运的全价值链核心能力。目前，阿维塔已推出阿维塔11、阿维塔12、阿维塔07、阿维塔06、阿维塔06T等多款量产车型，以及阿维塔011、阿维塔012两款限量版车型，售价覆盖20-70万元区间。
招股书更新数据显示，阿维塔2025年销量突破12万台，同比实现接近翻倍增长；全年营收达256.31亿元，同比增长68.7%。毛利自2024年首次转正后，2025年进一步扩增至24.17亿元，毛利率升至9.4%，盈利能力稳步增强；经营性现金流亦于2024年转正，2025年持续扩大至23.15亿元，盈利质量同步改善。阿维塔于2025年以115亿元战略入股引望、持有10%股权，首年即实现正向投资收益，2025年分占联营公司利润1.82亿元，为长期价值增长开辟新空间。
海外方面，阿维塔正加速向全球市场拓展。2025年海外收入13.98亿元，收入占比达5.5%；海外市场平均售价超30万元，以高价值出海实现盈利。截至2025年12月31日，阿维塔已在东南亚、中东非、欧亚、中南美等38个国家和地区布局超80个销售网点，并计划于2026年正式进军欧洲市场。2026年1至5月海外销量较2025年同期增长33.4%；截至5月31日，海外市场已拓展至43个国家和地区，分销网点增至95个。
阿维塔07L
展望未来，阿维塔将加速产品扩容，覆盖中大型及大型SUV等增长强劲的细分市场，计划于2026年三季度发布智美大五座豪华SUV阿维塔07L，并于年内推出旗舰大六座SUV。同时，依托与引望的深度联合共创，阿维塔后续车型将全面搭载新一代智能化技术，并成为首批采用华为乾崑下一代辅助驾驶系统的品牌。海外拓展方面，阿维塔计划于2030年进入超110个国家和地区，以本地化产品与服务体系把握海外高端市场增长机遇。
