首頁Mercedes C-Class
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But note also that the lower cost may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Honda CR-V body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, passenger space is more advantageous. However Proton X90 parking in the city is a bit more flexible, each has trade-offs.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive method.
Honda CR-V adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars' drive methods are the same, both are FWD, daily driving feel won't have big difference.
Both Proton X90 and Honda CR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Honda CR-V are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their homework, compare quotes from multiple dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
如果你认识smart的时间不算长，脑海里的smart印象，大概率会是近些年新出的精灵#1、精灵#5：精致、尺寸克制但空间尚可，日常也能承担一家人的出行。
可smart最早出名，靠的是一台完全不同的车。
1998年，第一代smart fortwo问世，它只有两扇门、两个座位，车身短到在欧洲街头甚至能横着停进车位。后来大家习惯把这类车叫“城市小车”“微型车”，fortwo则早早把这套玩法摆到了全世界面前——两门两座、四轮四角、小尺寸里尽可能多留乘员空间，这些后来在微型车上频繁出现的思路，都能从它身上找到影子。
时隔28年，这个经典形态重新回到了smart的产品线。
全新smart精灵2号最近完成了工信部申报，量产版外观和部分基础参数也随之公开。今年10月，它还会回到巴黎，在巴黎车展完成全球首秀。
而正式露面前，smart先把这台车画上了上海、柏林、巴黎、香港、布宜诺斯艾利斯和墨尔本的街头。六座城市、六组涂鸦，挺符合这个品牌一直以来的调性，因为自诞生开始，它就不是一个特别循规蹈矩的汽车品牌。
看到申报图，熟悉fortwo的人应该不会陌生。
车身依旧相当短，全长根据不同选装为2751mm和2764mm，宽1669mm，高1555mm，轴距1875mm。前悬最短475mm，后悬最短401mm，车轮基本被推到了车身四角。
不到2.8米是什么概念？现在很多主流纯电小车都已经奔着3.5米甚至4米去了，精灵2号依然守着fortwo那种“小到极致”的感觉。两个座位当然谈不上照顾全家，可在城市里钻巷子、找车位、掉头，这种尺寸带来的轻松感，很难靠配置表描述。
造型也没有照搬老车。
车身轮廓还能看到fortwo留下来的影子，前脸、灯组和曲面处理已经明显属于现在的smart。申报信息里还能看到黑色车顶、车身同色车顶、多款轮圈、前后装饰件、不同字标等选装内容。对于这种小车来说，个性化本来就占了购买理由里不小的一块。
另外，不计成本专为微型车开发架构这事，应该也只有smart干得出来了，精灵2号使用smart全球研发团队针对超紧凑型纯电车型开发的ECA电动紧凑型架构。从空间布局开始就围绕两座小车展开，动力总成、电池、乘员舱都要在不到2.8米的长度里重新安排。官方给这套架构定下的思路也很直白：尽量少占地方，多把空间留给人。
fortwo过去很有代表性的后置后驱布局，也延续到了全新精灵2号身上。
16英寸轮胎版本采用前185/50 R16、后205/45 R16的前窄后宽搭配。前轮负责转向，后轮更宽，配合后置后驱，对抓地力和车身姿态都会有帮助，这里我直接给大家一个参数，微型车，但最高时速140km/h，没错了，有且只有smart能干出这事来！
目前公开的三电信息还不算多，但可以确认的是，新车采用磷酸铁锂电池，电芯来自宁德时代，不过电池容量、续航以及电机具体参数还要等后续公布。
安全部分也沿用了smart很有代表性的思路。过去fortwo那套Tridion Cell高强度安全座舱，是很多人认识smart车身结构的起点。到了全新精灵2号，smart围绕ECA架构重新开发新一代整车安全体系，小车尺寸没有给车身安全省掉功课。
写在最后
坦白讲，今天的纯电小车已经很多了，而且越做越成熟。五门、四座、更长续航、更低价格，日常代步几乎什么需求都有人照顾。沿着这条路继续做，smart当然也可以造一台很标准的小型纯电车。可那样的车，市场上已经有很多。
精灵2号选择继续保留两个座位、不到2.8米的车身、后置后驱、四轮四角，再专门为它开发一套纯电架构，多少有点“费力不讨巧”，也正因为如此，它才很像过去那台fortwo。
这些年，精灵#1、精灵#3让smart拥有了更宽的产品覆盖面，也让这个品牌走进更多普通家庭的购车清单。精灵2号回来以后，产品线里又多了一台非常挑人的车：后排没有，装载空间有限，尺寸小得极端，很多人从第一眼就知道自己需不需要它。
fortwo当年也是这样，喜欢的人，会觉得它停在哪里都很可爱，城市里开着特别顺手；没需求的人，大概从来不会把它列进候选名单。它存在了这么多年，靠的恰恰就是这种鲜明。
28年过去，汽车已经变了很多，smart也早已不是当年的smart。
好在那台两门两座的小车，又回到了街头，往后你在街上看到它的时候，你大概还是会很自然地叫出那个名字：哦（第四声），smart！
营收三年翻倍、量产规模已经跑起来，但盈利、客户集中度和现金流，才是上市后真正需要回答的三道题。
8月7日，拿森科技登陆港交所。最终发售价10.42港元，香港公开发售部分获得约2513.54倍认购，首日开盘较发行价上涨约62%。
“智能驾驶+线控底盘+国产替代”，资本市场显然给了热度。
但招股书里的另一组数字更值得看：2023年至2025年，拿森科技营收从2.72亿元增至3.91亿元、6.15亿元，三年超过翻倍；同期净亏损分别约2.01亿元、1.70亿元和1.90亿元。2026年一季度，营收继续同比增长46.9%至1.51亿元，净亏损约5488万元。
上市之后，拿森真正要回答的问题已经变了：不是产品能不能卖出去，而是规模什么时候能变成利润和现金。
拿森核心业务之一是线控制动。大白话讲，就是智能驾驶系统发出“减速”指令后，真正负责把电子指令变成制动力的执行系统。
招股书援引灼识咨询数据称，按2025年销量计算，拿森线控制动解决方案销量约73.62万套，市场份额约2.3%，在国内供应商中排名第三。
这说明它早已不是“只有技术、没有量产”的公司。真正的考题是：量已经起来，利润为什么还没完全跟上？
2025年约1.90亿元净亏损也不能粗暴理解为“卖得越多亏得越多”。其中约1.31亿元为赎回负债相关财务成本，主要属于非现金费用。
更能反映经营改善的经调整净亏损，2023年至2025年分别约1.05亿元、6076万元和2929万元，三年下降七成以上；毛利率也从1.1%提高到10.7%、13.6%。
问题在于，最后这一步还没跨过去。2026年一季度，经调整净亏损由上年同期约807万元扩大至约1303万元，公司也预计2026年全年仍将亏损。
收入翻倍不容易，但从“接近盈利”走到“稳定盈利”，可能才是更难的一公里。
比1.90亿元更扎眼的，是94.4%2025年，拿森前五大客户贡献94.4%的收入，其中最大客户一家占47.2%。2026年一季度，前五大客户收入占比进一步达到96.9%。
翻译成大白话：公司每100元收入，大约94元来自五个客户。
汽车零部件行业客户集中并不罕见。进入主机厂供应链认证周期长，下游整车企业本身也较集中。
但“行业常见”不等于可以忽略。客户集中带来订单效率，也会让价格谈判、核心车型销量变化和采购调整更快传导到供应商业绩。
所以市场接下来要看的，不只是拿森收入还能涨多少，而是增长究竟来自更多客户、更广车型，还是主要由现有大客户继续放量。两种增长，数字都好看，质量却不完全一样。
营收在涨，现金却往外走2025年，拿森经营活动现金流净流出约1.65亿元，而2024年还是净流入约2534万元。同期，应收账款及票据增加约1.06亿元，存货增加约7100万元。
这意味着业务越快放量，企业越需要提前采购、生产和备货，然后等待主机厂按照账期结算。
一句话：卖得快，不等于收钱快。
此次上市，拿森获得约5.33亿港元净募集资金，其中约50%计划投入研发，约30%用于扩大和升级生产制造能力。
所以这5.33亿港元更像是一段继续证明自己的资金，而不是一张“盈利已经解决”的证明书。
接下来真正值得盯住的只有几件事：毛利率能否继续提升，客户集中度能否下降，经营现金流能否转正，经调整亏损能否最终清零。
2513倍认购，证明市场愿意押注；73.62万套销量，证明产品已经能卖。现在拿森需要证明最后一件事：卖得越多，不只是营收越高，而是利润和现金也能一起回来。
对拿森科技而言，上市不是交卷，而是盈利能力开始被放大审视的起点。
注：文中财务、客户集中度及募资用途等数据来自拿森科技招股书及公开发售资料；行业排名为招股书援引灼识咨询数据。本文仅基于公开信息作行业分析。
In 1958, China's total car production was under 20,000 units.
That year, workers at the Shanghai Automobile Assembly Plant hammered out the first Phoenix brand sedan. The body was shaped by hand hammering, and the curves of the fenders and roof were hammered out one strike at a time. No one knew that 71 years later, this factory in the alleyway would deliver its 100 millionth vehicle into users' hands.
100 million units. This figure, globally, is a threshold only a few giants like Toyota, Volkswagen, and GM have crossed.
From 20,000 to 100 million, the Chinese automotive industry took 71 years. SAIC is the one that has walked the furthest and most steadily on this path. But it has not stopped—just two months after 100 million units, it delivered a performance report of 2.384 million units from January to July, continuing to lead the Chinese car market.
From the historical weight of "100 million units" to the realistic speed of "2.384 million units"—SAIC, with a set of figures, wrote the opening of its second half. Crossing mountains and seas, a new chapter unfolds.
100 Million Units, A Coming of Age Ceremony for an Industry
In 1983, the first Santana rolled off the line in Shanghai. The local production rate was 2.7%, and only five items could be matched: tires, radios, horns, antennas, signs—countable on one hand. In the following decade, SAIC chewed through domestic parts enterprises piece by piece, and the local production rate finally broke 80%. That was the first time China possessed a truly modern automotive parts system.
Thereafter, in 1997, SAIC GM built a factory and produced cars in 23 months, and "Chinese Speed" was written into the global automotive industrial coordinate system; in 2006, the Roewe brand was born, and domestic brands had their own names for the first time; in 2016, the world's first internet-connected car, Roewe RX5, debuted, and cars had the ability to "think" for the first time.
Over the 70 years, every leap by SAIC was synchronized with the leap of the Chinese automotive industry—from "Can we build a car" to "Can we build a good car" to "Can we define a car". The walk wasn't fast, but every step counted. Sailed past 70 years of waves and sand, the bow has turned to the next sea area.
2.384 Million Units: Growth Amidst Adverse Trends
The Chinese car market in 2026, when the vast majority of automakers faced challenges of scaling down, SAIC's answer was 2.384 million units sold from January to July, steadily leading.
Behind the numbers lies a structural change. Domestic brands accounted for 72.4%, and for every three cars sold, more than two came from the domestic camp. The proposition of "market for technology" has a new answer—technology was not just traded for, but grew its own roots. SAIC Passenger Cars, IM, Maxus, Wuling, five domestic sectors took root and grew in their respective sub-segments, forming a complete defense line from low to high.
New energy is rewriting the power structure of this enterprise. Sales of 973,000 units from January to July, a growth rate of 27.4%, far exceeding industry average. Behind this figure is the sustained heat of MG4 family delivering over 17,000 units monthly, it is the market rhythm of Shangjie Z7/Z7T delivering over 20,000 units in just over two months, and it is the explosive power of MG07 pre-sale orders breaking 21,000 in 20 hours. Joint ventures were also making efforts—Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X joined the first tier of extended-range large SUVs, and Audi E7X delivered over 7,000 units in two months of launch.
From A0 class to mid-to-large SUVs, from daily commuting to luxury, SAIC's new energy map is covering every corner. New energy is no longer a trend, but daily life. In July, Wuling Starlight L, IM LS9 Hyper, MG07 landed successively, and the rhythm did not break.
Overseas: From Product to Home Court
Overseas cumulative sales of 876,000 units from January to July, year-on-year growth of 52.1%. Against the backdrop of the EU imposing additional tariffs, SAIC's choice was to plant roots deep—Frankfurt European Engineering Center focused on local R&D, Thailand, Indonesia, India three major bases support regional supply, 42 Ro-Ro ships guarantee global capacity.
In July, MG held the technical conference in London. Plug-in Hybrid+ Hybrid System, SolidCore Semi-Solid State Battery, MG Parking Smart Cockpit—three core technologies made a centralized appearance, systematically built three global technology tags: "Hybrid+ Hybrid", "SolidCore Solid/Semi-Solid Battery", "i-SMART Smart Driving". Same month, MG landed at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, MG Go! and Cyber Concept two concept cars had their global premiere.
From the technical conference to Goodwood, the signal released by MG was more important than new car launches: after sales expansion, the brand entered the next stage—from "Product Going Global" upgraded to "Technology Home Court". In Europe, MG brand cumulative sales of 218,000 units from January to July, consecutive champion for Chinese brands in Europe. As of July, overseas cumulative sales broke 7 million units. This road to going global has taken many years, every step is turning "Made in China" into "Known as China".
Domestic, New Energy, and Overseas three horse carriages working simultaneously—SAIC's growth engine switched from joint venture "single-core" to "multi-core" drive. Ranked 125th on the Fortune Global 500, up 13 positions from last year.
Joint Ventures are Being Redefined
Over 40 years of Chinese automotive joint ventures, the fixed script has never changed: foreign party provides technology, Chinese party provides market. SAIC is rewriting this script.
SAIC Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X, product definition led by the Chinese team, equipped with SAIC self-developed extended-range system and Yunqi Smart Cockpit—this is not "Importing German cars", it is "Defining German cars". Throughout 2026, SAIC Volkswagen plans to launch 7 new energy products, covering extended-range, plug-in hybrid, pure electric three technology routes.
Audi went further. April this year, Audi and SAIC signed a strategic cooperation agreement, plan to establish Audi Innovation Technology Center in Shanghai—Audi's first "full value chain" R&D entity outside Europe, start from vehicle platform to completely independent R&D. Audi abandoned the "Global Car" strategy, turned to "In the Local Market, For the Local Market".
SAIC GM is also transforming. March this year published three-year strategic plan, next three years launch more than a dozen new cars each year. January-July SAIC GM new energy vehicle sales 62,000 units, year-on-year growth of 75.2%.
Starting from Santana's localization rate of 2.7%, to now SAIC outputting core technology to joint venture brands—this path from learning to chasing to leading took a generation's time. The connotation of the word "Joint Venture" is being redefined. A new situation begins precisely when old boundaries are broken.
Technology: Not Suspended High Up
In the past decade, SAIC accumulated investment of nearly 190 billion yuan in electrification and intelligence, possessing over 24,000 valid patents. But the true meaning of these numbers lies in them moving from the lab to ordinary people's garages.
Roewe i6 at the 60k price level comes standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Smart Cockpit, MG4X at the 90k price level was the first to bring semi-solid state battery and rear-drive five-link independent suspension to this price range, SUVs under 300k come standard with steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering—a 5-meter long car turns more flexibly than an A0 class small car. In July, IM LS9 Hyper was the first to land the steer-by-wire national standard, MG07 brings 800V+5C fast charging to the 120k price level market.
Industry common play is to divide users by configuration—want good experience, must spend more money. SAIC is doing another thing: turn cutting-edge technology into standard equipment for users at different price levels.
Use scale to dilute R&D costs, use cost advantage to widen user coverage, use order scale to feed back next-generation technology. Once a positive cycle is established, technology is no longer numbers on a spec sheet, but daily life that every ordinary car owner can feel every day.
Conclusion:
From 1958's Phoenix brand to 2026's 100 million units; from the hammer in the alley to Frankfurt's Technology Center, London's Technical Conference, Goodwood's Festival of Speed. This road took 71 years, not fast, but every step changed the boundaries of the Chinese automotive industry.
100 million units is not the end. Standing on this step, the question SAIC needs to answer is no longer "Can we build a car", but "How to define mobility in the next era". Mountains and seas have been crossed, a new situation has opened, the next journey is right beneath your feet.
Every step on this road concerns the daily mobility of countless people. 100 million units is not for looking back, it is for starting out.
編輯導語：轉型學費已經交咗，長安將呢局叫「高原配速調整」；市場願唔願意等佢後程加速，要睇 Q06 落場嗰腳電門，係咪真係比 PPT 更跟腳。
7 月下旬，長安汽車接連釋放兩份關鍵信號：一邊係 7 月中旬披露嘅半年度業績預報——上半年整車銷售 111.89 萬輛（同比下滑 17.44%），歸母公司股東淨利潤僅 7.4 億至 9.7 億元（同比下降 57.66%—67.70%），扣非淨利潤 2.3 億至 3.3 億元（同比下降 77.65%—84.42%）；
另外一邊係 7 月 23 日公告 52.67 億元定向增發獲深交所審核通過，資金將投向新能源車型及數智平台（42.17 億元）與全球研發中心（10.50 億元）。
一冷一熱之間，呢間年銷逼近 300 萬輛級嘅央企車企，正主動將「規模光環」拆落嚟。喺年中有媒體溝通會上，中國長安汽車集團黨委副書記、董事譚本宏將呢種反差講得好直白：「上半年集團主動砍掉毛利低效產品，唔再片面追求無利潤嘅規模增量。」佢用咗一個馬拉松比喻——「高原跑馬拉松，前 5 公里同後 5 公里配速肯定唔一樣，盲目加速只會透支實力。」
「拋棄」7 萬輛：唔係賣唔到，係唔想賣
長安呢輪下滑，至少有壹塊係自己親手切走嘅。
今年 4 月「1445」全球戰略落地，產品譜系從 63 款壓縮到 36 款。最扎眼嘅動作係停產 Lumin——一款定價 5 萬元以下嘅微型電車，去年仲係走量主力，單上半年就空出約 7 萬輛缺口。「低端微型電動車盈利空間極度狹窄，企業唔再片面追求無利潤嘅規模增量。」譚本宏喺溝通會上冇兜彎子，「Lumin 叫停後，新能源板塊均價同利潤率反而抬上嚟；剔除 Lumin 減量，長安新能源上半年同比實際增長 11.2%。」
中車網查詢咗一位接近長安內部嘅知情人，佢算咗一筆帳：「Lumin 巔峰期月銷過萬，但單車毛利長期喺幾百塊到一千幾蚊徘徊，計埋渠道返利同資金佔用，有陣時賣一輛虧一輛。與其拿佢沖排行榜，不如將產線讓俾啟源 Q05、深藍 S05 呢啲能夠跑通毛利嘅新能源。」喺佢睇嚟，砍 Lumin 唔係認輸，係「將無效規模換咗有效研發頻寬」。
但主動瘦身解釋唔晒全部。燃油基盤退潮更快：CS75 燃油版上半年同比跌過 37%，逸動靠終端減價守份額，CS55、UNI-T/K 等舊 SUV 環比走弱。 新能源端 41.42 萬輛、同比下滑 8.3%，啟源 Q05（約 7.2 萬）同深藍 S05（約 7.9 萬）扛住大盤，阿維塔上半年僅 2.76 萬輛、同比近乎腰斬，四年累計虧損超 130 億。 譚本宏亦承認：「我哋而家仲未完全掌握咗多品牌嘅經營能力。」
外部擠壓同樣真實。公司將利潤縮水首要歸因於匯兌損失 + 原材料加價：上半年海外銷 45.47 萬輛、同比漲 51.87%，海外佔總量約 33.6%，匯率稍有波動利潤就出血；碳酸鋰回漲至 18 萬元/噸、儲存晶片單價幾倍跳，行業平均利潤率被壓到 3.4% 上下。 券商汽車分析師李強認為：「長安嘅『跌』係主動 + 扭埋一齊，但主動部分佔比比市場諗嘅更高——佢選擇喺 300 萬輛高位自己踩煞車，而不是等坡底再煞。」
賭自研智駕，拒絕做「組裝廠」
錢點行，比錢本身更說明問題。
呢次定增由控股股東現金全額包攬，股價低於發行價仲鎖三年，市場普遍解讀為「央企大股東兜底信心」。集資唔擴產能，只投研發：42.17 億進新能源車型及數智平台，10.5 億進全球研發中心。 對應長安過去五年智能化累計投入超百億、團隊破 7500 人、2026 年單算力中心砸約 30 億嘅節奏。
智駕係呢筆錢嘅核心落點。譚本宏喺溝通會上拋過一個尖銳判斷：「如果車企放棄智駕自研，只依賴外部供應，本質上只係保留咗造車殼子嘅組裝工廠，冇核心科技壁壘。」佢自稱「重度智駕使用者」，開阿維塔 90% 場景開智駕，但強調長安唔揀激進路線，「將核心精力放喺拉高安全上限、打磨體驗上」。
落地載體係「天樞領航」系統——一段式端到端 + 多模態大模型，計劃 9 月隨啟源 Q06 量產上車。執行副總裁楊大勇將 Q06 定義為「啟源下半年為智駕而戰」嘅旗艦：「天樞領航 Ultra 唔係湊功能，係將長安數智承諾兌現俾主流家庭用戶。」而譚本宏口中之「一腦多體」，係將智駕大模型當「腦」，向機器人、低空出行等「體」外溢，長安天樞智能機器人子公司喺牌桌上。
逼住將呢套邏輯向一位新勢力智駕負責人詢問，佢回覆克制：「7500 人如果係智駕 + 座艙 + 三電打包，單賽道濃度唔及華為車 BU（7000—8000 人專職智駕）、小鵬（約 3000 人智駕團隊 + 百億研發）。長安嘅優勢係整車銷量基盤同央企融資通道，劣勢係 C 端用戶對『天樞』仲未建立像『XNGP』『ADS』嗰種心智。Q06 夠唔夠打，睇嘅係全國可用率同接管率，唔係發布會 PPT。」
組織端喺收口：深藍與阿維塔中後端協同，目標 150 萬輛級中高端集群、降本 20%—30%；四位副總主抓海外，泰國基地已規模化投產，譚本宏放話「未來國內海外五五開」。 呢啲動作短期省唔出利潤，但將過去「多生仔好打仔」嘅分散鋪貨往「區間互補」收。
長安 2026 年上半年嘅量利雙降，唔係潰敗敘事，而係一家 300 萬輛級央企喺「燃油退坡快過新能源接棒、低端規模讓位比毛利質量、智駕重投入未到兌現期」三段裂縫同時張開時嘅主動慢駛。
譚本宏砍掉 Lumin 嘅 7 萬輛，換到嘅係唔拿無效規模粉飾報表嘅底色；52.67 億定增過會，換到嘅係天樞智駕同數智平台再跑 18 個月嘅彈藥。
後半年真正要盯住嘅三個變數好具體——啟源 Q06 天樞領航量產後嘅真實接管表現、深藍/啟源/阿維塔三品牌內耗係咪真係降咗落嚟、海外 45 萬銷量基盤能否將匯兌反噬對沖掉。
轉型學費已經交咗，長安將呢局叫做「高原配速調整」；市場願唔願意等佢後程加速，要睇 Q06 落場嗰腳電門，係咪真係比 PPT 更跟腳。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 9's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 77,000 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 9. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the saving of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 9's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 9's Basic differ somewhat in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both closely.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
Chery Tiggo 9 uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will feel different in handling; a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 9 warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the model with richer specifications. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 9 are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal; spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If you have a limited budget, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the few thousand price difference might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating for Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating for Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is TBD, and the active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety equipment, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic system. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length is 4400 mm, trunk capacity 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, and the difference in interior space is negligible. Cars in this class are perfectly adequate for daily use.
Both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both models; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealers, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a significant decision; spending some time on preparation is never a mistake.
7 月 23 日，首批交付泰國嘅福田卡文樂福海外版 CAVAN C1 右舵車款於上海港整裝完畢，正式啟航。此次批量交付，標誌著福田卡文汽車繼成功交付歐洲海外市場客戶後，喺東南亞核心市場嘅全球化戰略落地取得實質性突破，進一步完善咗品牌全球市場佈局。
佈局東南亞市場 築牢區域綠色轉型支點
隨著全球交通範疇低碳化發展進程持續加快，東南亞市場憑藉強勁嘅市場活力同發展潛力，已然成為中國新能源商用車出口嘅重要增量賽道。福田卡文汽車緊抓行業發展大勢，堅定推進全球化發展戰略，將東南亞列為海外戰略佈局重要板塊，打造右舵新能源車款落地嘅產業樞紐。
本次卡文樂福海外版——CAVAN C1 右舵車款批量出口，並非單次階段性產品輸出，而是福田卡文汽車以泰國為戰略支點，輻射馬來西亞、印尼等右舵區域市場，搭建完整立體嘅東南亞市場體系嘅關鍵一步。此舉既落地咗品牌長期海外佈局規劃，又進一步助推中國新能源商用車品牌走向全球。
目前，福田卡文汽車產品已成功銷往全球 25 個國家同地區，形成以歐洲市場為核心，東南亞、澳新等多區域協同發展嘅全球化市場格局。同時，品牌屢獲歐盟 WVTA、英國 GB、澳大利亞 VTA 等多項國際權威准入資質，以嚴苛嘅高端市場認證標準，為全球用戶提供智能、高效、可靠嘅新能源物流解決方案。
深耕品質研發 樹立全球商用車價值標杆
戰略落地，品質為基。針對泰國高溫高濕嘅熱帶氣候、複雜路況、右舵通行法規要求及城市末端配送嘅多元化應用場景，福田卡文汽車摒棄簡單車款改型嘅粗放式開發模式，嚴格踐行「一區一策、一國一策」嘅本地化研發策略，聚焦當地用戶實際營運痛點開展專項深度研發，以經得起市場長期檢驗嘅硬核出海品質，持續夯實海外市場口碑、贏得全球客戶信賴。
自品牌創立以來，福田卡文汽車始終立足全球化發展視野，圍繞「全新平台架構、極致能效管理、高階智能化、軟件定義汽車」，喺能源架構、智能架構、信任架構等核心領域實現系統性突破，以三大架構、六大技術重塑商用車基因，構建起覆蓋微、輕、重型嘅新能源專屬整車平台，以卓越品質樹立全球新能源商用車價值標杆。
升級出海模式 構建可持續生態化出海體系
產品出海係基礎，生態出海係核心。作為北汽福田旗下新能源商用車專屬品牌，福田卡文汽車始終秉持「讓每一公里更美好」嘅品牌使命，以「致力於成為新能源技術領先嘅國際企業」嘅發展願景，持續輸出高品質智能產品與全週期配套服務，助力全球物流運輸行業綠色低碳轉型。
本次 CAVAN C1 右舵車款批量啟航泰國，係福田卡文汽車「全面國際化」戰略從佈局規劃走向落地收穫嘅重要印證。倚靠泰國完善嘅產業配套同本地化售後服務體系，品牌已實現從單一產品輸出，向「產品 + 服務 + 品牌 + 生態」嘅體系化出海模式升級，徹底完成從「產品出海」到「生態出海」嘅跨越式發展。
泰國市場嘅成功落地，充分驗證咗福田卡文汽車「正向研發 + 體系化出海」雙核驅動嘅核心全球競爭力。依照整體發展規劃，品牌將持續鋪開全球營銷服務網絡，穩步兌現各階段海外銷量目標，並將計劃喺 2026 年 9 月登陸德國漢諾威車展，全方位展現中國智造嘅硬核實力。
面向長遠發展，福田卡文將持續深耕全球海外市場，倚靠各國法規標準同用戶營運需求持續迭代優化新能源產品矩陣，不断完善全球化營銷服務生態網絡。始終踐行品牌初心與承諾，持續引領全球商用車綠色轉型，輸出科技、高效嘅全球物流解決方案。
