首頁Mazda CX-30
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) etc.
The OTR price of Mitsubishi Xforce in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930) etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are fully adequate for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 嚟做比較。这两款车喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面嚟做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
GWM Haval H6 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 139,750 - 139,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Turbo Standard（RM 140,000）、1.5L Turbo Premium（RM 155,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 GWM Haval H6 平咗 RM 49,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要註意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
GWM Haval H6 搭載 Hybrid，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
動力方面，GWM Haval H6 嘅 Hybrid 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
GWM Haval H6 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 GWM Haval H6 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
GWM Haval H6 保用 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X50 同 GWM Haval H6 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than the Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
The Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Toyota Yaris Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include TSS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New car safety is generally not poor nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就係多個方面做詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起價的確比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 56,739。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。依家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Perodua Aruz 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Kia Sportage 保修 5 年/300,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Ativa's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 62,500 - 73,400, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.0L Turbo X (RM 62,500), 1.0L Turbo H (RM 67,300), 1.0L Turbo AV (RM 73,400), etc.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Ativa is indeed RM 44,300 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Ativa's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA.
Proton X90's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Both cars have the same safety rating; safety features in this segment are quite comprehensive. New car safety is generally good nowadays, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Ativa body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars have almost the same dimensions, and the interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this segment are more than sufficient for daily use.
Perodua Ativa warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs also depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups about their experience.
Both Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Perodua Ativa and Proton X90 are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 馬自達 CX-8 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 9 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做詳細比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360）等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 166,800 - 179,800，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 2.0T Standard（RM 179,750）等。
由價錢睇，馬自達 CX-8 嘅起步價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 9 平咗 RM 1,440。如果你預算有限，馬自達嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嘅幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
馬自達 CX-8 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
兩款車用住同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本冇分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
馬自達 CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 9 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-8 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，馬自達 CX-8 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 9 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵主要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎賓士 GLE 同路虎 發現運動 做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我就從多個方面做詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
賓士 GLE 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 544,888 - 544,888，合共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 544,888）等。
路虎 發現運動喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 499,800 - 499,800，合共 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 499,800）等。
從價錢睇，路虎 發現運動嘅起跳價比賓士 GLE 平咗 RM 45,088。老實講，喺呢個價位段，差幾千蚊其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅 CP 值同長期使用成本。
賓士 GLE 搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
路虎 發現運動搭載 3.0L Turbo，馬力 350 hp。官方油耗 12.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常行落嚟嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都唔差，唔使太糾結呢一點。
賓士 GLE 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
路虎 發現運動採用 4WD 驅動方式。
賓士嘅 FWD 同路虎嘅 4WD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
賓士 GLE 保用 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
路虎 發現運動保用 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
賓士 GLE 同路虎 發現運動都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑好啲嗰款；如果你更在意 CP 值同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總嘅嚟講，賓士 GLE 同路虎 發現運動都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿寶馬 X1 同路虎 發現運動版做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶馬 X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，合共有 2 個型號，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000）等。
路虎 發現運動版 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 499,800 - 499,800，合共有 1 個型號，包括 Standard（RM 499,800）等。
從價錢嚟睇，寶馬 X1 嘅起步價的確比路虎 發現運動版 平咗 RM 247,000。如果你預算有限，寶馬嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰啲幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要睇你需要。
寶馬 X1 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
路虎 發現運動版 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩部車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶馬 X1 嘅 Premium ADAS 同路虎 發現運動版 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
寶馬 X1 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
路虎 發現運動版 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
寶馬 X1 嘅 FWD 同路虎 發現運動版 嘅 4WD 喺操控感覺上會有唔同嘅感受，建議試車對比。
寶馬 X1 保養保證 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
路虎 發現運動版 保養保證 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，寶馬 X1 同路虎 發現運動版 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都係睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
比亞迪正式發布 2026 年 5 月產銷快報，全品牌新能源汽車單月銷量 383453 輛，同比微增 0.26%，時隔十個月實現單月銷量同比轉正；其中乘用車交付 376990 輛，環比大漲 19.4%，一掃前期車型換代陣痛，呈現國內基本盤穩固、海外銷量狂飆、高端品牌全線放量的全新格局，在國內新能源內捲加劇、特斯拉 FSD 入華、自主新品密集上市的市場環境中，走出獨有的結構性增長路線。
王朝 + 海洋兩大主力品牌 5 月合計售出 330215 輛，佔據集團總銷量超八成，仍是比亞迪銷量壓艙石，全系列共 8 款車型單月銷量突破 2 萬台，產品從 5 萬入門代步到 20 萬家用 SUV 實現全覆蓋。
王朝網內部，元家族 56691 輛、宋家族 51370 輛。雙雙跨過五萬門檻，成為品牌兩大銷量支柱，兼顧家用代步與城鄉出行需求；秦家族緊隨其後交出 28360 台穩定表現，漢、唐系列月銷維持六千級體量，深耕中大型家用轎車、SUV 細分市場；全新車型夏處於市場培育期，單月交付 1810 台，後續隨渠道鋪開有望穩步上量。
海洋網增長勢頭更為迅猛，全系五款車型跨入兩萬俱樂部：海獅 42615 台、海豹 34117 台、海鷗 39919 台、海豚 22260 台、宋 PLUS 27755 台。其中海鷗憑藉 6-8 萬親民定價穩居入門代步銷冠，海獅作為全新走量車型上市即站穩四萬量級，補齊海洋網中型 SUV 產品空白，完善海洋產品梯隊佈局。從代步小車到緊湊 SUV，兩大主品牌依托 DM-i 混動與純電雙線技術，牢牢鎖住 15 萬以內國內主流家用市場份額。
方程豹同比暴漲 139.7% 品牌向上落地見效騰勢、方程豹、仰望組成的高端矩陣 5 月合計銷售 46489 輛，正式擺脫小眾定位，成為比亞迪品牌溢價與利潤增長新支點，打破自主品牌高端化難破局的行業魔咒。
越野品牌方程豹單月 30186 輛，同比暴漲 139.7%，創下品牌上市以來月度銷量新高，旗下鎦 7 單月 18280 台，豹 5、豹 8 穩定輸出，在 25-40 萬硬派越野細分市場持續擠壓合資、進口車型生存空間。
騰勢 5 月交付 16303 台，MPV 標桿 D9 售出 6721 台，Z9 系列近 6000 台，MPV、中大型轎車雙線發力，站穩豪華新能源賽道；百萬元級超豪華品牌仰望穩步爬坡，當月交付 286 台，同比增幅 105.8%，完成自主品牌天花板產品的市場驗證，形成從十幾萬家用、三四十萬越野、五十萬豪華 MPV 到百萬元級旗艦的全價格帶產品佈局。
5 月比亞迪乘用車和皮卡海外銷量 160177 輛，同比大漲 80.7%，出口佔全系總銷量突破 42%，創下品牌出海歷史新高，成為穩住 5 月整體銷量、實現同比轉正的核心驅動力。
東南亞、歐洲、拉美成為主力增量市場，海鷗、宋 PLUS、元系列持續登頂多國新能源熱銷榜單，SHARK 皮卡連續兩月單月出口突破 4000 台；依托泰國、巴西、匈牙利、烏茲別克斯坦四大海外整車工廠落地投產，本地化生產持續落地，規避關稅同時快速下沉終端渠道。在國內車市存量競爭、價格戰常態化背景下，高速擴容的海外市場有效對沖國內車型換代帶來的銷量波動，正式從補充市場升級為比亞迪核心增長引擎。截至當前，比亞迪新能源汽車全球累計銷量已經突破 1650 萬輛，全球化版圖持續拓寬。
智駕賦能產品迭代 下半年新品蓄力衝量5 月比亞迪智能化落地迎來關鍵節點，天神之眼智駕系統成為車型核心加分項：全品牌搭載高級智駕車型保有量突破 315 萬輛，日均路測數據超 2 億公里；當月比亞迪落地城市領航、智能泊車雙安全兜底服務，成為全球首家實現兩項智駕兜底的車企，政策落地三天後，搭載天神之眼系統車型的城市 NOA 激活率暴漲 50%，智能化體驗升級直接拉動終端到店訂單轉化，為後續車型持續走量築牢產品競爭力，直面 FSD 入華帶來的智駕市場衝擊。
從數據細節來看，2026 年 1-5 月比亞迪累計銷量 1405039 輛，同比下滑 20.32%，核心誘因是全系主力車型集中換代、第二代閃充刀片電池產能爬坡受限。新款閃充電池升級快充與低溫性能，全系換代車型優先換裝新電池，但產線改造拖累產能釋放，熱門車型訂單積壓、交付延後，一定程度壓縮 5 月交付體量。
隨著二季度末二代刀片電池產能持續釋放，疊加騰勢 N8L、方程豹鎦 7 純電版、海獅 05、夏 L 等多款新車陸續登陸市場，業內普遍預判比亞迪 6 月全品牌銷量有望突破 40 萬輛。依托低端走量鎖份額、高端提利潤、海外衝增量、智能化提產品力的四維發展邏輯，在國內新能源淘汰賽加劇的當下，比亞迪全品類佈局優勢持續放大，坐穩國內新能源龍頭，加速向著全球頭部車企穩步邁進。
車型概覽
吉利豪越L 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講每日相處是否輕鬆，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
吉利豪越L 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 2.0T 雙離合版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 吉利豪越L 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1969 mL 排量 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 218 Ps / 160 kW、325 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4900 mm、車闊 1910 mm、車高 1770 mm、軸距 2825 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
吉利豪越L 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 吉利豪越L 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「吉利 Geely 豪越 L 適合長途自駕嗎？」簡單講，絕對適合，吉利 Geely 豪越 L 空間大且座椅舒適，適合家庭出遊。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 吉利豪越L 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 吉利豪越L 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講香港停車場同窄路使用，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 560km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2025 668km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2025 708km 前驅版（價格待確認）、2025 630km 四驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
65/74.4/79.2 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 560/668/708/630 km 嘅續航參考，對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 13.6/12.9/12.8 kWh/100km 嘅耗電表現，會影響你去快充站或者屋苑充電位嘅頻率。 185/200/390 kW、360/690 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。
優缺點分析
Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：日常能源成本有基本參考、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「極狐阿爾法 S5 於香港落地價大約係幾多？」簡單講，極狐阿爾法 S5 於香港落地價約280,000–460,000 港元，視版本而定。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Arcfox極狐 阿爾法S5 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
廣汽埃安 Y Plus 值唔值買，關鍵唔係佢睇落幾吸引，而係佢可唔可以解決你嘅真實用車需求。呢篇文章會把重點放喺版本之間嘅取舍。
價格落喺 RM 119,750 - 135,750，買家可以先用佢判斷預算壓力同同級定位。
購車價格指南
廣汽埃安 Y Plus 嘅購車預算可以先從 RM 119,750 - 135,750 開始衡量。呢個數字真正影響嘅係月供、保險同現金流，而不只係車行入面嘅標價。
如果你喺幾個版本之間糾結，可以把 2025 490 公里精選版（RM 135,750）、2025 490 公里精英版（RM 119,750） 放喺同一張清單入面比較。日常通勤買家優先睇舒適同安全，常行高速嘅買家則更加應重視動力、輔助駕駛同車廂方便。
核心參數匯總
睇廣汽埃安 Y Plus 嘅核心規格，最重要係把數字轉譯成生活入面嘅感覺。
63.2 千瓦時嘅電池容量，重點係可唔可以支撐一星期通勤同週末外出。150 千瓦、225 牛·米嘅輸出，令高速變線同短距離超車更有信心。車長 4535 毫米、車闊 1870 毫米、車高 1650 毫米、軸距 2750 毫米，可以幫到你預判泊車難度同後排乘坐空間。定比波箱、前輪驅動佈局 嘅設定，會影響起步順滑度、濕路穩定感同長途巡航感。
優缺點分析
廣汽埃安 Y Plus 嘅優點唔使誇張，真正有價值嘅係佢可唔可以令日常使用更慳心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出能支撐高速同超車需求、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
需要留意嘅係，需要先確認屋企、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、市區泊車同狹窄路段仍要睇個人駕駛習慣。呢啲唔係扣分項，而係落訂前應該諗清楚嘅生活細節。
購車常見問題解答
購買廣汽埃安 Y Plus 前，買家最常問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你嘅生活。
呢輛車適合邊個？適合把版本之間嘅取舍放喺首位嘅買家。 家庭用戶要睇啲乜？優先睇後排乘坐、兒童座椅、行李同日常上下車係唔係順手。每日開會唔會麻煩？只要充電條件穩定，電動車嘅通勤體驗通常更安靜，也容易控制日常能源成本。
競品比較內容
把廣汽埃安 Y Plus 放進同級車名單時，唔建議只睇品牌或外形。真正有用嘅比較順序係：先用 RM 119,750 - 135,750 鎖定預算範圍、再看動力係唔係足夠應付高速同滿載、然後比較能源成本同補電方便、最後睇空間係唔適合家人同行李。
咁樣篩選出來嘅結果更貼近日常生活。你會更清楚佢係適合城市通勤、家庭代步、長途巡航，定係更適合作為一輛講求個性嘅選擇。
用車全週期指南
擁有廣汽埃安 Y Plus 嘅關鍵，係先把充電安排諗清楚。家充、公司充電或商場快充只要其中一項穩定，日常體驗就會輕鬆好多。
如果你常行南北大道，動力同車廂舒適度會比單純低價更重要；如果主要喺市區，泊車靈活性、視野同低速順滑度會更加影響心情。
車型概覽
iCAUR V23 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講充電節奏同日常通勤，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「iCAUR V27右軚版終於到香港，同場仲有部奇奇怪怪嘅V23？【2026香港車博會】」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
HK$ 169,900 / HK$ 219,900 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
iCAUR V23 嘅購車預算可以先由 HK$ 169,900 / HK$ 219,900 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 後驅版（HK$ 169,900）、2025 四驅版（HK$ 219,900）、2026 復古版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 iCAUR V23 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
iCAUR V23 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
iCAUR V23 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 iCAUR V23 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「iCAUR V23 充電要幾耐？」簡單講，iCAUR V23 支援最高 100 kW DC 快充，部分型號半個鐘就可以由 30% 充到 80%。用快充嘅話，後驅版 10-80% 約需 56 分鐘，四驅版約需 77 分鐘。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 iCAUR V23 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 HK$ 169,900 / HK$ 219,900 鎖定預算圈。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 iCAUR V23 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講香港停車場同窄路使用，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2024 1.5T 102km 四驅版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
18.74 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 167 Ps / 123 kW / 220 kW、243/510 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4705 mm、車闊 1908 mm、車高 1780 mm、軸距 2810 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 混合動力專用(DHT)、前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「哈弗 Haval 二代大狗 PHEV 變速箱係邊款？」簡單講，哈弗 Haval 二代大狗 PHEV 配備咗 2 速 DHT 混能專用變速箱。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 哈弗二代大狗 PHEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
Acura ADX 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Acura ADX 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 1.5T 兩驅標準版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 兩驅A-Spec組合版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 兩驅A-Spec先進版（價格待確認）、2026 1.5T 四驅標準版（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Acura ADX 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 190 Ps、179 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4719 mm、車闊 1842 mm、車高 1621 mm、軸距 2654 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 無級變速(CVT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
Acura ADX 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Acura ADX 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Acura ADX 用咩引擎？」簡單講，Acura ADX 通常搭載 1.5 公升四缸渦輪增壓引擎，平衡咗馬力同燃油效率。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Acura ADX 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Acura ADX 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
Recently, according to multiple media reports including People's Daily Online and Guangming Net, Chongqing investigated the first AI fake advertising case – the queueing to buy car footage was all fake! In the video, the store was packed with people, grabbing cars like grabbing cabbages, with captions "Blind orders are really too hot".
The result was that law enforcement officers found not a single real person and no real transactions; it was purely an AI performance of a hot sales drama.
My God, this is not selling cars? Even hiring actors would be considered troublesome! Intentionally faking facts and concealing the truth to create anxiety of "if you don't buy now it's gone", forcing you to follow the trend and place orders, isn't this naked consumer fraud? Thinking it was done flawlessly, once the regulation checked it, the true face was exposed.
•The trust crack caused by AI-car making is tearing up the entire industry
AI faking is not new in the auto circle, but this recent operation is absolutely outrageous. Have you seen screenshots of "Lei Jun live streaming sales of AITO M9" or "Yu Chengdong standing up for Xiaomi SU7"? The interface layout, character expressions, and bullet screen interactions were highly realistic; if not for official rumor refutation, the public opinion impact would have been huge.
These fake content spreads extremely fast, often covering millions of users within a few hours, bringing immense public opinion pressure to brands.
Even more absurdly, some accounts even let Lei Jun "sell" cars from other brands, and Yu Chengdong "promoted" Xiaomi, making "cross-brand standing" in the AI era completely handled by algorithms.
If the big bosses bringing each other counts as "entertaining memes", then the malicious tampering targeting specific car models is the real tumor shaking the industry foundation. During the release of Voyah Tai Shan X8, an image of "Chairman Lu Fang posing with the new car, trunk turned into 'Man's Wardrobe'" swept the entire internet.
The scene was complete and people looked natural, causing many users to believe it, even asking about the press conference location. The truth was: the original photo was a group photo of other public figures, and after AI fast face swap, scene replacement, and copy modification, it became a "news photo" misleading the market in minutes.
Finally, the Chairman of Voyah had to step out personally to clarify, stopping the spread of rumors.
Similar events have erupted intensively in the past two years; almost all mainstream brands have not escaped. Xiaomi Auto has released official statements 2 to 3 times in the past two years, refuting AI-generated content including fake executive appointments, forged model function copy, etc.;
During the Guangzhou Auto Show, Xpeng Cars encountered AI-generated vulgar exhibition hall videos spread maliciously, with the Legal Department urgently refuting the rumor;
Xpeng GX interior "spy photos" were massively forwarded, seeming like real sneak shots, but the rearview mirror proportion was distorted and interior lines misaligned, typical AI loopholes were spotted at a glance;
Avatr also released a legal statement pointing out that the false publicity images severely infringed on the brand reputation.
From the current industry phenomenon, car circle AI images can be roughly divided into three categories, with hazards increasing step by step:
The first category is the entertaining "wish list images", such as free new car replacement, high points gifts, etc., leaning towards memes, relatively harmless spreading;
The second category is the "half-real images" with realistic details, tampering with configuration, parameters, interior, and prices based on real car models, professional, extremely difficult for ordinary consumers to distinguish;
The third category is the malicious defamation "black PR images", attacking brands through vulgar, distorted, and fabricated content, causing huge damage to reputation.
What truly shakes the industry foundation is those fake-looking real high-fake contents in the middle zone, like Shangjie Z7 winter test official photos. Clearly real car shots, just because of abnormal wheel hub visuals, were directly judged by netizens as "AI generated", and the official had to clarify specifically that it was just a confidentiality design.
Official promotional photos of brands like AITO, Li Auto, Xpeng, etc., are also frequently enlarged by netizens to compare light and shadow, lines, and pick out details. As long as there is a slight visual deviation, they will be labeled "fake photos".
More terrifying than AI faking is the whole industry falling into a weird loop of "proving innocence". In the past, when car companies released official photos, winter test videos, spy photos, users tacitly believed them to be real. Now, official content instead has to accept the whole internet "authentication".
Car companies are forced into a vicious cycle, releasing content – being questioned – urgently refuting – being questioned again. When reality needs repeated self-proof, industry trust has quietly collapsed.
Industry data shows that the judicial appraisal cost of a single AI image has exceeded 50,000 yuan; more than 90% of fake content is spread after more than 10 reposts, the source tracing difficulty is huge; the legal boundary between entertainment memes and commercial defamation is blurred, evidence collection cycle is long, rights protection efficiency is low.
For car companies, whether letting it go or enforcing accountability, they have to pay high costs. This is already not the dilemma of a single brand, but a systemic problem facing the whole industry together.
And this Chongqing case of "enterprise actively using AI to fake queueing" pushes this crisis to a new height; it is the first case of enterprise active faking to mislead consumers as announced by officials.
Today can use AI to fake hot sales, tomorrow can use AI to fake sales volume, reputation, review. Don't always think about going the wrong way to play tricks, relying on false publicity to gain traffic and scam customers, in the end it will only bring stones to break one's own feet.
The essence of this crisis is the collision between digital technology and traditional industrial civilization.
The auto industry is inherently focused on precision, rigor, and safety; users buy real chassis, power, handling, safety performance, not a beautiful picture.
When AI makes text, images, and videos unreliable, real experience and authoritative data are becoming the new trust cornerstone. 16 million new energy vehicles sold in the whole of 2025, penetration rate broke through 50% for the first time; in some months in 2026 even pushed above 55%. The more white-hot market competition, the more likely those companies relying on AI "adding extra scenes" will be backfired.
Fortunately, regulations have already acted. On April 26, 2026, the State Administration for Market Regulation launched a six-month Internet advertising rectification action, explicitly listing "AI generative advertising" as one of the six key points.
Then on May 26, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology released "2026 Automotive Standardization Work Points", systematically laying out automotive AI standards. According to experts: "AI will become a booster for mobile intelligent agents, but misuse is a rollover accelerator."
•Real products and user reputation are the best advertising
The opposite of "fake queueing" is exactly those players speaking with hard power. When the "hot" forged by AI becomes a joke, the real hotness is happening in the factories and delivery centers of BYD, Deepal, Xpeng, and SAIC.
At the 2026 Beijing Auto Show, BYD booked the entire E3 Hall, directly setting up a "-30°C low temperature flash charging" actual test area and full scenario parking experience area;
Deepal L06 Max limited time starting from 118,900 yuan, all series standard with CATL Golden Bell Battery, even bringing magnetic rheological chassis which only million-level luxury cars have.
When others are still "adding scenes" in the editing room, these brands are already betting with real technology.
Look at intelligent driving again. Among Xpeng Ultra users, the proportion of "opening intelligent driving every day" in the first week of new cars soared to 98.52%, March Ultra model orders increased by 118% month-on-month. He Xiaopeng's original words: "Intelligent driving has changed from showing off skills to a rigid decision point."
SAIC even launched the concept car of "Global First AI Native Car" Jia Yue 07, making the whole vehicle hardware customized for the AI underlying layer.
Even Shangjie, which has been troubled by AI rumors, insisted on releasing original test data after the Z7 winter test controversy, using real parameters to fight back questions.
Industry change has quietly occurred, more and more brands choose to release original data of actual tests, Li Auto and other brands actively strengthen information transparency; China Automotive Technology and Research Center and other authoritative institutions' crash tests, professional review traffic increased by about 30% year-on-year; offline test drives, real human actual tests, live car teardown, etc. verifiable content is more convincing than refined text and images.
Consumers are not stupid either; whose product can withstand real road tests, whose data dares to face third-party teardown, that is who will win the next round of voting.
Big boss speeches are also getting more realistic. In May this year, at the Shenzhen Future Automotive Pioneer Conference, Avatr Chairman Wang Hui spoke directly: "Sales without profit is fake sales."
Wang Lang added a knife: "Rather than exhausting in internal involution, grow in value."
Li Auto's Li Bin gave data: January to April cumulative delivery over 112,000 vehicles, year-on-year growth 71%, operating profit profit for two consecutive quarters.
BYD's Wang Chuanfu's sentence "Building high-end brands is never a one-step process", perhaps is the clearest footnote to the industry.
Pull the lens back to see – 2025 Chinese car exports 6.8 million vehicles, accounting for 18.6% of total sales. In Europe, Chinese share 7.4% surpassed Korea for the first time; in Thailand, Chinese brand share 34.3% firmly No. 1; in Brazil, new energy field already holds half.
Chery exports nearly 1.2 million vehicles to become the "export number one"; SAIC MG delivered 250,000 in Europe, year-on-year growth over 20%. I ask: If Chinese cars cannot present solid technology and products, can they conquer so many markets globally at the same time?
In the era where AI can "create" everything, truth is the longest lasting competitiveness. Just like Dali Lun for Great Wall Motor that heartfelt "Great Wall Cannon" – that is a real emotional expression, no script, no AI rendering, just happened to become the most scarce content for brands now.
When your product can be liked by real users, can be spread out in reality, then your brand itself is the cheapest and most effective advertising. This is the two-way rush towards real human touch.
•Electric EV:
The person in charge of Chongqing Liangjiang New Area Market Regulation Bureau said clearly: "AI is a normal technical tool, but it absolutely cannot become the 'shield' for false publicity."
A series of absurd events are all throwing out the same question: In an era where algorithms can easily copy all visual appearances, what is the most irreplaceable core of the auto industry?
Chinese cars are charging to the world at unprecedented speed, rather than using AI to fabricate "hotness", better to light up the market with products, what do you think?
編輯導語：收編雷達汽車，被視為推進「一個吉利」戰略、持續優化資源配置嘅又一重要舉措。
近日，吉利汽車喺港交所公告，擬斥資約 2.18 億現金收購雷達汽車三家核心主體全部股權。交易完成後，雷達汽車將作為全資子公司併入上市公司報表，標誌住該新能源皮卡品牌正式從集團孵化項目轉為上市主體嘅核心業務板塊。
呢次係吉利控股落實《台州宣言》嘅關鍵一步。兩年前發布嘅該宣言確立咗戰略聚焦、整合、協同等五大方向，旨在扭轉過往多品牌獨立運營導致嘅資源重複與效率低下問題，推動集團向集中協同轉型。
喺呢條戰略指引下，吉利已相繼完成幾何併入銀河、極氪整合領克等調整。此次收編雷達汽車，被視為推進「一個吉利」戰略、持續優化資源配置嘅又一重要舉措。
雷達汽車，盈利仍然喺爬坡期
雷達汽車由吉利控股喺四年前孵化，首款車型 RD6 上市後迅速佔據聲量。2025 年，該品牌以 1.304 萬輛嘅銷量成為唯一躋身皮卡全品類銷量前五嘅新能源品牌，純電細分市場份額一度高達 98%。
然而，雷達汽車尚未實現整體盈利。最新財務顯示，三家核心主體盈虧分化：全產業鏈運營嘅山東公司虧損收窄至 864.6 萬元，國內銷售公司已盈利 1232.5 萬元，而負責出海嘅 Radar Thailand 虧損擴大至 1069.7 萬元，整體仍處於投入階段。
同樣棘手嘅仲有市場嘅容量同競爭加劇。
2026 年一季度，國內新能源皮卡銷量僅 1.8 萬輛，滲透率不足 10%，增速遠低於整體皮卡市場。目前皮卡嘅主要增量喺海外，出口佔比已超過一半。
同時，賽道亦正在變擁擠。国内市场嚟睇，長城依舊牢牢佔據國內皮卡市場龍頭地位，2025 年全球銷量超 18.16 萬輛。比亞迪鯊魚皮卡早已率先深耕海外市場，月均外銷規模穩定喺 3000 輛左右，憑藉混動硬派產品力，喺東南亞、澳洲市場快速打開局面，唔幾耐前鯊魚品牌也被證實要進入國內皮卡市場一爭高下。
入局者仲喺不斷增加，長安加速佈局乘用化新能源皮卡，奇瑞亦依托威麟品牌完善純電、插混全品類皮卡產品矩陣。
喺呢個背景下，雷達皮卡喺新能源皮卡領域建立起來嘅優勢正不斷被消磨，之後喺競爭中能否繼續保持領先亦係未知數。
吉利大整合嘅又一下棋子
吉利集團正持續深化《台州宣言》嘅戰略落地。過去一年，集團整合動作頻繁：吉利銀河合併幾何品牌，極氪同領克完成股權交割並組建極氪科技集團，隨後併入吉利汽車。經此調整，集團品牌數量由 6 個精簡至 4 個，控股子公司由 3 家縮減為 1 家，完成咗一次深度嘅內部梳理。
此次收購雷達汽車將進一步拓寬吉利業務版圖。吉利相關負責人表示，將雷達歸入中國星旗下，意在完善豪華、中高端及大眾化市場嘅產品覆蓋，補齊皮卡品類，形成轎車、SUV、MPV、皮卡嘅完整矩陣，滿足用戶多樣化需求；從戰略價值嚟睇，此次收購標誌住新能源皮卡從集團層面嘅孵化項目，升級為上市公司核心戰略品類。
從價值項嚟睇，交易作價 2.18 億元，與標嘅公司評估公允價值基本持平，無溢價風險。吉利以較低成本將國內新能源皮卡頭部品牌收入麾下，既填補咗產品矩陣空白，亦為皮卡出海提供咗增長空間，體現咗高效嘅資源配置。
對雷達汽車嚟講，此前雖已佈局泰國市場，但獨立拓展海外面臨高成本同低效率嘅問題。依托吉利成熟嘅全球分銷網絡，雷達汽車可快速滲透更多市場，將技術勢能轉化咗銷量增量，加速實現規模盈利。
此外，雷達汽車注入上市公司體系，標誌住控股集團唔再分散管理同質化品牌，轉而將成熟業務交由核心板塊統一運營。呢次行動打通咗產品規劃、供應鏈及渠道資源，實現咗海外網絡嘅複用，有利於雷達品牌喺國內外市場嘅擴張及成本控制。
對此，業界人士認為，吉利採取「平台孵化 + 成熟回收」嘅模式，依托集團資源分擔初創品牌嘅早期風險，待佢喺細分市場穩固地位後再實施資產整合。呢個策略平衡咗風險控制同資產運營效率。
此次將雷達汽車納入上市體系，正係呢個戰略邏輯嘅又一次關鍵執行。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
