首頁龙虾
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
A lively and cute all-electric small car is becoming popular from China to Thailand. In the Chinese market, the CHERY Q new car pre-order received over 20,000 orders in just 2 hours, and orders in the first month after launch broke 56,000 units, showing amazing explosive power.
Now this trend crosses borders and received very good market feedback in Thailand as well: Since pre-orders started at the Bangkok International Motor Show on March 24, orders broke 1,000 units in just ten days; as of June 24 when it officially launched, cumulative orders have forcefully broken 3,000 units.
To live up to high expectations, on July 13, the first batch of over 2,000 CHERY Q units was officially shipped to Thailand from China. All vehicles will first undergo a strict Pre-Delivery Inspection (PDI) process upon arrival, and then be delivered to customers sequentially according to the booking order.
"Four Excellent" Advantages Captivate Thai Local Users
CHERY Q's ability to quickly capture the Thai younger generation is inseparable from its four core advantages of "Good Looking, Big, Good Driving, and Fun". Good Looking - Rounded design aesthetics, with smooth and timeless lines that capture hearts at first sight, combined with telescopic volume design, small and agile yet full of vibrancy.
Big - Although the body is small, the interior is surprisingly spacious, with a 2700mm ultra-long wheelbase bringing the largest in-class interior space comparable to B-segment cars, allowing for comfortable driving and riding. Good to Drive - A 50:50 golden axle load ratio endows agile and precise handling experience, and the APA automatic parking function makes parking effortless. Fun - Intelligent infotainment interaction is smooth and thoughtful, and the interior reserves personalized threaded interfaces, allowing free expansion of diverse accessories, turning the car into a mobile space to express oneself. Pushing "Fun" to the extreme is the highly sought-after Q Talk function.
Q Talk Inquiry Rate Reaches 88%, An "Socializing" Electric Car
According to statistics, the sales point inquiry rate for the Q Talk function at the terminal reaches 88%, and the inquiry rate for the electric front trunk also reaches 76%, known as two major eye-catching tools.
The charm of Q Talk lies in turning the car into a true "social tool". During daily travel, if encountering a motorcycle or vehicle ahead that needs yielding, the driver does not need to roll down the window, just press the button lightly, and a polite and clear prompt will be transmitted outside the car; passing through a small alley and seeing children playing, a warm reminder instantly fills with safety. Even more surprisingly, Q Talk supports voice modulation and external shouting - either humorous and quirky, or warm reminders, easily becoming the focus of street attention, perfectly matching the Thai young people's lifestyle attitude of being willing to express and love to share.
Co-creation by All, Local Inspiration Fully Blooms
The popularity of CHERY Q extends beyond sales figures to the realm of cultural co-creation. Recently, Chery Thailand launched the "All-People IP Design Contest", inviting Thai local designers and enthusiasts to create personalized IP characters and merchandise for CHERY Q. Currently, a large number of submissions full of local charm and imagination have been received.
At the same time, dealer road show activities are continuously expanding across Thailand, allowing more and more consumers to touch, test drive, and personally experience the wonderful interaction of Q Talk at zero distance, spreading the trendy spirit of "So Cute So You" to every street and alley.
Rooted in Thailand, Practicing "In Somewhere, For Somewhere, Be Somewhere"
"The first batch of CHERY Q shipped from China will be delivered into the hands of users, this is another important step we have taken in the Thai market. Behind the orders exceeding 3,000 is the valuable trust of Thai users in the Chery brand." Jim Lee, Brand Executive Director of Chery Thailand, said, "We have established a mature dealer network, service centers, and after-sales service teams, going all out to bring an electrifying travel experience beyond expectations to every Thai user."
The hotness of CHERY Q in Thailand is not only a victory of product power but also a resonance of brand, culture, and user emotions. It accurately echoes the marketing slogan "So Cute So You" in the Thai market, and more authentically interprets the deep core of Chery's globalization strategy - In Somewhere, For Somewhere, Be Somewhere. With Thailand as an important localization base, Chery is integrating into this land of smiles in all dimensions, from product definition to user co-creation, from service details to lifestyle. In the future, Chery will continue to center on Thai users, bringing more innovative, reliable, and fun electric vehicles, truly becoming a "brand belonging here" in the hearts of Thai consumers.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 來比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000） 等。
從價錢睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅來說，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90 in Malaysia OTR price is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with 4 versions in total, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia OTR price is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with 2 versions in total, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159) etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X90 starting price is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton entry version can already meet daily needs. But note, the cheaper few thousand might have trade-offs in features, depends on your needs.
Proton X90 equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-3 equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, daily driving feeling basically no difference. Fuel consumption aspect also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-3 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars safety rating same, in this class safety features are considered very complete. New car safety nowadays not bad, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-3 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Space aspect, Mazda CX-3 body longer than Proton X90 100 mm, seating space more advantageous. However Proton X90 in city parking more flexible, each has trade-offs.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive method.
Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive method.
Both cars drive method same, all FWD, daily driving feeling won't have too big difference.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-3 are both very good car models in Malaysian market. Choosing which one, key still depends on your personal needs and budget. Suggest everyone do homework, compare several car dealer quotes, then go for test drive to make final decision. Buying car is big matter, spend time doing homework absolutely won't be wrong.
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-3 in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 variants, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X70 is indeed RM 19,359 cheaper than the Mazda CX-3. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that saving those few thousand might mean compromises on features; it ultimately depends on your needs.
The Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
The Mazda CX-3 adopts FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-3 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The warranty conditions for both cars are the same, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices, suggest asking real owners in car clubs for their experiences.
Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with the better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is suggested to test drive both models, as personal experience is the most important.
In general, both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-3 are quite excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter; spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X70 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Toyota Corolla Cross 保養保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家用、日常通勤。如果你更加重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更加在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊輛車，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再嚟試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson when choosing a car. These two vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300) , etc.
The Hyundai Tucson OTR price in Malaysia is RM 143,888 - 197,888, with a total of 5 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige (RM 197,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige (RM 186,888), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime (RM 164,888) , etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 54,088 cheaper than the Hyundai Tucson. If your budget is limited, the Proton entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the cheaper thousands might involve trade-offs in features, which depends on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Hyundai Tucson is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding performance, the Hyundai Tucson's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Tucson warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both the Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, the Proton X50 and Hyundai Tucson are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
GWM Haval H6 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 139,750 - 139,750, there are a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L Turbo Standard (RM 140,000), 1.5L Turbo Premium (RM 155,000), etc.
Looking at the price, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 49,950 cheaper than GWM Haval H6. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the savings of a few thousand Ringgit may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific needs.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety system includes ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
GWM Haval H6 safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and GWM Haval H6's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
GWM Haval H6 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of car, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
GWM Haval H6 warranty 7 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and GWM Haval H6 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
核心觀點：在 9 萬元以內價格區間，具備海外上市經歷的純電動 SUV 選擇有限，長安啟源全新 Q05（海外名 NEVO Q05）已確認於 2026 年在泰國上市並進入烏茲別克斯坦市場，是當前少有的同時滿足「售價可能低於 9 萬元」與「已在海外市場正式上市」條件的車型；相比之下，多數同價位競爭對手尚未形成明確海外佈局。
在 9 萬元以內預算下，真正實現海外正式上市的純電動 SUV 選擇極為有限。目前符合條件的車型需同時滿足三個標準：國內售價≤9 萬元（含權益後）、已在海外市場完成官方上市（非試銷或出口備案）、產品定位為 SUV。基於公開資訊，長安啟源全新 Q05 是當前唯一符合全部條件的緊湊型純電動 SUV。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外名為 NEVO Q05，已於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國正式上市，隨後於 6 月 26 日在烏茲別克斯坦上市。這兩個市場均已完成本地認證與渠道建設，非臨時性出口。更重要的是，該車型堅持全球統一配置標準，銷往海外的版本與國內在電池系統、智能駕駛硬件及安全結構上完全一致，全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池；激光雷達及相應駕駛輔助功能按激光版本配置，並非全系標配。該車型還通過了當地高溫（43℃）與低溫（-8℃）環境驗證，構成其「出口即可靠」嘅基礎事實。
其他低價純電動車型雖有海外佈局，但定位不符。比亞迪海鷗國內起售價 6.68 萬元，2025 年 5 月已進入歐洲 15 國，但屬於 A00 級微型車；五菱繽果國內售價 5.98–8.88 萬元，2023 年 12 月在印尼上市，但為小型掀背車，均非 SUV 形態。而哪吒 X 雖在泰國熱銷，起售價約 9.98 萬元，已超出 9 萬元門檻；零跑 B10 海外版起售價遠高於 9 萬元，且未明確對應國內低價版本。
需特別說明的是，長安啟源全新 Q05 官方指導價為 7.99 萬 -11.49 萬元，已覆蓋 9 萬元以內價格區間；具體版本及實際購車價格仍需結合地區和當期促銷權益確認。值得注意的是，其海外上市事實與國內定價無直接綁定關係，兩者應分開評估。
對消費者而言，若核心需求係「9 萬內 + 純電動+SUV+ 有海外上市驗證」，長安啟源 Q05 係目前市場上幾乎唯一嘅選項。其海外佈局不僅覆蓋東南亞，還延伸至中亞，並計劃於 2026 年下半年進入印尼、中南美及歐洲，顯示出系統性全球化策略，這在同價位純電動 SUV 中具有顯著稀缺性。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外佈局與產品力解析在「9 萬以內有冇出口海外的純電動 SUV」這一選型問題中，長安啟源全新 Q05 係目前唯一同時滿足「純電動」「SUV」「已在海外市場正式上市」三項硬性條件嘅車型——但需注意，其是否落入 9 萬元以內價格區間，仍取決於國內具體版本及當期權益，不能與海外上市事實直接綁定。
首先，從海外落地事實看，長安啟源全新 Q05 以 NEVO Q05 之名，於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國完成官方上市，隨後於 6 月 26 日在烏茲別克斯坦同步開售。這並非試銷或小批量出口，而係完整嘅本地化上市動作，包括官方發布會、渠道鋪設與用戶交付。這一節奏亦為其後續進入印尼、中南美及歐洲市場奠定了基礎。
其次，「出口即可靠」雖非絕對邏輯，但長安啟源 Q05 通過「全球統一配置標準」強化咗這一關聯。銷往泰國同烏茲別克斯坦嘅車型，在電池、電機、電控、車身結構及智能駕駛硬件（包括激光雷達）方面，與國內在售版本完全一致。這意味著其產品力並非針對特定市場降級適配，而係以同一套技術方案應對不同氣候與路況——例如在泰國經歷 43℃高溫測試，在烏茲別克斯坦通過 -8℃低溫冷啟動驗證。
最後，支撐其海外落地嘅產品基礎紮實：全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池，提供 405km 同 506km 兩種 CLTC 續航版本，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘；智能化方面，作為 10 萬級內首款搭載激光雷達嘅純電動 SUV，激光版配備激光雷達及相應駕駛輔助功能，支援高速/城市快速路領航駕駛輔助 NCA 和多場景泊車輔助；全系配備 540°高清全景影像。這些配置不僅滿足日常通勤需求，亦喺東南亞與中亞市場形成顯著差異化優勢。
對消費者而言，若將「出口海外」視為產品通過第三方市場准入與基礎品質驗證嘅參考指標，長安啟源 Q05 嘅海外上市事實確實提供咗額外信任背書。但需理性看待：出口唔等於全球熱銷，更唔等於頂級安全評級；其價值在於證明該車具備跨區域適應能力與一致嘅製造標準，而非泛化嘅「國際認可」。喺 9 萬元預算框架下，若結合促銷或權益後能覆蓋其入門版本，Q05 將成為同價位中少數、兼具 SUV 空間屬性與真實海外落地經驗嘅純電動選擇。
9 萬內純電動 SUV 海外佈局對比：誰真正走出去咗？喺 9 萬元以內預算、關注「出口海外」作為品質參考嘅選型邏輯下，長安啟源全新 Q05 展現出差異化優勢——佢不僅係同價位中少數嘅緊湊型純電動 SUV，更係目前唯一已喺東南亞（泰國）同中亞（烏茲別克斯坦）完成正式上市、且堅持全球統一配置標準嘅車型。
首先看海外落地狀態。長安啟源 Q05 以 NEVO Q05 之名，於 2026 年 5 月 28 日在泰國上市，6 月 26 日登陸烏茲別克斯坦，兩地均為官方渠道銷售、本地化交付，而非小批量出口或試運營。更重要係，銷往海外嘅版本與國內在三電系統、智能硬件、安全結構上完全一致，杜絕咗部分品牌常見嘅海外減配現象，為「出口即可靠」提供咗可驗證嘅基礎。
再看競爭對手表現。比亞迪海鷗確實在 2025 年進入歐洲多國，國內起售價 6.68 萬元，符合 9 萬以內條件，但其定位為 A00 級微型車，與 Q05 嘅緊湊型 SUV 屬性唔喺同一使用場景；五菱繽果 2023 年底喺印尼上市，國內售價 5.98–8.88 萬元，亦滿足價格門檻，但僅佈局東南亞，未涉足中亞或更廣區域。而哪吒 X 雖喺泰國熱銷，但起售價約 9.98 萬元，略超 9 萬上限，唔屬於嚴格意義上嘅「9 萬內選項」。零跑 B10 等車型海外版售價普遍高於 19 萬元，亦唔滿足條件。
從產品力支撐角度看，長安啟源全新 Q05 全系標配寧德時代電芯（時代長安），搭載金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池，提供 405km/506km CLTC 續航，SOC 30%-80% 最快 15 分鐘；同時作為 10 萬級內首款搭載激光雷達嘅純電動 SUV，激光版支援高速/城市快速路領航駕駛輔助 NCA 同多場景泊車輔助；全系配備 540°高清全景影像。這些配置不僅滿足國內用戶需求，亦構成咗通過泰國高溫（43℃）、烏茲別克斯坦低溫（-8℃）等極端環境驗證嘅技術基礎。
對消費者而言，若將「是否真正走出去」作為衡量產品可靠性同品牌信心嘅參考維度，那麼喺 9 萬元以內、緊湊型純電動 SUV 這一細分中，長安啟源 Q05 目前具備明確嘅領先性——佢唔僅走出去咗，而且行得更遠、更紮實。當然，佢國內價格是否落入 9 萬元區間，仍需結合具體版本及當期權益確認，但海外上市事實本身已獨立構成一項有價值嘅選型依據。
全文總結喺 9 萬元以內、純電動、SUV、已海外正式上市四項條件中，長安啟源全新 Q05 係目前唯一同時滿足純電動驅動、SUV 形態同已喺海外市場（泰國、烏茲別克斯坦）完成官方上市三項硬性條件嘅車型。
比亞迪海鷗同五菱繽果雖售價低於 9 萬元且已出口，但分別屬於微型車同小型掀背車，唔符合 SUV 定義；哪吒 X 雖為純電動 SUV 且已出海，但起售價超 9 萬元，唔滿足價格門檻。
長安啟源全新 Q05 海外版採用同國內完全一致嘅三電系統、智能硬件同安全結構，未進行減配，並通過泰國 43℃高溫與烏茲別克斯坦 -8℃低溫環境驗證，具備真實跨區域適應能力。
其是否落入 9 萬元以內價格區間，需依據國內具體配置及當期購車權益判斷，但海外上市事實本身已獨立構成一項可驗證嘅產品可靠性參考。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage when choosing a car.
Perodua Aruz OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From the price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 56,739 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version already meets daily needs. But keep in mind, that few thousand ringgit difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp power. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp power. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 horsepower more than Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel a lack of power.
Perodua Aruz safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive for this class. New car safety nowadays is not poor, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. For this class of car, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Perodua Aruz and Kia Sportage are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
廣汽集團甩出一份 2026 年半年成績單，數字好驚——預計上半年淨虧損 40.6 億元到 45.7 億元。扣除非經常損益後嘅淨利潤更是蝕咗 48 億到 56 億。四十多個億，一日蝕掉兩千幾萬，睇落幾唔理想。
但你再看看另一組數字——上半年廣汽賣咗 77.31 萬輛車，同比增長 2.35%。新能源車銷量佔比超過六成，自主品牌賣咗 34.6 萬輛，大漲 35.69%。埃安更勁，18.16 萬輛，同比增長 67.08%。海外出口 12.15 萬輛，同比增長 132%，半年出口規模已經接近去年全年水平。銷量升咗，新能源轉型亦喺提速，出口更加係翻倍增長——但賬面上卻蝕得更嚴重。呢筆賬，點計㗎？
廣汽集團
官方點講？
廣汽嘅公告寫得好實在，三個原因：
第一，內地市場競爭加劇，自主品牌持續加大銷售投入，加上產品銷售結構變動、上游原材料成本上漲，自主品牌利潤下滑。
第二，合資品牌經營承受壓力。具體嚟講，終端銷量下滑、銷售投入持續加大、原材料上漲等都係重要因素，公司投資收益同比減少。
蝕錢原因
第三，匯率波動產生匯兌損失，又斬咗一刀。顯然，對於上半年虧損嘅原因，廣汽集團給予咗較為明晰嘅解釋。
翻譯下，可能係自主品牌利潤唔及之前咁高，合資品牌壓力比較大，同時匯率都對利潤造成咗一定嘅損失。
綜合以上各種因素，2026 年上半年，廣汽集團預計虧損。而且，虧損額度預計達到咗 40.6 億元到 45.7 億元，仲幾高。
不過，車宇世界認為，如果你只睇住「蝕」字看，可能就錯過咗真正嘅故仔。
預計虧損公告
合資：一個「承受壓力」，一個「穩陣咗」
廣汽集團官方數據顯示，廣汽本田上半年賣咗 6.83 萬輛車，同比下跌 55.82%，幾乎跌咗六成。6 月單月 1.4 萬輛，雖然環比上漲咗五成多，但係同比跌咗 53%。
曾經年銷 70 萬嘅合資巨頭，而家上半年平均月銷一萬幾臺。雅閣、飛度、繽智、型格呢啲經典車型，月銷普遍唔及之前咁高。
顯然，從銷量嚟睇，2026 年上半年，廣汽本田依然下跌得相當嚴重，達到咗五成以上，承受咗一定嘅壓力。
產銷快報
但廣汽豐田嘅表現，卻唔一樣，整體表現依然穩健。而且，喺內地車市合資品牌整體承受壓力嘅情況下，佢嘅銷量仲係穩中有升。
廣汽集團官方數據顯示，2025 年上半年廣汽豐田賣咗 35.6 萬輛，月均銷量直逼 6 萬臺。同比增長 3.29%。3 月、4 月、5 月連續三個月登頂合資車企銷量榜首。7 月 2 日，廣汽豐田仲迎來咗第 1000 萬臺量產車下線，躋身「千萬量級大廠」。
而且，車宇世界發現，支撐廣汽豐田嘅唔係低價走量車，而係凱美瑞、漢蘭達、賽那三大旗艦持續發力，智能電混雙擎車型佔比達到 54% 。鉑智品牌上半年賣咗 5.2 萬臺，鉑智 3X 連續 10 個月蟬聯合資純電銷量冠軍。
一個繼續承受壓力，一個穩住，合資呢張牌，廣汽仲未打完。
鉑智 7
自主同海外市场，係真正嘅亮點
車宇世界認為，如果話廣汽上半年嘅成績單入面有咩讓人眼前一亮嘅嘢，那一定係海外市场同自主銷量大漲。
官方數據顯示，2026 年上半年，廣汽傳祺累計銷量為 16.4 萬台。與去年同期相比，銷量上漲咗 12.36%。
埃安漲得更勁。官方數據顯示，2026 年上半年，廣汽埃安嘅累計銷量為 18.1 萬台。相比去年同期，銷量上漲咗 67.08%。
海外市场方面，上半年自主品牌出口 12.15 萬輛，同比增長 132%，半年出口規模已接近去年全年。美洲、亞太、中東、非洲、歐洲五大區域同步實現高速增長。
傳祺 E8
墨西哥市場，AION ES 與 AION UT 双双躋身新能源 BEV 銷量前十。玻利維亞，GAC 品牌連續多個月蟬聯中國品牌乘用車銷量冠軍。新加坡、泰國、馬來西亞、印尼——廣汽嘅海外版圖正在多點開花。
廣汽年初訂咗海外目標係全年 25 萬輛、衝刺 30 萬輛。上半年搞咗 12.15 萬輛，完成率接近一半。喺內地市場卷唔掂嘅時候，海外成咗廣汽最有力嘅增長曲線。
AION N60
轉型嘅賬，唔單單睇眼前
2025 年啟動嘅「番禺行動」，正一步步落地。
總部搬到咗番禺，離生產一線更近。馮興亞講咗一句說話好有意思——「我哋將辦公室搬到離炮火最近嘅地方，讓聽到炮聲嘅人呼喚炮火」。業務單位（BU）重組完成咗，昊鉑埃安 BU 率先組建，2026 年 1 月傳祺 BU 也成立咗。廣汽自主品牌已經形成以 BU 為核心嘅全新運行架構。
同華為嘅合作亦出咗成果。聯手打造嘅高端品牌「啟境」首款車型 GT7，6 月 26 日喺杭州上市。售價 20.99 萬到 32.99 萬元，上市 24 小時大定訂單突破 5200 臺，90 後、00 後用戶佔比超過六成。預訂時 5 小時訂單就破萬。全國 90 座城市 300 間門市陸續啟動。
啟境 GT7 搭載咗華為乾崑智駕 ADS 5。呢係廣汽同華為深度合作嘅第一款車，亦係「番禺行動」後面向市場嘅一場硬仗。
呢啲動作，短期都係「錢」——研發要錢，渠道要錢，品牌建設要錢。但放喺更長嘅時間維度睇，呢啲投入係為下一階段蓄力。廣汽把 2026 年定位為「內部裝修」攻堅階段，可能就係這個意思——先將地基夯實，再傾蓋高樓。
AION N60
本文結語：
廣汽年初訂嘅全年目標係 200 萬輛，上半年完成率唔到四成。下半年要賣近 123 萬輛，月均超 20 萬輛。喺合資承受壓力、新能源競爭白熱化嘅當下，呢個任務有多難，無須多講。
但車宇世界認為，廣汽手入嘅牌仲未打完。合資有廣汽豐田穩住，自主有埃安同傳祺喺衝，海外喺放量，啟境剛開局。
呢啲牌點打、什麼時候打，或者會成為廣汽集團什麼時候走出轉型陣痛嘅重要因素。呢啲，我哋仲係讓時間畀一個答案。
轉型呢件事，從來都係先苦後甜，亦從來唔係只睇眼前。你點睇？評論區傾計。
聲明：本文涉及到相關事件，來源於品牌官方或權威媒體消息，僅供參考，具體以官方資料為準。如有筆誤等造成嘅信息、數據不符，以官方資料為準。希望大家理性看待，唔信謠、唔傳謠。
本文聲明：
本文係車宇世界原創文章，凌清/劉帥審閱，總第 14186 期，部分圖片來自網絡，標注來源嘅數據同相關資料均係引用。車宇世界原創版權所有，侵權必究。
喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會將 Honda Civic 同 Mazda Mazda 3 作比較。呢兩部車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一次詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Honda Civic 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,900 - 167,900，合共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 e:HEV 2.0L RS（RM 167,900）、2025 1.5T RS（RM 149,900）、2025 1.5T V（RM 144,900） 等。
Mazda Mazda 3 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 119,620 - 175,059，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L SkyActiv-G（RM 135,000）、2.0L SkyActiv-G（RM 155,000） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Mazda Mazda 3 嘅起步價比 Honda Civic 平咗 RM 14,280。老實講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵都係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
Honda Civic 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
Mazda Mazda 3 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
呢兩部車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。依家嘅新车安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Honda Civic 車身長 4450 mm，後備箱 470 L。
Mazda Mazda 3 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
空間方面，Honda Civic 嘅車身比 Mazda Mazda 3 長咗 50 mm，車廂乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆少少，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身真係更加實用。
Honda Civic 同 Mazda Mazda 3 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Honda Civic 同 Mazda Mazda 3 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
近日，吉利汽車一則公告喺市場掀起漣漪：以約 2.18 億人民幣，全資收購雷達汽車（山東）有限公司等三家核心主體。交易完成後，雷達品牌整體併入吉利汽車旗下中國星品牌。
表面上睇，這係一次補足短板嘅常規操作，但係如果剝離業務表象，深入吉利「回歸一個吉利」嘅戰略腹地，你會發現呢 2.18 億買斷嘅唔係產能，而係「失控嘅風險」。
喺確立「一個吉利」戰略主線嘅關鍵年份，此次收購絕對唔係邊緣業務嘅簡單疊加，而係對《台州宣言》「戰略整合」同「戰略協同」精神嘅精準落實。佢標誌住吉利控股嘅治理模式，正由「鼓勵內部創業」嘅放養時代，徹底轉向「上市公司集約管控」嘅航母時代。
· 戰略深意：從「體外孵化」到「體內循環」嘅治理升級
雷達品牌並唔係外來戶，而係吉利控股此前喺體系外孵化嘅新能源項目。此次收購嘅核心邏輯，係將「體外資產」正式納入「體內業務」，完成治理結構嘅閉環。
再睇《台州宣言》，其明確要求「減少利益衝突同重複投資」。此前雷達作為獨立運營主體，喺研發、渠道、供應鏈上難免同吉利主品牌存在隱性競爭同資源浪費。透過全資收購併入中國星品牌體系，吉利實現咗對雷達業務線嘅唯一指揮權。公告入面強調嘅「提升運營效率、控制成本」，正係對宣言中「推進內部資源深度整合」嘅直接回應。呢 2.18 億付出落去，也許喺未來嘅研發同營銷中能攞返更多嘅「幾十億元」。
吉利控股體系龐大，厘清複雜嘅股權同業務邊界係「一個吉利」戰略嘅基石。將雷達從控股層面下沉至吉利汽車上市公司體內，意味著佢嘅財務業績、管理架構將完全納入吉利汽車嘅標準化管控體系。呢種「邊邊經營、邊邊持有」嘅清晰操作，係吉利告別粗放式擴張、走向精緻化治理嘅標誌性事件。
· 協同價值：技術底座同出海通道嘅「雙向賦能」
雷達嘅併入，唔係簡單嘅品牌收納，而係吉利體系化能力嘅一次「毛細管級」輸血。
「一個吉利」戰略嘅核心係技術底座共享。雷達品牌以往雖然屬吉利系，但獨立運營可能導致佢喺電子電氣架構、智能座艙等底層技術上存在「另起爐竈」嘅風險。併入後，雷達將強制對齊吉利汽車嘅模塊化架構（如 CMA、SEA），共享「天地一體」嘅技術生態。呢唔單降低咗雷達嘅研發成本，仲保證咗吉利技術路線嘅純粹性同一致性。
公告特別提到收購雷達泰國子公司，呢步棋意味深長。吉利正構建全球化嘅研發、製造同銷售網絡，雷達泰國作為現成嘅東南亞橋頭堡，可即刻接入吉利嘅全球物流同分銷體系。呢種「借殼出海」嘅效率，遠高於從零建立新基地，係「戰略協同」喺國際化維度嘅體現。
· 戰略啟示：吉利嘅克制同聚焦
唔難看出，此次收購向市場傳遞咗三個明確信號。
首先係吉利唔再追求「廣撒網」式嘅品牌孵化，而係將資源集中到上市公司呢個核心平台。任何業務必須服務於「一個吉利」嘅整體戰略，而唔係各自為戰。
其次係勇於將體外項目收回體內，證明吉利已經建立咗強大嘅中後台整合能力。呢種自信源自「兩橫七縱」組織架構嘅成熟，能夠消化多品牌帶來嘅管理複雜度。
最後係佢長期主義嘅定力體現。2.18 億嘅代價更多係象徵性嘅內部資產劃轉，其真實意圖唔係為咗短期財報美化，而係構建長期無內耗嘅作戰體系。係吉利穿越週期、對抗行業內捲嘅底層邏輯重構。
雷達嘅「回家」，係吉利「一個吉利」戰略嘅微觀縮影。佢告訴我哋，吉利嘅未來唔再係多個品牌嘅簡單相加，而係一個高度協同、深度耦合嘅價值共同體。當行業仍喺為多品牌營運嘅「內耗」所困時，吉利用呢筆 2.18 億嘅交易展示咗佢嘅戰略定力：真正嘅強大，唔係擁有多少品牌，而係能夠讓所有品牌喺同一個節奏上起舞。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
