首頁饮食
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X90 同 Honda HR-V 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900）等。
從價錢睇落，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 9,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Honda HR-V 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開埋嘅感覺基本冇分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X90 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X90 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X90 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
Proton X90 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總嘅嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一個，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 32,609 cheaper than Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the savings of a few thousand ringgit might involve trade-offs in specifications, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating for Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating for Mazda CX-30 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays generally have good safety, so no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, boot 400 L.
Mazda CX-30 body length is 4500 mm, boot 450 L.
In terms of space, the body of Mazda CX-30 is 100 mm longer than Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, parking Proton X50 in the city is a bit more flexible; each has its trade-offs.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, so no need to agonize over this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is suggested to ask real owners in car communities for their experience.
Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation. If you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. In the end, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mazda CX-30 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a significant matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面嚟做一个詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400） 等等。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等等。
由價錢嚟睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起步價確實比 Proton X70 平咗 RM 44,300。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需要。
Perodua Ativa 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Proton X70 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嗰陣都會用 Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價格同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，總共有 4 個版本，包含 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，總共有 2 個版本，包含 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等。
睇返價錢嚟講，Proton X90 嘅起步價真係比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。
Proton X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X90 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有些分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X90 車身長度 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長度 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差唔多。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
Proton X90 保養保修 5 年/150,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 保養保修 3 年/100,000 公里，保養間隔 每 10,000 公里或 6 個月。
Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。
總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。买车係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎豐田 Harrier 同奧迪 Q7 嚟做比較。
豐田 Harrier 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 289,000 - 289,000，總共有 1 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard（RM 289,000） 等。
奧迪 Q7 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 462,222 - 462,222，總共有 1 個版本，包括 Standard（RM 462,222） 等。
睇返價錢，豐田 Harrier 嘅起價真係比奧迪 Q7 平咗 RM 173,222。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
豐田 Harrier 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
奧迪 Q7 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩部車都攞到唔錯嘅評級。不過豐田 Harrier 嘅 Brand ADAS 同奧迪 Q7 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能清單。
豐田 Harrier 保用 5 年/無限里數，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奧迪 Q7 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Harrier 同奧迪 Q7 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩部都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要嘅。
總括嚟講，豐田 Harrier 同奧迪 Q7 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
萬事得3 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講高速巡航、併線同超車信心，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
完稅價 HK$ 229,990 - 249,990 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
萬事得3 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 229,990 - 249,990 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 Fastback 2.0L MT Advance（HK$ 249,990）、2025 Fastback 2.0L AT Advance（HK$ 249,990）、2025 Sedan 1.5L AT Advance（HK$ 229,990）、2025 Fastback 2.0L AT i-Plus（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 萬事得3 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
自然進氣、4 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 165 Ps / 121.3 kW / 120 Ps / 88.2 kW、213/153 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4460/4660 mm、車闊 1795 mm、車高 1435/1440 mm、軸距 2725 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手動(MT) / 自動(AT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
萬事得3 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 萬事得3 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Mazda3 喺香港有咩引擎選擇？」簡單講，Mazda3 喺香港主要有兩個引擎選擇。入門版係 1.5 公升 Skyactiv-G 四缸自然吸氣引擎，輸出 120 匹馬力及 153 Nm 扭力。另外仲有 2.0 公升 Skyactiv-G 版本，輸出 165 匹馬力及 21.7 kgm 扭力，適合追求更強動力嘅用家。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 萬事得3 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 229,990 - 249,990 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 萬事得3 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
凌志ES 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講日常駕駛是否容易上手，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「Lexus 全新ES車型專屬Modellista改裝套件正式發售」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
完稅價 HK$ 559,920 - 609,069 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
凌志ES 嘅購車預算可以先由 完稅價 HK$ 559,920 - 609,069 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 300h Executive（HK$ 559,920）、2025 300h Premium（HK$ 609,069） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 凌志ES 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
凌志ES 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
凌志ES 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較。
要留意嘅係，最終取捨會落喺版本配置、保險同長期保養成本。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 凌志ES 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Lexus ES 喺香港賣幾錢？」簡單講，Lexus ES 300h 喺香港嘅售價大約由港幣 $559,920 起。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 凌志ES 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 完稅價 HK$ 559,920 - 609,069 鎖定預算圈。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 凌志ES 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
