首頁鄱阳湖
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 variants in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, there are 2 variants in total, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 69,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand less might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X50 equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省低做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360，一共有 5 個版本，包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol（RM 201,360）、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel（RM 193,123）、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol（RM 186,360） 等。
睇返價錢，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 75,560。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-8 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-8 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-8 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算俾得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mazda 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有不同感覺，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最緊要。
總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建议大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-30 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-30 平咗 RM 49,509。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嘅那幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-30 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-30 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保修條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就選配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Mazda CX-30 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
Describing the 2026 Chinese auto market as "brutal" is hardly an exaggeration.
The density of new car launches is staggering — over 600 new models launched nationwide in the first half, averaging 3 new cars entering the market daily. However, in sharp contrast to the product explosion, the overall market continues to shrink. According to CPCA statistics, domestic passenger car retail in the first half reached 10.318 million units, a year-on-year decline of 6.2%; other data shows cumulative retail of approximately 8.75 million units, with a drop as high as 20%. Li Bin of NIO stated explicitly at the Chongqing Forum that the industry needs to prepare for a year-on-year decline in annual retail volume of 15% to 20%. Market downturn, price war intensification, elimination round acceleration — this is the true background of the first half of 2026.
However, precisely in such a headwind situation, automakers with true system capabilities stand out. Compared to the high-profile battles of new forces on the public opinion field, the strategies of traditional automakers are steadier and results more solid. Geely Automobile is the most typical representative.
Data from CPCA shows that in the first half of 2026, Geely Automobile's terminal retail sales in the domestic narrow passenger car market reached 1.021 million units, topping the Chinese passenger car domestic sales champion at once, and also being the only domestic brand to break the 1 million unit sales mark. Adding overseas markets, cumulative total vehicle sales for Geely from January to June reached 1.423 million units, setting a new historical high for the same period.
The gold content of this achievement lies in that it was not supported by a single hit product, but the result of four brand matrices exerting balanced effort and layered positioning.
First, look at the main position of new energy Geely Galaxy. Cumulative sales reached nearly 520,000 units in the first half, with single-month sales in June breaking through 108,000 units. Among them, Geely Star Wish sales in June exceeded 50,000 units, retaining the title of China all-brand all-category model sales champion. What does this mean? A 100,000-level home new energy vehicle with monthly sales of 50,000+, placed in the entire passenger car market, is a ceiling-level existence. More worthy of attention is Star Wish's global strategy - domestic sales volume amortizes costs, overseas relies on product power for high premium, priced at 160,000 to 180,000 Yuan in the Brazilian market, exports in June accounted for 40% of its own total sales. Star Wish has not only become a legend in China, but also won sales champions in sub-categories in multiple countries such as Mexico and Indonesia. This "domestic volume + overseas premium" dual-wheel drive is the key to Geely's new energy segment being able to continue profitable.
Look at the high-end brand Zeekr next. Deliveries exceeded 178,000 units in the first half, a year-on-year increase of 97%. Its luxury 9 Series flagship model delivered nearly 150,000 units cumulatively - for every 3 luxury Chinese cars sold above 500,000 Yuan, 1 is a Zeekr 9X. The average transaction price of the entire Zeekr series has approached 350,000 Yuan, tearing a hole in the luxury car market where BBA has long dominated. This is not share won by low prices, but solid product power completing brand positioning in the high-end market.
Lynk & Co sales exceeded 144,000 units in the first half, continuing to expand. In the 150,000 to 300,000 Yuan sporty, globalized sub-sectors, continuously widening layout. And the China Star Series sales exceeded 580,000 units in the first half, consecutively retaining the title of Chinese brand fuel passenger car sales champion for 9 years. In today when almost all automakers are "abandoning fuel for electricity", Geely not only did not let the fuel car base collapse, but instead made the China Star Series a banner for domestic brand fuel cars.
Running on two legs, fuel and new energy, this is extremely rare among current Chinese automakers. The problem facing the vast majority of brands is: new energy grew, but fuel cars collapsed. Geely did not sacrifice cash flow and the basic base for new energy transformation - Galaxy responsible for volume expansion, Zeekr responsible for brand upward, Lynk & Co responsible for high-end electrification, China Star responsible for stabilizing the fuel base. Four brands perform their duties, not fighting each other, jointly constituting the underlying support for Geely's 1.021 million unit sales.
From a more macro dimension, Geely's growth logic is clearer. In the first half, cumulative new energy sales reached 799,500 units, penetration rate reached 56%, June single-month penetration rate even surged to 67%. Overseas market became the biggest variable - June exports 102,900 units, breaking through the single-month 100,000 unit threshold for the first time, skyrocketing 157% year-on-year; first half cumulative exports 474,200 units, 158% year-on-year increase, already exceeding the total export volume of 2025. In the context of domestic market shrinkage, overseas effectively offset the downward pressure of the local market.
More worthy of mention is that Geely is not a champion rushed out by "trading price for volume". The terminal retail data of 1.021 million units reflects real market demand, rather than warehouse-pressing wholesale numbers. In terms of product structure, the mainstream price range of 100,000 to 200,000 Yuan constitutes the main body of sales; in terms of brand structure, the four blocks of Galaxy, Zeekr, Lynk & Co, and China Star all achieved positive growth or steady progress. This growth quality of "volume and price rising together" is far more convincing than simple sales numbers.
Looking forward to the second half, Galaxy TT and Galaxy Warship 700 are about to launch, and i-HEV hybrid model production capacity will also increase. Especially Galaxy Warship 700 - developed based on Geely's native new energy off-road architecture, equipped with three-motor four-wheel drive system and AI intelligent four-wheel drive technology - this tough plug-in hybrid SUV is expected to add another spark to the emerging off-road new energy track. And i-HEV intelligent dual-engine as the world's first application of "AI Cloud Power" oil-electric hybrid system, can reduce HEV model fuel consumption to 3L per 100km, which will further consolidate Geely's technical moat in the hybrid field.
In the first half of 2026, Geely proved one thing with the 1.021 million unit terminal retail data: In the cycle of major industry reshuffling, those who can truly cross the cycle are never reliant on one or two viral products, but on a mature, balanced, sustainable product matrix and brand system.
Geely Automobile Group CEO Fan Jiayue once systematically expounded Geely's strategic determination to adhere to "long-termism" in the AI era; Li Shufu explicitly proposed to "forge a management team and an enterprise culture capable of fighting a war of attrition strategically". From "quantity expansion" to "quality leap", from multi-brand tactics to "One Geely" system integration - this automaker that has walked for forty years is proving in the most pragmatic way: Enterprises adhering to long-termism often walk further and more solidly.
在馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X50 同 本田 HR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
本田 HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
從價錢睇，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確係比 本田 HR-V 平咗 RM 26,100。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能會喺配備上有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
寶騰 X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
本田 HR-V 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，本田 HR-V 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都足夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李箱 400 L。
本田 HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李箱 450 L。
空間方面，本田 HR-V 嘅車身比 寶騰 X50 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 寶騰 X50 喺城市入面停車會靈活少少，各有取捨。
寶騰 X50 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 HR-V 保用 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同 本田 HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
