August 12, Chery Fengyun series launch event didn't mention "disrupting the industry", only "slow work builds good cars". This pre-sale event themed "Slow work builds good cars, sorry for the wait", cramped all 23 years of global accumulation, 6 million km of global road tests into one new car—Global quality pure electric SUV Fengyun T7 officially opened pre-sale, 3 versions pre-sale price 109,900-129,900 RMB, simultaneously released 7 layers of purchase benefits.

First, the baseline: Hard safety, even harder protection

For the trust threshold of pure electric cars, Fengyun T7 chooses to cross it with "Over-spec safety + Real protection". It directly benchmarks the 2026 E-NCAP five-star standard, functional safety reaches ASIL D highest level, to verify reliability, Chery invested 81 dedicated durability vehicles, whole vehicle cumulative test mileage exceeds 6 million km, special durability actual test 1.45 million km, specifically run through Southeast Asian rainy season, Middle East high heat, Indonesia high humidity and other extreme conditions.

Steel and iron bones are the base color: 80% high-strength steel, 18.84% hot-formed steel welded into a nine-transverse five-longitudinal cage body, equipped with dual-frame subframe and Pack crash beam, total 15 collision force transmission paths front and rear, fully protect the passenger compartment during collision; all series 9 airbags, includes 48L dual-chamber remote airbag and rear side airbag, even covering the rear side. Rhino battery comes with 6D protection, IP68 waterproof ability is 96 times the national standard, waterproof in heavy rain without short circuit.

More practical is the after-sales "insurance ticket": vehicle damage due to thermal runaway caused by battery reasons, directly compensate for a new same model car; within one year of purchase, accidents caused by intelligent driving system in parking or pilot scenarios, highest compensation 5 million Yuan. Plus whole vehicle lifetime warranty (including three-electrics), and 666 Yuan exchange for lifetime basic maintenance, no hidden costs in car maintenance.

All series 600km: No range grading games, run in cold and heat

Refuse the industry trick of "low spec range cut in half", Fengyun T7 all series standard equipment 65.05kWh Rhino battery, CLTC range 600km, actual test can run 667km+, belongs to typical "reverse false marking". Energy replenishment efficiency is also in place, 30% to 80% charge only needs 20 minutes, long distance not delayed.

To adapt to global climates, it installed global integrated dual-source wide heat pump AC + High voltage PTC, -30°C to 55°C wide temperature range can work stably, North winter heating saves electricity, South summer heat dissipation efficient; plus AGS intelligent grille and 14 low wind resistance optimizations, high and low speed energy consumption are stable, no anxiety of "winter halved performance".

Cabin and driving integration: 100k level uses 8775 flagship chip

Smart is not compromised, is Fengyun T7's another card. It is equipped with 4nm process cabin-driving integrated 8775 chip, 72 TOPS computing power, response only needs 80ms, boot speed improved 33%, car machine smooth no lag. 15.6-inch 2.5K HD large screen anti-glare, anti-fingerprint, supports CarPlay, HUAWEI HiCar, CarLink wireless interconnection, cover 99%+ mobile phones, connect seamless upon getting on board.

Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 has 6 types of human-like voice characters, from "Xiao Qi Tongxue" to "Northeast Auntie", can chat and can control car; built-in nap, camping, pet and other 6 major scenario modes, car is mobile rest lounge also entertainment cabin. Intelligent driving equipped with Falcon 500 system, 22 high-precision sensors cover 300+ parking scenarios, dead end, cross-floor, track reverse all handled, newbies can also park accurately.

Master tuning + Can load and lie: Everything home needs given enough

Drive not floating, sit not tired, this car knits home attributes to details. Chassis led by former Maserati tuning experts team polished, 50.8:49.2 golden axle load ratio, plus Chery 2026 year-end chassis foundation and self-developed K&C test bench, cornering no understeer, no oversteer, vibration filtering crisp.

In terms of space, 2700mm wheelbase achieves 84% room rate, rear pure flat floor, leg space 911mm, full load not crowded; rear seats folded is 1955mm pure flat big bed, trunk from 450L expanded to 1550L, whole car 38 storage compartments, plus 4 bearing 300kg rivet rings, 2 bearing 3kg hooks, camping gear, large luggage can be stably stored. 9 layer cloud feeling seats with ventilation heating, under -20°C 5 minutes can heat to 30°C, summer sucking wind ventilation not stuffy sweat, long distance sitting not tired.

Global co-creation look: Endurable to look, more durable

Good looking is not for a while, is looking not tired forever. Fengyun T7 by Chery 10 major global design centers, 5000+ domestic and overseas users co-created, same origin model Lepas L6 once appeared at Milan Design Week. Appearance is wind control front grille, wind shaped satin body, sky light tailgate, in 6 color schemes hot flame orange, mountain smoke purple, cloud pink rice very photogenic, paint surface according to overseas strict weather resistance standards built, long sun exposure no fading.

Interior has warm black brown, polar night black obsidian two styles, cloud wing hugging cockpit covered large area soft packaging, pebble floating speakers, diamond quilting details show texture; all leather, sealing strips, plastic parts all did anti-aging treatment, yearly use not harden sticky, drive 3-5 years interior still new.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拎 Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 黎做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上幾接近，今日我哋就多方面做個詳細比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800）等。

Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等。

由價錢睇，Proton X90 嘅起步價確實比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。

配備同科技

Proton X90 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Honda CR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

保養同維修

Proton X90 保養保固 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Honda CR-V 保養保固 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

適合邊類人

Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X90 同 Honda CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV when choosing a car.

Price and Variants

Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 variants, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 variants, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.

From a price perspective, Proton X70's starting price is indeed RM 52,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, horsepower 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.

Regarding power, Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Hybrid has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily driving in the city, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel it lacks power.

Safety Features

Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.

In terms of safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV's Basic have some differences in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.

Maintenance and Service

Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV warranty 3 years/100,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Conclusion

Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one, the key depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research is never wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾近嘅，今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。

MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。

從價錢嚟看，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。

動力同油耗

Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

安全配備

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。

MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。

安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X50 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。

配備同科技

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。

MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

Proton 嘅 4WD 同 MG 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。

適合邊種人

Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總結

總體嚟講，Proton X50 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就由多個方面做一次詳細比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。

價錢和版本

Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。

Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以用家居電源插座充電嗎？（RM 117,478） 等。

從價錢來看，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 39,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需要。

空間同舒適度

Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。

兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。

保養同維修

Proton X50 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

適合邊種人

Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終始終建議兩款都去試駕，親身嘗試先係最重要嘅。

總結

總嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行之嘅報價，先去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare the Proton X50 and the Honda HR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.

Price and Versions

The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.

The Honda HR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 115,900 - 143,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS (RM 143,900), 2026 1.5T V (RM 137,900), 2026 1.5T E (RM 130,900), etc.

From a price perspective, the Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 26,100 cheaper than the Honda HR-V. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version is already enough to meet daily needs. But note that that few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Power and Fuel Consumption

The Proton X50 is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cylinder, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.

The Honda HR-V is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.

In terms of power, the Honda HR-V's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cylinder. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel it's underpowered.

Space and Comfort

The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.

The Honda HR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.

In terms of space, the Honda HR-V's body is 100 mm longer than the Proton X50, giving it an advantage in passenger space. However, the Proton X50 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Who is it suitable for

Both the Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, we suggest test driving both, as personal experience is the most important.

Conclusion

Overall, both the Proton X50 and Honda HR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返啲做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900）等。

MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，合共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000）等。

由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起頭價真係比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 57,550。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經滿足日常需要。不過都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體就要睇你嘅需要。

動力同油耗

Perodua Aruz 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。

MG MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

動力方面，MG MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Aruz 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過平日喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。

配置同科技

Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

MG MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。

兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有大分別。

保養同維護

Perodua Aruz 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

MG MG HS 保用 7 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

適合邊種人

Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在乎性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都好建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至最重要。

總結

總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

According to Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute data, from Jan-May 2026, exports of Chinese passenger cars and new energy passenger cars continued to show high growth, but regional differentiation intensified further. Regarding passenger car exports, Brazil continued to hold the top spot, with Russia following closely, the two countries accounting for more than 40% of the total in the top ten; the European market performed steadily, achieving high growth; while the Latin America and Middle East markets entered a period of deep adjustment.

New energy passenger car exports performed even more strongly. Brazil led by a large margin, Belgium jumped to second place, highlighting its status as a European transit hub; the European market occupied five seats in the top ten. Among them, Italy and Germany achieved explosive breakthroughs with growth rates of 365.3% and 211.2% respectively, showing that Chinese new energy vehicles have successfully penetrated the heartland of traditional automotive powerhouse countries; additionally, Australia ranked fourth on the list and South Korea eighth, fully demonstrating the core competitiveness and diversified layout capabilities of Chinese new energy vehicles in both traditional automotive powerhouse countries and emerging markets.

TOP 10 Export Destination Countries for Chinese Passenger Cars (Jan-May 2026)

No. 1 Brazil, Jan-May 2026, exported 372,199 passenger cars to Brazil, cumulative year-on-year growth of 178.7%.

No. 2 Russia, Jan-May 2026, exported 350,641 passenger cars to Russia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 139.8%.

No. 3 United Kingdom, Jan-May 2026, exported 188,935 passenger cars to the UK, cumulative year-on-year growth of 82.0%.

No. 4 Australia, Jan-May 2026, exported 158,230 passenger cars to Australia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 59.2%.

No. 5 Belgium, Jan-May 2026, exported 156,364 passenger cars to Belgium, cumulative year-on-year growth of 26.6%.

No. 6 Italy, Jan-May 2026, exported 123,214 passenger cars to Italy, cumulative year-on-year growth of 140.7%.

No. 7 United Arab Emirates, Jan-May 2026, exported 119,179 passenger cars to UAE, cumulative year-on-year decline of 32.6%.

No. 8 Mexico, Jan-May 2026, exported 113,642 passenger cars to Mexico, cumulative year-on-year decline of 40.0%.

No. 9 Spain, Jan-May 2026, exported 94,452 passenger cars to Spain, cumulative year-on-year growth of 56.0%.

No. 10 Malaysia, Jan-May 2026, exported 78,599 passenger cars to Malaysia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 26.9%.

From Jan-May 2026, the landscape of Chinese passenger car export destinations continued to evolve. Brazil maintained the top spot with 372,199 units and a 178.7% year-on-year growth, further consolidating its status as the No. 1 export market. Russia ranked second with 350,641 units and a 139.8% year-on-year growth, showing strong demand for Chinese vehicles.

In terms of regional distribution, the European market showed overall growth. The United Kingdom firmly ranked third with 188,935 units and 82.0% year-on-year growth. Belgium (156,364 units), Italy (123,214 units), and Spain (94,452 units) all achieved year-on-year growth, with Italy's growth reaching as high as 140.7%, reflecting the continuous breakthroughs of Chinese brands in new energy product import and channel construction in Europe. If Russia is included in the European regional consideration, the proportion of the European market in Chinese passenger car exports exceeds half, becoming the absolute core. However, the European market still faces uncertainties in policy environment, trade barriers, and local competition; future growth leans more towards structural opportunities.

The Latin American market showed obvious polarization. Brazil ranked at the top with over 370,000 units and 178.7% year-on-year growth, benefiting from early volume increase before tariff hikes in July. In contrast, Mexican exports declined by 40.0% year-on-year, related to tariff increases effective from Jan 2026, compounded by tightening North American trade policies and adjustments in market expectations, leading to significant demand contraction. This differentiation indicates that the performance of Chinese car companies in the Latin American region is influenced by tariff, trade policy cycles, and local market environments of each country, making operating fluctuations caused by country differences very prominent.

The Middle East market entered an adjustment phase. UAE (119,179 units) declined by 32.6% year-on-year, leaving behind the previous high-speed growth. Regarding the Asia-Pacific market, Australia (158,230 units) grew by 59.2% year-on-year, ranking fourth; Malaysia (78,599 units) grew by 26.9% year-on-year, ranking tenth, showing that the potential of Southeast Asian and Oceania markets is continuously being released. Overall, Chinese passenger car exports are transitioning from relying on a few hotspot markets to a new stage where multiple regions bear pressure together and the structure is becoming increasingly diverse; growth drivers are shifting from quantity expansion to a deeper contest of product strength and brand recognition.

TOP 10 Export Destination Countries for Chinese "New Energy" Passenger Cars (Jan-May 2026)

No. 1 Brazil, Jan-May 2026, exported 283,182 new energy passenger cars to Brazil, cumulative year-on-year growth of 175.6%.

No. 2 Belgium, Jan-May 2026, exported 150,110 new energy passenger cars to Belgium, cumulative year-on-year growth of 25.8%.

No. 3 United Kingdom, Jan-May 2026, exported 129,807 new energy passenger cars to the UK, cumulative year-on-year growth of 81.4%.

No. 4 Australia, Jan-May 2026, exported 111,406 new energy passenger cars to Australia, cumulative year-on-year growth of 168.2%.

No. 5 Italy, Jan-May 2026, exported 67,043 new energy passenger cars to Italy, cumulative year-on-year growth of 365.3%.

No. 6 Germany, Jan-May 2026, exported 65,235 new energy passenger cars to Germany, cumulative year-on-year growth of 211.2%.

No. 7 Thailand, Jan-May 2026, exported 62,316 new energy passenger cars to Thailand, cumulative year-on-year growth of 62.8%.

No. 8 South Korea, Jan-May 2026, exported 60,488 new energy passenger cars to South Korea, cumulative year-on-year growth of 170.3%.

No. 9 Spain, Jan-May 2026, exported 56,953 new energy passenger cars to Spain, cumulative year-on-year growth of 74.9%.

No. 10 United Arab Emirates, Jan-May 2026, exported 53,135 new energy passenger cars to UAE, cumulative year-on-year growth of 45.7%.

From Jan-May 2026, the landscape of Chinese new energy passenger car export destinations changed significantly. Brazil maintained the top spot with 283,182 units and a 175.6% year-on-year growth, further expanding its lead, with new energy becoming the absolute main force for Chinese car exports to Brazil. Belgium leaped to second place with 150,110 units and 25.8% year-on-year growth, highlighting its strategic value as a European new energy transit hub. The United Kingdom ranked third with 129,807 units and 81.4% year-on-year growth, followed closely by Australia with 111,406 units and a 168.2% surge year-on-year, showing that electrification demand in the Oceania market is accelerating.

In terms of regional distribution, the European market showed an overall explosive trend. Including Belgium and the UK, Italy (67,043 units) grew by 365.3% year-on-year, Germany (65,235 units) grew by 211.2% year-on-year, and Spain (56,953 units) grew by 74.9% year-on-year, with growth rates far exceeding the average. Among them, the amazing increases in Italy and Germany show that Chinese new energy vehicles have successfully penetrated the heartland of traditional automotive powerhouse countries, with product strength and brand recognition achieving substantial breakthroughs. However, the European market still faces policy uncertainties such as carbon tariffs and anti-subsidy investigations; future growth relies more on deep integration into local supply chains.

The Asian market is blossoming in multiple points. Thailand (62,316 units) grew by 62.8% year-on-year. As a stronghold of Southeast Asian EV industry, Chinese brands continue to deepen their efforts through localized production layouts. South Korea (60,488 units) grew by 170.3% year-on-year, entering the top ten for the first time, reflecting significantly improved competitiveness of Chinese new energy vehicles in East Asian neighboring countries. Regarding the Middle East market, UAE (53,135 units) grew by 45.7% year-on-year, with new energy becoming a new growth point in this region.

Overall, Chinese new energy passenger car exports have entered a new stage, with market coverage extending from emerging economies to traditional automotive powerhouse countries. Growth dynamics have shifted from price advantages to a deeper contest of technical strength and brand premium. In the future, how to maintain sustainable growth under the intensification of trade barriers and requirements for local production will be a common challenge facing Chinese new energy vehicle companies.

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Ford Everest 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。

價錢同版本

Ford Everest 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 266,338 - 430,838，一共有 6 個版本，包括 2026 3.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 430,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Platinum（RM 348,838）、2026 2.0T 4WD Sport（RM 316,838） 等。

Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。

由價錢睇，Subaru Crosstrek 嘅入手價比 Ford Everest 平咗 RM 121,338。坦白講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

動力同油耗

Ford Everest 配備 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。

Subaru Crosstrek 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。

動力方面，Ford Everest 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 47 匹馬力，中段加速會更有信心，尤其係跑高速超車嘅時候。但 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅油耗表現可能仲好，日常市區通勤嘅話分別唔會太明顯。

安全配備

Ford Everest 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Co-Pilot360。

Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。

配備方面，兩款車都搵到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Ford Everest 嘅 Co-Pilot360 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比吓兩者嘅功能列表。

保養同維修

Ford Everest 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Subaru Crosstrek 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

兩款車嘅保養條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要看品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真正車主嘅經驗。

總結

總體嚟講，Ford Everest 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

車型概覽

Ferrari Monza SP2 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。

售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。

購車價格指南

Ferrari Monza SP2 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。

如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 6.5L Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。

核心規格重點

睇 Ferrari Monza SP2 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。

自然進氣、12 個 汽缸 嘅動力底子，重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 596 kW、719 N·m 嘅輸出，對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4657 mm、車闊 1996 mm、車高 1155 mm、軸距 2720 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 濕式雙離合(DCT)、前置後駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。

優缺點分析

Ferrari Monza SP2 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。

要留意嘅係，香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。

買家常見問題

買 Ferrari Monza SP2 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。

常見疑問係「Ferrari Monza SP2 全球限量生產幾多部？」簡單講，Ferrari Monza SP1 同 SP2 合共全球限量生產 499 部。由於兩款車嘅產量係共同計算，而且只會邀請品牌最核心嘅 VIP 客戶購買，令佢喺二手市場嘅升值潛力極高。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。

同級對比內容

將 Ferrari Monza SP2 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。

咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。

用車全周期指南

擁有 Ferrari Monza SP2 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。

如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.

BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest Highlight

In May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.

Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5

Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.

Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%

Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.

In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.

Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced Effort

Changan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.

In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.

Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%

Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.

Final Thoughts

From May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.