首頁親子
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 馬自達 CX-30 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嚟做比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
馬自達 CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 88,750 - 99,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH（RM 99,750）、2025 1.5T Standard（RM 88,750） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅起步價比 馬自達 CX-30 平咗 RM 33,659。講真，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
馬自達 CX-30 配搭 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 配搭 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
由動力嚟睇，馬自達 CX-30 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速超車嘅時候。不過 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 嘅油耗可能更節省，日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。
馬自達 CX-30 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 保養保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-30 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，馬自達 CX-30 同 奇瑞 Tiggo Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
At the critical juncture of new energy transformation, everyone is pulling out all the stops, but Changan Automobile pulled off the harshest move — changing leadership.
Recently, Changan Automobile Co., Ltd. (Changan Automobile) suddenly issued an announcement that Zhu Hairong resigned from the positions of Chairman, Director, and Legal Representative, no longer holds any position in the company and its controlled subsidiaries, and continues to serve as Party Secretary and Chairman of China Changan Automobile Group Co., Ltd. (China Changan).
At the same time, the board elected Zhao Fei as Chairman of Changan Automobile, appointed Ye Pei as President, Yang Dayong as Executive Senior Vice President, and Deng Chenghao as Executive Vice President.
The announcement stated that this adjustment aims to leverage China Changan Automobile's role as a specialized automotive industry group in "formulating strategy, allocating resources, promoting synergy, controlling risk, and strengthening incentives".
Zhu Hairong added in the media interview on that day, explaining the intention is to clarify the governance boundary between the group and the listed company, the President position will be generated internally from within the company, and will no longer be directly concurrently held by group leadership members.
Since this personnel adjustment involves Changan Automobile's top leader Zhu Hairong, especially just last month he just completed his re-election as Chairman, yet now resigns directly, sparking many speculations within the industry.
For the newly appointed Zhao Fei, being at the critical juncture of Changan's new energy transformation is enough to show the heavy responsibility entrusted by the group. Currently, Changan Automobile's fuel vehicle share continues to decline, new energy has not yet been able to shoulder the sales burden, and multi-brand operations face challenges, indicating that Zhao Fei's pressure is significant.
Changan Automobile's Ledger
First look at September. Changan Automobile sold 215,400 units, down 19.11% year-on-year. Among them, new energy 119,800 units, up 15.64% year-on-year, accounting for 55.6% of group sales; overseas 94,200 units, accounting for 43.72%.
Looking at the structure, this is a decent performance. New energy accounts for over half, overseas exceeds 40%, fuel vehicles are no longer the main force. According to CPCA data, domestic passenger car retail in September decreased by 28% year-on-year. Maintaining this structure under such a market context shows that the direction of transformation is not wrong.
The problem lies in the cumulative data. January-September, Changan Automobile cumulative sales 1.69 million units, down 18.07% year-on-year; new energy cumulative 709,300 units, down 2.07% year-on-year. The 15.64% growth in September for new energy is real, but one month's numbers cannot change the trend of the first three quarters. The subsidy panic buying in the same period last year raised the base, and the rhythm of new car launches this year was slower, squeezing both ends, and cumulative data went down.
Looking at brands, the situation of the three businesses differs greatly.
Qiyuan is the only one that stood out. September 46,500 units, August 45,900 units, consistently maintained above 45,000 units for two consecutive months, brand cumulative sales broke 1 million units in September. In the first half of the year, Qiyuan Q05 monthly sales were stable above 15,000 units, ranking first in compact pure electric SUVs for three consecutive months; in Q2, Qiyuan achieved quarterly profit for the first time, average vehicle price increased by 12,000 yuan year-on-year. In this year's price war, being able to increase volume, raise prices, and make profit, getting these three things done simultaneously is not easy.
Deepal's scale stood firm, but the speed slowed down. September 30,200 units, Jan-Sept 252,200 units, up 8.59% year-on-year, 1 millionth vehicle rolled off the line on September 28. Last year's full year growth was 36.6%, this year dropped to single digits. In the first half of the year, Deepal S05 ranked first in sales in the 120,000 to 180,000 yuan pure electric compact SUV sub-sector for four consecutive months, the product itself had no problem, the problem is that the capacity of this price band is limited, and Deepal is still losing money to this day.
The situation of Avatr is the worst. September 8,183 units, down 25.8% year-on-year, Jan-Sept about 51,500 units, only slightly higher than the monthly sales of 30,000 to 40,000 of top new luxury brands. Losses are narrowing, average vehicle price is increasing, HK Stock IPO is also proceeding. High-end brand with monthly sales under 10,000, hard to amortize R&D and channel fixed investment.
The three brands combined 84,900 units in September.
The profit situation explains the problem better than sales. In the first half of the year, Changan Automobile operating revenue 65.634 billion yuan, down 9.71% year-on-year; net profit attributable to parent shareholders 817 million yuan, down 64.32% year-on-year; deducting non-recurring gains/losses net profit attributable to parent shareholders 251 million yuan, down 83.01% year-on-year, of which Q2 deducting non-recurring net profit was only 80 million yuan. Net operating cash flow was negative 11.413 billion yuan, same period last year was negative 8.607 billion yuan.
Sales are growing, but profit and cash flow are deteriorating, indicating that the scale of new energy has not yet reached the level to cover investment. Penetration rate, product structure, partial profitability indicators have been achieved, but overall economic feasibility has not yet been proven.
Overseas data can serve as a reference. In the first half of the year, Changan overseas gross margin 20.13%, domestic only 11.67%; overseas revenue 21.942 billion yuan, up 78.77% year-on-year, accounting ratio of total revenue rose from 16.89% to 33.43%. Current profits, largely overseas gross margin compensating for domestic thin profits. September overseas ratio surged to 43.72% is also due to this reason. But overseas is simultaneously in investment phase, Thailand's Rayong factory, Brazil's Anapolis factory are both ramping up, channels, stockpiling, local teams all need to spend money first, in short term still revenue growth without profit growth.
Industry Coordinates: Leading Second Tier
Comparing Changan among major automotive groups, the position is relatively clear.
Data in the table comes from various company announcements or production and sales quick reports, statistical scope is not consistent, for reference only.
Among these 8 companies, Changan and BYD are the only two with negative numbers, but reasons differ. BYD is actively adjusting structure on a 3.13 million unit scale, shifting increments to overseas, September overseas sales 180,700 units, close to 40% of total sales. Changan is on a 700,000 unit scale, simultaneously held back by product iterations and fuel vehicle clearance.
Paths of several rivals are also worth comparing.
BYD goes all-in on new energy, vertical integration pushed costs to positions others cannot follow, now relies on overseas for increments. 3.13 million unit scale is more than four times Changan's, this path Changan cannot learn yet.
Geely September new energy 190,900 units, penetration rate 65%, also spread across multiple brands, difference is each brand reached top tier in its own price band.
Chery relies on exports for pull. New energy 858,500 units, up 46.1% year-on-year, September exports 207,800 units, set a record. In its new energy increments, a significant portion comes from overseas.
Changan goes with multi-brand plus overseas, form most close to Geely, gap also falls on scale. Qiyuan 46,500 units placed in 80,000 to 250,000 yuan mainstream market not weak, but opposite is Geely Galaxy's 130,500 units and BYD Dynasty plus Ocean's 394,900 units; Deepal 30,200 units stood in 150,000 to 200,000 yuan new energy SUVs, but this pool itself is not big; Avatr 8,183 units in over 300,000 yuan, opposite is monthly sales 37,200 units, doubled year-on-year Zeekr, and AITO and NIO. Three brands combined, only equals two-thirds of one Geely Galaxy.
Problems faced by multi-brands in 2026 are common to the whole industry. Market has shifted from increment expansion to stock replacement, new energy retail penetration rate 67%, independent brand new energy domestic retail penetration rate 84.5%, mainstream joint venture only 15.9%. Share that can be divided is basically divided, remaining is joint venture fuel vehicle final base. Multi-brand originally was to cover blank price bands, now became cutting more slices in the same market, the thinner the cut, the harder to amortize R&D, platform and channel costs for each brand.
Adjustments in these two years all show this direction. Changan combined Avatr and Deepal styling, product development, platform technology, HR and finance into the newly established AD collaborative development department; GAC merged Hyper and Aion into the same business department at the end of 2025. Methods are same, all reduce brand count, increase scale of single brand.
This leadership change is also a continuation of this train of thought. Zhao Fei concurrently serves as listed company Chairman with group General Manager identity, Ye Pei promoted from Executive Senior Vice President to President, Deepal Chairman Deng Chenghao entered listed company Executive Vice President sequence. Purpose of this arrangement is to shorten decision chain between group and listed company, bring Avatr and Deepal synergy from documents to departments. It solves more efficiency problems.
So, let's see where the new core leadership team led by Zhao Fei can lead Changan Automobile.
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car.
The OTR price of Toyota Yaris Cross in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Yaris Cross is indeed RM 29,850 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV.
If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs.
However, note that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Toyota Yaris Cross comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp.
Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV comes with Hybrid, 170 hp.
Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 more horsepower than Toyota Yaris Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl.
However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and neither will feel underpowered.
Toyota Yaris Cross has a safety rating of 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including TSS.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV has a safety rating of TBD, with active safety systems including Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings.
However, there are some differences in functionality between Toyota Yaris Cross's TSS and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Toyota Yaris Cross uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both FWD, so the daily driving experience won't be much different.
Both Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting.
If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration.
Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are very good models in the Malaysian market.
Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget.
We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision.
Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time on research will definitely not be wrong.
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 159,750 - 159,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 130,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 145,000), etc.
From a price perspective, Toyota Yaris Cross's starting price is indeed RM 59,850 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 8 Pro. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 8 Pro's 2.0L 4-cyl has 65 more horsepower than Toyota Yaris Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel lack of power.
Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars of this level are completely sufficient for daily use.
Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with more configurations. Finally, it is recommended to test drive both, experiencing it personally is the most important.
Overall, Toyota Yaris Cross and Chery Tiggo 8 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose, the key is still your personal needs and budget. We recommend everyone do their homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing homework will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會將 Honda CR-V 同 BMW X1 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅對比，幫你省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200）等。
BMW X1 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 252,800 - 252,800，一共有 2 個版本，包括 sDrive18i（RM 220,000）、sDrive20i（RM 250,000）等。
從價錢睇，Honda CR-V 嘅起步價確實比 BMW X1 平咗 RM 74,600。如果你預算有限，Honda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平啲嘅幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Honda CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
BMW X1 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Honda CR-V 嘅 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM) 同 BMW X1 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm，行李廂 450 L。
BMW X1 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
空間方面，Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 BMW X1 長咗 100 mm，車內乘坐空間會稍為寬鬆啲，尤其係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車，大少少嘅車身確實更實用。
Honda CR-V 保養 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
BMW X1 保養 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Honda CR-V 同 BMW X1 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊款車，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will conduct a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Honda CR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, totaling 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
The Subaru Forester OTR price in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, totaling 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
From a pricing perspective, the Subaru Forester's starting price is RM 4,200 cheaper than the Honda CR-V. Honestly, in this price segment, a difference of a few thousand is not actually that significant; the key lies in overall value and long-term running costs.
The Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
The Subaru Forester is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, so the daily driving feel is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
The Honda CR-V adopts a FWD drive system.
The Subaru Forester adopts a FWD drive system.
Both cars have the same drive system, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in daily driving feel.
The Honda CR-V warranty is 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
The Subaru Forester warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-effectiveness and features, then choose the model with richer configurations. In the end, it is suggested to test drive both; experiencing it firsthand is the most important.
Overall, Honda CR-V and Subaru Forester are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is suggested to do your homework, compare quotes from a few car dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
