首頁篮球
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800. There are 4 versions in total, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Mazda CX-60's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873. There are 2 versions in total, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 93,710 cheaper than Mazda CX-60. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But please note, for the few thousand difference, there may be trade-offs in equipment, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X90 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-60 is equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-60's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more hp than Proton X90's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mazda CX-60 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, Mazda CX-60's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, offering an advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X90 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has trade-offs.
Proton X90 adopts FWD drive mode.
Mazda CX-60 adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, there won't be much difference in daily driving experience.
Both Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, choose the model with richer features. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X90 and Mazda CX-60 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will absolutely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 18,050 cheaper than Proton X70. To be honest, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key is to look at the overall value for money and long-term usage cost.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than Chery Tiggo Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl, with more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Chery Tiggo Cross's fuel consumption might be more friendly, and the difference in daily city commuting won't be too large.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For this level of car, it is completely sufficient for daily use.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo Cross adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of the two cars are the same, both FWD, so the driving experience won't be too different in daily use.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and specifications, choose the one with richer features. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time doing research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-60 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等。
Mazda CX-60 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 200,510 - 252,873，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus（RM 252,873）、2025 2.5L 2WD High（RM 200,510）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-60 平咗 RM 93,710。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都唔可以忘記，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，視乎你嘅需求而定。
Proton X70 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Mazda CX-60 配備 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠勁。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mazda CX-60 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense Pro。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Mazda CX-60 嘅 i-Activsense Pro 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
Mazda CX-60 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Mazda CX-60 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有優缺。
Proton X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-60 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Mazda CX-60 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會揀 Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300）等等。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，一總共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800）等等。
從價錢來看，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Toyota Corolla Cross 平咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都需注意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Toyota Corolla Cross 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用嘅係同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感受基本上無乜分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Toyota Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸差唔多，車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終仲係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Toyota Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. Both models are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Mitsubishi Xforce's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X50 is indeed RM 20,130 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mitsubishi Xforce's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include MI-PILOT.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New cars nowadays have good safety, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 uses a 4WD drive system.
Mitsubishi Xforce uses a FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Mitsubishi's FWD will feel different in handling, a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mitsubishi Xforce warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X50 and Mitsubishi Xforce are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on homework will never be wrong.
【懂車之道 產業】我哋嚟盤點下 2026 年 7 月 23 日，汽車圈發生咗咩大事件。
汽車事件一：浩思動力 V6 引擎樣機成功點火
近日，浩思動力 HORSE W30 首台樣機成功點火，該機型有望配套蓮花跑車產品線，進一步完善咗佢由家用高效動力至高端性能動力嘅全譜系產品矩陣。
作為面向高性能混動市場打造嘅核心產品，HORSE W30 兼顧極致性能、多場景適配同平台化拓展能力，可以滿足賽道場景下嘅持續動力輸出需求，亦能憑藉靈活嘅混動架構適配複雜地形、日常通勤等多元場景，為高性能混動車型提供咗全新嘅技術選擇。
汽車事件二：特斯拉發布第二季度財報
7 月 23 日，特斯拉發布 2026 年第二季度財報。本季度特斯拉全球共生產純電動車超 45.1 萬輛，同比增長約 10%；交付量超 48 萬輛，同比增長約 25%。上海超級工廠 6 月交付電動車超 8.9 萬輛，同比增長 24.4%，創本年內新高；上半年共交付近 46.8 萬輛，同比增長 28.4%。特斯拉第二季度總營收同比增長 26%，達到 282 億美元。
截至第二季度，特斯拉輔助駕駛全球付費用戶已達 148 萬，北美市場輔助駕駛選裝率創歷史新高，超過一半新車喺交付嗰陣訂閱咗輔助駕駛。
汽車事件三：馬來西亞首台 iCAR V23 正式下線
7 月 22 日，ICAR 汽車官方宣布，馬來西亞首台 iCAR V23 正式下線，新車將會喺 7 月底到店。據此前報道，2025 年 11 月，奇瑞汽車集團旗下嘅子品牌 iCaur 正式向馬來西亞推出 iCaur V23（國內為 iCAR V23），共推出 2 款車型，售價 11.98-13.28 萬林吉特（約合人民幣 20.53-22.76 萬元）。
《每日車聞》，呢度有最新嘅當日汽車新聞，請繼續關注《懂車之道》
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time on research.
The Proton X50 has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), and more.
The Chery Tiggo Cross has an OTR price in Malaysia of RM 88,750 - 99,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 2025 HEV 1.5L CSH (RM 99,750), 2025 1.5T Standard (RM 88,750), and more.
From a pricing perspective, the starting price of the Chery Tiggo Cross is RM 1,050 cheaper than the Proton X50. Honestly, in this price range, a gap of a few thousand isn't actually very big; the key is to look at overall cost-effectiveness and long-term usage costs.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Chery Tiggo Cross is TBD, and active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between the Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo Cross's Basic. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.
The Proton X50 uses 4WD drive system.
The Chery Tiggo Cross uses FWD drive system.
Proton's 4WD and Chery's FWD will feel different in handling; a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo Cross warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-effectiveness and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both; personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo Cross are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買客揀車嗰陣都會拿奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀做比較。呢兩款車喺價錢同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一个詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo 標準版（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo 豪華版（RM 145,000） 等。
福斯途觀喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 206,540 - 260,024，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 Allspace 2.0T R-Line（RM 260,024）、2025 Allspace 1.4T 優雅版（RM 206,540） 等。
由價錢睇，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅入門價真係比福斯途觀平咗 RM 46,790。如果你預算有限，奇瑞嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需要。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅安全评分係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
福斯途觀嘅安全评分係 5 星 (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 IQ.Drive。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到咗幾唔錯嘅評分。不過奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Basic 同福斯途觀嘅 IQ.Drive 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以詳細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
福斯途觀採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
福斯途觀保用 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保用條件一樣，呢方面唔使諗。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問下真實車主嘅經驗。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終係建議兩款都去試駕，親身嘗試先係最重要。
總括嚟講，奇瑞 Tiggo 8 PHEV 同福斯途觀都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建议大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
Ferrari Luce 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講同級車比較，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「法拉利首部純電超跑Luce正式登場 蘋果前設計師操刀、真引擎聲、2.5秒破百」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
Ferrari Luce 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 530km Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 Ferrari Luce 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
Ferrari Luce 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
Ferrari Luce 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 Ferrari Luce 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Ferrari Luce 係法拉利第一部電動車嗎？」簡單講，係嘅，Ferrari Luce 係法拉利品牌旗下第一部量產嘅純電動車。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 Ferrari Luce 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 Ferrari Luce 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.
BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.
The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.
From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.
Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.
The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.
近日，吉利 5 月海外銷量公佈，海外出口銷量超 8.5 萬輛再創新高，同比增長 184%。
此前 4 月，吉利海外新能源銷量同比增長 624.5%，蟬聯中國新能源車出海增速第一。
細分市場上，吉利銷量表現依然多點開花。其中，吉利進入澳大利亞市場僅 14 個月，交付量突破 1 萬台，成為當地增長最快的中國車企之一；同時在巴西市場，銷量攀升至 4000+ 輛，刷新在該國市場的最高單月銷量。墨西哥市場 1-4 月累計銷量 1.6 萬 +，創歷史新高。
Geely EX2 在墨西哥、印尼、哥斯達黎加等多個市場獲得 B 級兩廂新能源銷量 TOP1；Geely EX5 在澳大利亞、阿聯酋、烏拉圭等多個國家一季度純電 SUV-C 市場銷冠。極氪在 7X、009 成為細分市場銷冠，其中極氪 7X 在澳大利亞市場銷量再次登頂，超越長期霸榜的特斯拉 Model Y。
面對爆單壓力，吉利依托寧波出海樞紐，同時啟用滾裝船、集裝箱船與國際鐵路班列開展海陸聯運，全力保障整車交付。吉利汽車集團物流中心國際業務負責人接受採訪時稱，目前已緊急新增多條運輸路線，形成 4 大鐵路港、6 大海運港的運力資源佈局，配有兩艘自有滾裝船，同時新開多條跨境運輸專線，持續補充各類運力資源，每月可穩定發運近萬台新車到歐洲核心港口。中歐班列吉利專列常態化開展，運輸時間相比海運可縮短 40 天。未來，為應對海外銷量爆發式增長，吉利將持續擴充海外運輸規模，進一步提升車輛交付時間。
吉利海外銷量的暴漲，直觀的展現了吉利強大的產品力以及本土化佈局落地，更體現了中國汽車在高端化出海科技出海領域的強大實力。
