首頁摄影
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, total 4 variants, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800) etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, total 4 variants, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639) etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 22,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware, those few thousand cheaper, might have trade-offs in features, depends on your needs.
Proton X90 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Kia Sportage safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Drive Wise.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars nowadays are generally safe, no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Both cars' dimensions are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. Cars in this class are fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Kia Sportage warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, Proton X90 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending time on research will definitely not be a mistake.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X90 同 本田 CR-V 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X90 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,800，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 1.5T Prime X（RM 122,800）、2026 1.5T Prime（RM 116,800）、2026 1.5T Lite（RM 106,800） 等。
本田 CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900，合共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS（RM 195,900）、2026 1.5T 4WD V（RM 181,900）、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E（RM 178,200） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，寶騰 X90 嘅入門價確實比 本田 CR-V 平咗 RM 71,400。如果你預算唔夠，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，平緊嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上要取舍，具體睇你嘅需求。
寶騰 X90 裝 1.5L Turbo 引擎，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
本田 CR-V 裝 2.0L 4-cyl 引擎，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，本田 CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X90 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X90 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
本田 CR-V 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING (ACC, CMBS, LKAS, RDM)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心這一點。
寶騰 X90 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
本田 CR-V 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X90 同 本田 CR-V 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一架，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In 1958, China's total car production was under 20,000 units.
That year, workers at the Shanghai Automobile Assembly Plant hammered out the first Phoenix brand sedan. The body was shaped by hand hammering, and the curves of the fenders and roof were hammered out one strike at a time. No one knew that 71 years later, this factory in the alleyway would deliver its 100 millionth vehicle into users' hands.
100 million units. This figure, globally, is a threshold only a few giants like Toyota, Volkswagen, and GM have crossed.
From 20,000 to 100 million, the Chinese automotive industry took 71 years. SAIC is the one that has walked the furthest and most steadily on this path. But it has not stopped—just two months after 100 million units, it delivered a performance report of 2.384 million units from January to July, continuing to lead the Chinese car market.
From the historical weight of "100 million units" to the realistic speed of "2.384 million units"—SAIC, with a set of figures, wrote the opening of its second half. Crossing mountains and seas, a new chapter unfolds.
100 Million Units, A Coming of Age Ceremony for an Industry
In 1983, the first Santana rolled off the line in Shanghai. The local production rate was 2.7%, and only five items could be matched: tires, radios, horns, antennas, signs—countable on one hand. In the following decade, SAIC chewed through domestic parts enterprises piece by piece, and the local production rate finally broke 80%. That was the first time China possessed a truly modern automotive parts system.
Thereafter, in 1997, SAIC GM built a factory and produced cars in 23 months, and "Chinese Speed" was written into the global automotive industrial coordinate system; in 2006, the Roewe brand was born, and domestic brands had their own names for the first time; in 2016, the world's first internet-connected car, Roewe RX5, debuted, and cars had the ability to "think" for the first time.
Over the 70 years, every leap by SAIC was synchronized with the leap of the Chinese automotive industry—from "Can we build a car" to "Can we build a good car" to "Can we define a car". The walk wasn't fast, but every step counted. Sailed past 70 years of waves and sand, the bow has turned to the next sea area.
2.384 Million Units: Growth Amidst Adverse Trends
The Chinese car market in 2026, when the vast majority of automakers faced challenges of scaling down, SAIC's answer was 2.384 million units sold from January to July, steadily leading.
Behind the numbers lies a structural change. Domestic brands accounted for 72.4%, and for every three cars sold, more than two came from the domestic camp. The proposition of "market for technology" has a new answer—technology was not just traded for, but grew its own roots. SAIC Passenger Cars, IM, Maxus, Wuling, five domestic sectors took root and grew in their respective sub-segments, forming a complete defense line from low to high.
New energy is rewriting the power structure of this enterprise. Sales of 973,000 units from January to July, a growth rate of 27.4%, far exceeding industry average. Behind this figure is the sustained heat of MG4 family delivering over 17,000 units monthly, it is the market rhythm of Shangjie Z7/Z7T delivering over 20,000 units in just over two months, and it is the explosive power of MG07 pre-sale orders breaking 21,000 in 20 hours. Joint ventures were also making efforts—Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X joined the first tier of extended-range large SUVs, and Audi E7X delivered over 7,000 units in two months of launch.
From A0 class to mid-to-large SUVs, from daily commuting to luxury, SAIC's new energy map is covering every corner. New energy is no longer a trend, but daily life. In July, Wuling Starlight L, IM LS9 Hyper, MG07 landed successively, and the rhythm did not break.
Overseas: From Product to Home Court
Overseas cumulative sales of 876,000 units from January to July, year-on-year growth of 52.1%. Against the backdrop of the EU imposing additional tariffs, SAIC's choice was to plant roots deep—Frankfurt European Engineering Center focused on local R&D, Thailand, Indonesia, India three major bases support regional supply, 42 Ro-Ro ships guarantee global capacity.
In July, MG held the technical conference in London. Plug-in Hybrid+ Hybrid System, SolidCore Semi-Solid State Battery, MG Parking Smart Cockpit—three core technologies made a centralized appearance, systematically built three global technology tags: "Hybrid+ Hybrid", "SolidCore Solid/Semi-Solid Battery", "i-SMART Smart Driving". Same month, MG landed at the Goodwood Festival of Speed, MG Go! and Cyber Concept two concept cars had their global premiere.
From the technical conference to Goodwood, the signal released by MG was more important than new car launches: after sales expansion, the brand entered the next stage—from "Product Going Global" upgraded to "Technology Home Court". In Europe, MG brand cumulative sales of 218,000 units from January to July, consecutive champion for Chinese brands in Europe. As of July, overseas cumulative sales broke 7 million units. This road to going global has taken many years, every step is turning "Made in China" into "Known as China".
Domestic, New Energy, and Overseas three horse carriages working simultaneously—SAIC's growth engine switched from joint venture "single-core" to "multi-core" drive. Ranked 125th on the Fortune Global 500, up 13 positions from last year.
Joint Ventures are Being Redefined
Over 40 years of Chinese automotive joint ventures, the fixed script has never changed: foreign party provides technology, Chinese party provides market. SAIC is rewriting this script.
SAIC Volkswagen ID. ERA 9X, product definition led by the Chinese team, equipped with SAIC self-developed extended-range system and Yunqi Smart Cockpit—this is not "Importing German cars", it is "Defining German cars". Throughout 2026, SAIC Volkswagen plans to launch 7 new energy products, covering extended-range, plug-in hybrid, pure electric three technology routes.
Audi went further. April this year, Audi and SAIC signed a strategic cooperation agreement, plan to establish Audi Innovation Technology Center in Shanghai—Audi's first "full value chain" R&D entity outside Europe, start from vehicle platform to completely independent R&D. Audi abandoned the "Global Car" strategy, turned to "In the Local Market, For the Local Market".
SAIC GM is also transforming. March this year published three-year strategic plan, next three years launch more than a dozen new cars each year. January-July SAIC GM new energy vehicle sales 62,000 units, year-on-year growth of 75.2%.
Starting from Santana's localization rate of 2.7%, to now SAIC outputting core technology to joint venture brands—this path from learning to chasing to leading took a generation's time. The connotation of the word "Joint Venture" is being redefined. A new situation begins precisely when old boundaries are broken.
Technology: Not Suspended High Up
In the past decade, SAIC accumulated investment of nearly 190 billion yuan in electrification and intelligence, possessing over 24,000 valid patents. But the true meaning of these numbers lies in them moving from the lab to ordinary people's garages.
Roewe i6 at the 60k price level comes standard with 8155 chip and Doubao Smart Cockpit, MG4X at the 90k price level was the first to bring semi-solid state battery and rear-drive five-link independent suspension to this price range, SUVs under 300k come standard with steer-by-wire and rear-wheel steering—a 5-meter long car turns more flexibly than an A0 class small car. In July, IM LS9 Hyper was the first to land the steer-by-wire national standard, MG07 brings 800V+5C fast charging to the 120k price level market.
Industry common play is to divide users by configuration—want good experience, must spend more money. SAIC is doing another thing: turn cutting-edge technology into standard equipment for users at different price levels.
Use scale to dilute R&D costs, use cost advantage to widen user coverage, use order scale to feed back next-generation technology. Once a positive cycle is established, technology is no longer numbers on a spec sheet, but daily life that every ordinary car owner can feel every day.
Conclusion:
From 1958's Phoenix brand to 2026's 100 million units; from the hammer in the alley to Frankfurt's Technology Center, London's Technical Conference, Goodwood's Festival of Speed. This road took 71 years, not fast, but every step changed the boundaries of the Chinese automotive industry.
100 million units is not the end. Standing on this step, the question SAIC needs to answer is no longer "Can we build a car", but "How to define mobility in the next era". Mountains and seas have been crossed, a new situation has opened, the next journey is right beneath your feet.
Every step on this road concerns the daily mobility of countless people. 100 million units is not for looking back, it is for starting out.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買車人在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 來做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，總共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
MG MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 MG MG HS 平咗 RM 23,650。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
MG MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 MG MG HS 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
MG MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 MG MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較間幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係一件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對無錯。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300) etc.
The Chery Tiggo 7 Pro OTR price in Malaysia is RM 123,750 - 123,750, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.6L Turbo Standard (RM 125,000), 1.6L Turbo Premium (RM 140,000) etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 16,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 Pro. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But you should also note that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X70 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience in daily life is basically no different. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this point.
Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro's Basic have some functional differences. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists carefully.
Proton X70 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. For cars at this level, daily use is fully sufficient.
Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with a better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, then choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately it is suggested to test drive both models, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X70 and Chery Tiggo 7 Pro are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several car dealers, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning, today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The Subaru Crosstrek OTR price in Malaysia is RM 145,000 - 160,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2.0L e-Boxer (RM 150,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the Proton X50 starting price is indeed RM 55,200 cheaper than the Subaru Crosstrek. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand difference may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The Proton X50 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Subaru Crosstrek body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, daily use is fully sufficient.
The Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive system.
The Subaru Crosstrek adopts FWD drive system.
The Proton 4WD and Subaru FWD will have different handling feelings, test drives are recommended for comparison.
Both the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Subaru Crosstrek are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will definitely not go wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Proton X50 in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, with a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
The OTR price of the Subaru Forester in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Proton X50 is indeed RM 84,200 cheaper than the Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, the Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the difference of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
The safety rating of the Proton X50 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of the Subaru Forester is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety system includes EyeSight.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received good ratings. However, the ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) of the Proton X50 and the EyeSight of the Subaru Forester differ in functionality. If you value active safety, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
The Proton X50 body length is 4,400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Subaru Forester body length is 4,400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars at this level, daily use is more than enough.
The Proton X50 warranty is 5 years/150,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
The Subaru Forester warranty is 3 years/100,000 km, maintenance interval every 10,000 km or 6 months.
Overall, both the Proton X50 and Subaru Forester are excellent models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making your final decision. Buying a car is a major undertaking, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Proton X70 同 Honda HR-V 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Honda HR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 115,900 - 143,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2026 e:HEV 1.5L RS（RM 143,900）、2026 1.5T V（RM 137,900）、2026 1.5T E（RM 130,900） 等。
由價錢嚟睇，Proton X70 嘅起價確實比 Honda HR-V 平咗 RM 9,100。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
Proton X70 裝備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Honda HR-V 裝備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開落嚟嘅感覺基本上無分別。油耗方面都差不多，唔使太糾結這一點。
Proton X70 車身長 4400 mm，車尾箱 400 L。
Honda HR-V 車身長 4500 mm，車尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，Honda HR-V 嘅車身比 Proton X70 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過 Proton X70 喺城市入面泊車會靈活啲，各有取捨。
Proton X70 保用 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda HR-V 保用 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Proton X70 同 Honda HR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
In the Malaysia SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Kia Sportage when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing your homework.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Kia Sportage OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,639 - 179,320, there are 4 versions in total, including 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High (RM 179,320), 2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High (RM 159,320), 2025 2.0L AT 2WD High (RM 139,639), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,839 cheaper than Kia Sportage. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, specifically depends on your needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Kia Sportage is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, horsepower 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Kia Sportage's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have enough power, you won't feel a lack of power.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Kia Sportage body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 adopts 4WD drive method.
Kia Sportage adopts FWD drive method.
Proton's 4WD and Kia's FWD will have different driving feel, test drive comparison is recommended.
In summary, Proton X50 and Kia Sportage are both very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend everyone do their research, compare quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will absolutely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 做比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個角度做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
Kia Sportage 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,639 - 179,320，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 1.6T DCT 4WD High（RM 179,320）、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD High（RM 159,320）、2025 2.0L AT 2WD High（RM 139,639）等等。
從價錢睇來，Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Kia Sportage 平咗 RM 39,839。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以满足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上或者會有所取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Kia Sportage 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Drive Wise。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Proton X50 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
Kia Sportage 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾近一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全足夠。
Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最後都建議兩款都去試駕，親身經歷先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Kia Sportage 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事，花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
On July 16, the GAC Group 30 Million User Gratitude Event was held at the GAC Trumpchi factory. Leaders from Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, and Panyu District, Fu Bingfeng, Executive Vice President and Secretary-General of China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, Feng Xingya, Chairman of GAC Group, He Xianqing, General Manager, and other members of the leadership team, industry partners, suppliers, dealer representatives, and domestic and international owner representatives, staff representatives, and media representatives all attended together, witnessing the milestone moment of GAC welcoming its 30 millionth user.
From the first whole vehicle off the line to the delivery of the 30 millionth vehicle, GAC has experienced a 29-year development journey. Behind the number 30 million is the choice and trust of tens of millions of users, GAC's long-term determination to uphold quality and safety, the determination to transform towards electrification and intelligence, and a microcosm of the Chinese automotive industry growing from large to strong, from scale expansion to value leap.
Global Synchronization: Smart New Energy Matrix Demonstrates Transformation Process
At the event site, GAC's global multi-base production bases were connected simultaneously. GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota Platinum 7, Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, and GAC Hyper S600 were off the line sequentially as GAC's 29,999,995th to 29,999,999th vehicles. Finally, the right-hand drive version of GAC Trumpchi M8 PHEV made a brilliant appearance on the on-site stage as the 30 millionth whole vehicle. The collective appearance of the new energy vehicle off-line model matrix became direct evidence of GAC advancing its electrification and intelligence transformation with full speed.
Subsequently, Feng Xingya handed the key to the 30 millionth vehicle into the hands of Thai owner Mr. Tony Jaa. This moment captured is not just a number, but a warm witness of GAC and global users "running towards each other".
This trust spanning mountains and seas is exactly the confidence for GAC to break through in the industry upheaval. In the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, an increase of 2.35% year-on-year, among which new energy vehicle sales increased by 68.8% year-on-year; overseas exports broke through 120,000 vehicles, a surge of 132% year-on-year, running a steady rhythm during the industry's deep reshaping period.
Quality as Foundation: Building Confidence for Millions of Users' Travel
"Quality is the bottom line GAC will never concede." Feng Xingya stated in his summary speech. In GAC's development, scale growth has always maintained quality as the background. For many years, GAC Group has always adhered to the concept of "Quality First", integrating Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota's Lean Production Method (TPS), and Lingnan culture to build a quality management model centered on "Integration and Innovation". The focal point of everything is to create good cars that make users feel confident driving, worry-free using, and comfortable sitting.
From the R&D end to the manufacturing end, GAC has established a strict quality control system along the entire chain: before each new car goes on the market, it must undergo extreme environment testing in high cold, high temperature, high altitude, high humidity, high corrosion, mountain areas, and sand dust, completing "Two Winters, One Summer" on-site road tests; assisted by test grounds and laboratories covering 12 major items and over 1,500 verification sub-items for the whole vehicle, achieving systematic quality verification; GAC Aion Intelligent Eco Factory, as the "Global First New Energy Vehicle Lighthouse Factory", ensures stable quality of mass-produced products with a digital intelligent manufacturing system.
At the core safety technology level, the Xingling Safety Guardian System builds four protection dimensions, with eight key systems adopting dual redundancy design, having already guarded nearly 2 million users and avoiding 6.28 million potential travel risks; the Box Battery has accumulated 1.5 million vehicles on board, with safe driving mileage exceeding 160 billion kilometers; the service side simultaneously adds guarantees, GAC was the first in the industry to launch the independent brand "Three Responsibilities" policy, proactively covering the bottom line for user concerns on battery and intelligent driving assistance, dispelling user concerns about vehicle use. It is precisely these security lines and service commitments that support the brand confidence behind GAC's 30 million sales.
User Orientation: Building a Full-Cycle Warm Service System
"What users care about, we put in our hearts; what users expect, we go all out." Feng Xingya stated that this user-centric concept has long been deeply integrated into the development genes of GAC Group. For many years, GAC Group has always adhered to the corporate concept of "People First, Trust as Way, Innovation First", where the core meaning of "People First" is precisely taking users as the foundation.
On one hand, to face problems and listen to user voices, GAC regularly holds user full open-mic events, inviting users to the "home" for face-to-face exchange. Meanwhile, establishing a full-process closed-loop management mechanism ensures that every suggestion can be properly handled, and common issues are optimized for the full volume of users immediately.
In addition, GAC also established a dedicated user insight department and promoted the full-process change from problem discovery to solution, guaranteeing user requests are answered item by item and matters are settled item by item from an organizational mechanism perspective.
On the other hand, the service network accelerates penetration simultaneously. At the channel end, promoting service network sinking into counties, with plans to add 1,000 county-level authorized stores within the year; at the response end, launching "Super Butler" service, achieving 5-second response, 2-hour request completion, guaranteeing user requests are reached and processed fast. At the replenishment end, building a "9 Vertical 10 Horizontal" replenishment network, already covering 31 provinces and 213 cities nationwide, with "a station within 1 kilometer in straight line" in core urban areas, with self-operated charging piles exceeding 27,000 roots, among which super-fast charging piles broke through 20,000 roots, providing convenient replenishment services for new energy vehicle owners.
The core theme of this gratitude event is to pay sincere feedback and thanks for the long-term support of 30 million users. At the event site, Feng Xingya announced that starting from today, GAC officially launches the "GAC Group 30 Million Vehicle Exit · Renew Gratitude Season". GAC Honda, GAC Toyota, GAC Trumpchi, GAC Aion, GAC Hyper, and Qijing Automotive, the six passenger car brands, will introduce characteristic policies around new purchase, exchange to additional purchase respectively, to feedback every companionship and support.
Tech Centripetal: Empowering Real Travel with Cutting-edge Technology
With 30 million as a new starting point, GAC will drive innovation to move towards a new journey of electrification and intelligence, letting cutting-edge technology truly transform into user-perceivable peace of mind and convenience.
In the power field, Xingyuan Power developed by the "National Excellent Engineer Team", covering Xingyuan Extended Range, Xingyuan Plug-in Hybrid, and Xingyuan Super Twin-engine three technologies, will be equipped with more mass-produced vehicle models. Each product must undergo 100,000 hours of bench and whole vehicle verification, equivalent mileage exceeding 10 million kilometers, ensuring performance remains steady as a rock under all scenarios and regions.
In the "Three Power" field, GAC continues to tackle battery super-fast charging, low-temperature range, and other industry pain points, having built a full solid-state battery pilot production line, launching extreme energy consumption technology, with the mass-produced Quark E-drive motor highest efficiency breaking through 99%, the highest level in the industry.
In the intelligent networking field, the Super Brain Xingling Architecture continues to evolve, connecting intelligent driving assistance, smart cockpit, power, chassis, body, and internet of vehicles six systems, achieving "One Brain Unified Command", with comprehensive performance improved by 40%; Star River Smart Cockpit achieves end-cloud integration, letting cars become true "thinking, understanding people" partners. GAC will also stand shoulder to shoulder with top partners such as Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, and Alibaba to build a stronger AI smart eco.
So far, GAC Group cumulative R&D investment exceeded 62 billion yuan, global R&D team exceeds 6,800 people. Continuous technical investment is pushing GAC's products from transportation tools to intelligent travel partners, mobile smart spaces, and green energy ecosystems.
Looking to the future, GAC will continue to anchor user needs, build on quality, take technological innovation as core drive, take global layout as development path, accelerating the upgrade to Eco-tech GAC, walking side by side and achieving each other with more users, jointly rushing to a smarter, greener, and broader future.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嚟做比較。兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
由價錢睇，Perodua Aruz 嘅起跳價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 平咗 RM 50,850。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要注意，便宜嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
Perodua Aruz 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，嗰就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the SUV market in Malaysia, many buyers compare the Perodua Aruz and the Mazda CX-30 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of the Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of the Mazda CX-30 in Malaysia is RM 122,409 - 146,409, with a total of 4 versions, including 2025 2.0L High+ Premium (RM 146,409), 2025 2.0L High+ (RM 138,409), 2025 2.0L High (RM 130,409), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of the Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 49,509 cheaper than the Mazda CX-30. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Perodua is sufficient for daily needs. But you should also note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-30 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mazda CX-30's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Perodua Aruz's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, and you won't feel it lacks power.
The safety rating of the Perodua Aruz is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The safety rating of the Mazda CX-30 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Both cars have the same safety rating, and safety features are quite complete in this class. The safety of new cars these days is not bad, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mazda CX-30 warranty 5 years/150,000km, service interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this aspect. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.
Both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-30 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about price-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both the Perodua Aruz and Mazda CX-30 are excellent car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you the time of doing research.
The OTR price of Perodua Aruz in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900, with a total of 2 versions, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
The OTR price of Honda WR-V in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Perodua Aruz is indeed RM 17,000 cheaper than Honda WR-V. If your budget is limited, the entry-level version of Perodua can already meet daily needs. But also note, the few thousand Ringgit cheaper price might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Perodua Aruz is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Honda WR-V is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain, the driving experience is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
The safety rating of Perodua Aruz is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include.
The safety rating of Honda WR-V is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Honda SENSING.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive in this class. New cars these days have good safety, no need to worry too much about this.
Perodua Aruz body length is 4400 mm, boot space is 400 L.
Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, boot space is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not large. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Perodua Aruz uses FWD drivetrain.
Honda WR-V uses FWD drivetrain.
Both cars have the same drivetrain, both are FWD, daily driving experience will not differ too much.
In general, Perodua Aruz and Honda WR-V are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time doing research is never wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Perodua Ativa 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Ativa 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 62,500 - 73,400，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.0L Turbo X（RM 62,500）、1.0L Turbo H（RM 67,300）、1.0L Turbo AV（RM 73,400）等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930，合共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate（RM 119,930）、2026 1.5L Urban（RM 109,930）等。
從價錢嚟睇，Perodua Ativa 嘅起價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 47,430。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，喺配備上可能有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Ativa 配備 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Mitsubishi Xforce 配備 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比 Perodua Ativa 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區行，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Perodua Ativa 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ASA 3.0 + ACC + LDA + LKA + BSM + RCTA。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算給得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢點。
Perodua Ativa 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mitsubishi Xforce 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Perodua Ativa 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場好好嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵主要係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嚟比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較，幫你省卻做功課嘅時間。
Mazda CX-30 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 122,409 - 146,409，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L High+ Premium（RM 146,409）、2025 2.0L High+（RM 138,409）、2025 2.0L High（RM 130,409） 等。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 129,750 - 129,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2025 1.5T 90km CSH（RM 129,750）、Tiggo 7 PHEV 支援邊種充電方法？可以喺居家電源插座度充電？（RM 117,478）等。
從價錢睇，Mazda CX-30 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 平咗 RM 7,341。如果你預算有限，Mazda 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但要記住，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上要有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Mazda CX-30 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 i-Activsense。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面，兩款車都揾到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Mazda CX-30 嘅 i-Activsense 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 嘅 Basic 喺功能上有啲分別，如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話，可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
Mazda CX-30 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。最尾都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總嚟講，Mazda CX-30 同 Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Mazda CX-60 and Mercedes-Benz GLC when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price range and positioning. Today we will do a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Mazda CX-60 in Malaysia is RM 200,510 - 252,873, with a total of 2 versions, including 2026 3.3T 4WD High Plus (RM 252,873), 2025 2.5L 2WD High (RM 200,510), etc.
The OTR price for Mercedes-Benz GLC in Malaysia is RM 336,888 - 336,888, with a total of 2 versions, including GLC 200 (RM 290,000), GLC 300 (RM 340,000), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Mazda CX-60 is indeed RM 136,378 cheaper than Mercedes-Benz GLC. If your budget is limited, Mazda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Mazda CX-60 is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl engine, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
Mercedes-Benz GLC is equipped with a 2.0L Turbo engine, 220 hp. Official fuel consumption 9.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 2.0L Turbo of Mercedes-Benz GLC has 50 more horsepower than the 2.0L 4-cyl of Mazda CX-60. However, in daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient and will not feel weak.
Mazda CX-60 body length 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
Mercedes-Benz GLC body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
In terms of space, the Mazda CX-60 body is 100 mm longer than Mercedes-Benz GLC, so the interior seating space will be slightly more spacious, especially rear legroom. If you frequently carry family or need to place a stroller, the larger body is indeed more practical.
Mazda CX-60 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mercedes-Benz GLC warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, both Mazda CX-60 and Mercedes-Benz GLC are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and going for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家在揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，而家我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 123,750 - 123,750，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 125,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 140,000） 等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition（RM 189,538）、2024 2.0L S EyeSight（RM 177,538）、2024 2.0L L EyeSight（RM 167,538） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 嘅起價確實比 Subaru Forester 平咗 RM 50,250。如果你預算有限，Chery 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 保固 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Forester 保固 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
兩款車嘅保固條件一樣，呢方面唔使糾結。實際保養成本仲要睇品牌嘅服務網絡同零件價格，建議去車友群問問真實車主嘅經驗。
Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用車、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，Chery Tiggo 7 Pro 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場幾好嘅車型。揀邊一部，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
車型概覽
名爵ZS HEV 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講花出去嘅錢係咪換到每日都用得着嘅便利，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。 近期市場討論到「MG ZS HEV套混能系統有咩甘特別？」，代表呢類車型仍然有一定關注度。
零售價 HK$ 165,592、完稅價 HK$ 248,000 令預算位置更清楚，買家可以先估算月供、保險、泊車同日常開支。
購車價格指南
名爵ZS HEV 嘅購車預算可以先由 零售價 HK$ 165,592、完稅價 HK$ 248,000 開始計。香港買車唔只係睇車價，月供、保險、牌費、泊車同能源成本都會影響每月壓力。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2025 1.5L Standard（HK$ 248,000） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 名爵ZS HEV 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
1.83 kWh 嘅電池容量，真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 102 Ps / 75 kW / 100 kW、128/250 N·m 嘅輸出，令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 4430 mm、車闊 1818 mm、車高 1635 mm、軸距 2610 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 混合動力專用(DHT)、前置前駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
名爵ZS HEV 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：預算位置清楚，方便同同級車直接比較、電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣。
要留意嘅係，要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 名爵ZS HEV 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「名爵 ZS 的車廂空間同實用性係點樣？」簡單講，名爵 ZS 為小型 SUV，車廆空間靈活實用，後排同尾箱適合日常代步。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 名爵ZS HEV 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先用 零售價 HK$ 165,592、完稅價 HK$ 248,000 鎖定預算圈、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 名爵ZS HEV 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項，電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
車型概覽
平治Sprinter 值唔值得睇，第一步唔係望牌子或者外形，而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講值唔值得繼續觀望，幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認，買家可以先把佢放入候選名單，等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
平治Sprinter 目前售價仍未清晰，較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式，等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀，可以先將 2026 Standard（價格待確認） 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用，家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點
睇 平治Sprinter 嘅規格，重點唔係背數字，而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
平治Sprinter 現階段最值得留意係車型定位同版本方向，詳細取捨應該等價格同規格更清楚再作決定。
優缺點分析
平治Sprinter 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳，真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心：車型定位清楚，適合作為同級比較起點。
要留意嘅係，售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點，但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 平治Sprinter 之前，真正要問嘅唔係單一規格，而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 係咪一部私家車？」簡單講，唔係，Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 係一款大型商用客貨車。 放到實際用車，就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 平治Sprinter 放入同級車清單時，唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係：先等售價落實，再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活：平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入，先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 平治Sprinter 唔係買車一刻就完結，之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行，視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情；如果經常行高速或跨區，座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
