喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Toyota Harrier 同 Subaru Forester 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Harrier 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 289,000 - 289,000,一共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard(RM 289,000) 等等。
Subaru Forester 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 174,000 - 197,000,一共有 3 個版本,包括 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition(RM 189,538)、2024 2.0L S EyeSight(RM 177,538)、2024 2.0L L EyeSight(RM 167,538) 等等。
由價錢睇落,Subaru Forester 嘅入門價比 Toyota Harrier 平咗 RM 115,000。講真,喺呢個價位段,幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Toyota Harrier 配備 2.0L Turbo,馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
Subaru Forester 配備 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Toyota Harrier 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比 Subaru Forester 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 多咗 50 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Subaru Forester 嘅油耗可能更抵,日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。

Toyota Harrier 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Brand ADAS。
Subaru Forester 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP),主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面,兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Toyota Harrier 嘅 Brand ADAS 同 Subaru Forester 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有啲差異,如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話,可以仔細比較吓兩者嘅功能列表。

Toyota Harrier 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Subaru Forester 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。

總括嚟講,Toyota Harrier 同 Subaru Forester 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較吓幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Toyota Harrier and Hyundai Santa Fe when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Toyota Harrier's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 289,000 - 289,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard (RM 289,000) and so on.
Hyundai Santa Fe's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 225,000 - 270,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2025 2.5T DCT 4WD Calligraphy 6 Seats (RM 270,000), 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige 7 Seats (RM 245,000), 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prime 7 Seats (RM 225,000) and so on.
In terms of price, Hyundai Santa Fe's starting price is RM 64,000 cheaper than Toyota Harrier. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant, the key is still looking at overall value for money and long-term usage costs.

Toyota Harrier is equipped with a 2.0L Turbo, 220 hp. Official fuel consumption 9.5 L/100km.
Hyundai Santa Fe is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Harrier's 2.0L Turbo has 50 more horsepower than Hyundai Santa Fe's 2.0L 4-cyl, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Hyundai Santa Fe's fuel consumption might be more favorable, and the difference for daily city commuting will not be too large.

Toyota Harrier body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Hyundai Santa Fe body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not large. Cars of this class are completely sufficient for daily use.

Toyota Harrier uses FWD drive mode.
Hyundai Santa Fe uses FWD drive mode.
The drive modes of the two cars are the same, both are FWD, there will not be much difference in daily driving feel.

Toyota Harrier warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Hyundai Santa Fe warranty 5 years/300,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.

Overall, Toyota Harrier and Hyundai Santa Fe are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking time to do research is never wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Toyota Harrier and Chery Tiggo 9 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price range and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
Toyota Harrier's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 289,000 - 289,000, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 HEV 2.5L Standard (RM 289,000) and more.
Chery Tiggo 9's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 166,800 - 179,800, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 2.0T Standard (RM 179,750) and more.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Chery Tiggo 9 is RM 122,200 cheaper than Toyota Harrier. Honestly, in this price range, a difference of a few thousand is not that significant; the key is looking at the overall value and long-term usage costs.

Toyota Harrier is powered by a 2.0L Turbo, 220 hp. Official fuel consumption 9.5 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 9 is powered by a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Toyota Harrier's 2.0L Turbo has 50 more horsepower than Chery Tiggo 9's 2.0L 4-cyl, providing more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, Chery Tiggo 9's fuel consumption might be more friendly, and the difference in daily city commuting is not too large.

Toyota Harrier's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Chery Tiggo 9's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Toyota Harrier's Brand ADAS and Chery Tiggo 9's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare their feature lists carefully.

Toyota Harrier body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 9 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. For cars in this class, they are fully sufficient for daily use.

Toyota Harrier uses FWD drive mode.
Chery Tiggo 9 uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars have the same drive mode, both are FWD, so there won't be much difference in the daily driving experience.

Overall, Toyota Harrier and Chery Tiggo 9 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from several car dealers, and test drive before making a final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time researching will never be wrong.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers tend to compare the Toyota Fortuner and Mercedes-Benz GLB when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning, so today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Toyota Fortuner's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 195,880 - 241,880, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel (RM 241,880), 2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol (RM 202,880), 2024 2.4L Standard Diesel (RM 195,880), etc.
The Mercedes-Benz GLB's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 299,888 - 352,888, with a total of 1 version, including Standard (RM 299,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the Toyota Fortuner's starting price is indeed RM 104,008 cheaper than the Mercedes-Benz GLB. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, note that the few thousand cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific requirements.

The Toyota Fortuner is equipped with 2.5L Diesel, with 187 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.5 L/100km.
The Mercedes-Benz GLB is equipped with 2.0L Turbo, with 220 hp. Official fuel consumption is 9.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Mercedes-Benz GLB's 2.0L Turbo has 33 more horsepower than the Toyota Fortuner's 2.5L Diesel. However, for daily city driving, the power of both cars is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.

The Toyota Fortuner's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include .
The Mercedes-Benz GLB's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), active safety systems include Premium ADAS.

The Toyota Fortuner vehicle length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The Mercedes-Benz GLB vehicle length is 4400 mm, trunk is 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, they are more than enough for daily use.

Both Toyota Fortuner and Mercedes-Benz GLB are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, hands-on experience is the most important.

In general, Toyota Fortuner and Mercedes-Benz GLB are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that everyone do their research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a major matter, spending some time on research will never be wrong.

Natural rubber prices continue to strengthen, adding further cost pressure on the tire industry.
As of Oct. 12, the main contract of natural rubber futures at the Shanghai Futures Exchange closed at 20,640 Yuan/ton, once breaking 21,000 Yuan intraday, creating a new high since 2017. The spot market rose synchronously; as of Oct. 9, the average price in the domestic natural rubber market reached 19,700 Yuan/ton, up 28.27% cumulatively this year and 31.45% year-on-year.

Rising raw material prices are pushing tire enterprises to adjust prices centrally, but whether price hikes can cover cost increases still depends on channel acceptance and end-user demand performance.
El Niño and Tightening Supply Drive Rubber Prices Higher
This round of natural rubber price increase, weather factors have become an important catalyst.
According to relevant climate monitoring information, sea surface temperatures in the equatorial central-eastern Pacific anomalously rose in September 2026, the expectation formed by the super El Niño event intensified market concerns about subsequent natural rubber production cuts.

Global natural rubber main production areas are concentrated in Southeast Asia, rubber tree growth and tapping operations are relatively sensitive to climate conditions. Continuous drought may affect latex secretion, while heavy rainfall will reduce the number of effective tapping days. Currently, rainfall in some parts of Thailand affects the tapping rhythm, and the market is also paying attention to the impact of El Niño on fourth-quarter supply in major production areas such as Thailand and Indonesia.
Long-term changes on the supply side are equally important. Natural rubber production cycle is long; rubber trees typically need to grow for 6 to 8 years before entering the commercial tapping stage. In past years, insufficient investment in new plantings and rubber plantation updates, aging rubber trees in some traditional production areas constrain supply increase growth.

The Association of Natural Rubber Producing Countries predicts global natural rubber production in 2026 will be about 15.039 million tons, up 0.6% year-on-year; demand will be about 15.356 million tons, up 0.4%. Based on this estimate, the annual supply-demand gap will be about 317,000 tons.
Falling inventory also supports prices. Data shows, as of Oct. 12, China's natural rubber social inventory is about 1.096 million tons, down 130,000 tons month-on-month.
However, supply performance from global rubber-producing countries is not consistent, with Thailand's production still expected to grow. Whether subsequent rubber prices can continue to rise needs verification from actual production and inventory data.
Rising Raw Material Costs, Increased Corporate Operating Pressure
For the tire industry, the impact of rising natural rubber prices is gradually becoming apparent.
All-steel tires have a high dependence on natural rubber, truck and bus tire enterprises are more easily directly affected by rubber price fluctuations. Semi-steel tires, although having a higher proportion of synthetic rubber, similarly cannot completely escape the cost pressure brought by natural rubber price hikes. Combined with rising prices of raw materials such as synthetic rubber and carbon black, tire enterprises face a situation where multiple costs rise simultaneously.
Price hikes have thus become an important means for enterprises to alleviate pressure. Since September, tire enterprises have frequently issued price adjustment letters, and the scope of price hikes has continued to expand, reflecting the transmission of upstream cost pressure to the downstream.

But it needs to be noted that price adjustment letters do not equal actual transaction price increases. After tire enterprises adjust ex-factory prices, they need to transmit to the terminal through distributors, retail stores, etc. If market competition is fierce and consumers are price-sensitive, the terminal price increase may be lower than the factory price adjustment magnitude.
This also means differences will emerge in the ability of different enterprises to bear cost pressure. Head enterprises with larger procurement scales, well-designed supply chain layouts, and higher brand premiums usually possess more room for cost management.
In contrast, small and medium-sized tire enterprises are relatively weak in terms of capital, orders, and bargaining power. If terminal price hikes are not smooth, profit margins may narrow further.
Q4 Trend Still Has Variables, Focus on Supply and Demand Changes
Looking ahead to the fourth quarter, the natural rubber market will continue to be influenced by weather, supply, inventory, and demand.
If Thailand's peak production season supply recovery falls short of expectations, while production cuts in production areas such as Indonesia occur, the global supply-demand gap may widen further, and rubber prices still have support. Conversely, if weather impacts are weaker than expected and production area supplies gradually recover, the risk premiums accumulated previously may fall back.
Demand side is also key. Raw material price hikes can push tire enterprises to raise prices, but it may also raise dealer inventory costs, affecting channel procurement enthusiasm. If terminal demand cannot follow up synchronously, the cost transfer space brought by price hikes will be limited.

For tire enterprises, in the following, need to pay attention to raw material price changes, and also control inventory and capital occupation, avoiding blind stockpiling at high price stages. For dealers, need to arrange procurement combined with actual sales rhythm, and cannot expand inventory solely based on price hike expectations.
Overall, natural rubber supply growth has slowed, providing fundamental support for current rubber prices, but after prices continue to rise, downstream affordability will also become an important constraining factor.
How this round of market trends ultimately evolves depends not only on how high natural rubber can rise, but also on whether tire enterprises can successfully transmit cost pressure to the market.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拎 Toyota Corolla Cross 同 Mazda CX-8 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就由多個方面做個詳細比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Toyota Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800,合共 3 個版本,包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport(RM 148,800)、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard(RM 140,800)、2026 1.8L Standard(RM 133,800) 等。
Mazda CX-8 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 165,360 - 201,360,合共 5 個版本,包括 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol(RM 201,360)、2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel(RM 193,123)、2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol(RM 186,360) 等。
由價錢睇,Toyota Corolla Cross 嘅起步價確實比 Mazda CX-8 平咗 RM 31,560。如果你預算有限,Toyota 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但要記住,平嘅嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體要看你嘅需求。

Toyota Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mazda CX-8 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。

Toyota Corolla Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mazda CX-8 保修 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

Toyota Corolla Cross 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,就揀配置豐富嗰款。最終都建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先至最重要。

總括嚟講,Toyota Corolla Cross 同 Mazda CX-8 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先去試駕先至做最終決定。買車係件大嚟嘅事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Toyota Yaris Cross and Mitsubishi Xforce when choosing a car. These two models are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
Mitsubishi Xforce OTR price in Malaysia is RM 109,930 - 119,930. There are 2 versions in total, including 2026 1.5L Ultimate (RM 119,930), 2026 1.5L Urban (RM 109,930), etc.
In terms of price, Toyota Yaris Cross's starting price is indeed RM 10,030 cheaper than Mitsubishi Xforce. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version is enough to meet daily needs. But note, the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.

Toyota Yaris Cross comes with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Mitsubishi Xforce comes with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Regarding power, Mitsubishi Xforce's 1.5L Turbo has 35 hp more than Toyota Yaris Cross's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, and you won't feel underpowered.

Toyota Yaris Cross body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Mitsubishi Xforce body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, it is fully sufficient for daily use.

Toyota Yaris Cross adopts FWD drive type.
Mitsubishi Xforce adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, daily driving feel will not differ much.

Toyota Yaris Cross and Mitsubishi Xforce are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Toyota Yaris Cross and Mitsubishi Xforce are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do research, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time on research will never be wrong.

August 2026, Australia new car market deliveries reached 108,760 units, up 4.9% year-on-year. Behind the stable figures lies a historic shift in powertrains: 27,078 Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) were delivered, surging 169.4% year-on-year. With a market share of 24.9%, BEVs surpassed petrol, diesel, and hybrid for the first time, becoming the top powertrain type in Australia; Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs) also grew 171.1% to 10,591 units. The Tesla Model Y topped the overall model sales list, while BYD secured second place among brands with 8,231 units (+68.8%), making New Energy brands the biggest winners of the month.

As pickups bear heavy-load tasks such as hauling, towing, and off-roading, their requirements for range and power are far higher than ordinary passenger cars; consequently, their electrification lags significantly behind the overall market — but August data shows they can no longer stay isolated.

Toyota Hilux retained the pickup title with 4,833 units, but saw only a slight increase of 0.2% year-on-year, essentially standing still. Ford Ranger suffered a cliff-like drop, delivering only 2,440 units, plummeting 50.6% year-on-year — primarily due to a temporary delivery halt caused by safety concerns with side air curtains, resulting in a monthly loss of about 2,500 units, which is a supply-side shock rather than a demand collapse.

Isuzu D-Max delivered 1,708 units (-26.2%), Mitsubishi Triton 1,161 units (-23.8%), and Mazda BT-50 recorded 804 units (-29.4%); all three Japanese diesel pickups declined by double digits. Volkswagen Amarok 306 units (-27.7%), Nissan Navara 277 units (-53.2%), and Kia Tasman performed the worst with only 312 units, down 61.1% year-on-year.

Pickups manufactured in China continued to expand their presence. BYD Shark 6 led Chinese brand pickups with 1,385 units, followed closely by Great Wall Cannon with 827 units. Adding Maxus LDV pickups (T60 + Terron 9 totaling 423 units), Foton Tunland V7 (124 units), MG U9 (115 units), JAC T9 (77 units), and others, total Chinese pickups reached approximately 2,951 units, accounting for about 18.5% of the Australian pickup market. In contrast, vehicles manufactured in Thailand delivered 15,658 units in August, down 24.7% year-on-year, driven almost entirely by the contraction of the pickup segment — Thailand is the main production base for Japanese pickups.

Amidst the general decline, BYD Shark 6 grew 9.8% year-on-year, reaching a year-to-date total of 12,094 units, becoming one of the few mainstream pickups with positive growth. Its PHEV positioning balances electric driving experience with pickup utility needs, coupled with BYD's strong brand power and more competitive pricing, opening up new volume outside of traditional diesel pickups. Notably, New Energy itself is not a guarantee of growth; brand momentum, pricing, and supply rhythm are key.

The full-size pickup market showed clear divergence. Ford F-150 delivered 152 units (surged from a low base), Chevrolet Silverado 1500 delivered 148 units (-6.9%), and RAM 1500 fell 32.6% to 149 units. Premium pickups above A$100,000 overall grew 18.1% to 764 units, forming a contrast with mainstream market weakness.

Final thoughts: August data clearly shows that even in the pickup segment where electrification is inevitably lagging, traditional fuel powertrains are also feeling a clear chill. Ranger's delivery halt amplified the decline. BYD Shark 6's growth against the trend validated the viability of PHEVs in the pickup market. Chinese brands like Great Wall Cannon, Maxus LDV, and others became an undeniable force in the Australian pickup market through stable sales volumes and forward-looking new energy layouts. With Ranger resuming deliveries in September and more hybrids and EV pickups entering the market, how the Australian pickup landscape will change again remains to be seen.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Honda CR-V 同 Hyundai Tucson 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省咗做功課嘅時間。
Honda CR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 178,200 - 195,900,一共有 4 個版本,包括 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS(RM 195,900)、2026 1.5T 4WD V(RM 181,900)、2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E(RM 178,200)等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888,一共有 5 個版本,包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige(RM 197,888)、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige(RM 186,888)、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime(RM 164,888)等。
由價錢嚟睇,Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價比 Honda CR-V 平咗 RM 34,312。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長遠使用成本。

Honda CR-V 配備 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
动力方面,Honda CR-V 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,特別係跑高速公路嗰陣超车。不過 Hyundai Tucson 嘅油耗可能更抵,日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。

Honda CR-V 車身長 4500 mm,車尾箱 450 L。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm,車尾箱 400 L。
空間方面,Honda CR-V 嘅車身比 Hyundai Tucson 長咗 100 mm,車內乘坐空間會稍微寬鬆啲,特別係後座腳位空間。如果你經常載家人或者需要放嬰兒車,車身大少少的確更實用。

Honda CR-V 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先係最重要嘅。

總嚟講,Honda CR-V 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛,關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

On August 26, themed on "Steady Happiness", Chery Fengyun T7 was officially launched. The new car launches in 3 versions, official guide price 97,900 - 118,900 yuan, priority trade-in price 94,900 - 115,900 yuan, and achieves delivery upon launch, bringing a new global quality choice to the 100,000-class home pure electric SUV market.

At the press conference, famous musician Kevin Wu served as Fengyun T7 "Happiness Experience Officer", engaged in dialogue with Chery Auto Executive Vice President Li Xueyong around "Steady Happiness", discussed real needs of family travel, conveyed the car-making philosophy "Crafting Quality Takes Time", jointly launched "Happiness Co-creation Plan", and called on the public to discover happiness moments in life.

As a native global vehicle, Fengyun T7 is not simply restyling domestic models for export. The new car relies on the global 1+7+N R&D system, has undergone a 3-year R&D cycle, is developed benchmarking the 2026 version E-NCAP 5-star safety standards, completes vehicle verification in 21 countries, accumulates extensive durability testing, undergoes extreme environment trials such as high temperature, extreme cold, high humidity, high salinity, adaptable to -40°C ~ 55°C ultra-wide temperature range, covering 95% of global road types. Its sister model Lepas L6 has launched in South Africa, Thailand, and will land in EU, Australia & New Zealand and other overseas markets later.

On the product level, Fengyun T7 revolves around four core values: Super Performance, Global Aesthetics, Safer, Smart Intelligence, building "Six Redundancies" hardcore strength: Crash Safety, Battery Safety, Range Equality, All-domain Energy Saving, Handling Performance, Vehicle Validation. All series standard equipped with 65.05kWh Rhino Battery, CLTC range 600km, actual test reaches 681.6km, achieves exceeding claimed rating, 30%-80% fast charging takes only 20 minutes. Equipped with dual-source wide-temperature heat pump AC, solving low-temperature range degradation pain points. In terms of safety, 80% high-strength steel rock-solid body, 9 airbags, 31-layer 6D chainmail battery protection, build a double safety fortress; class-first launch 8775 cockpit-driving integrated chip, paired with Lingxi Smart Cockpit 2.0 and Doubao Large Model, supports 300+ full-scenario automatic parking, highway pilot assist, smart experience maxed out.

Regarding purchase benefits, from now until September 30, ordering enjoys 8 benefit packs, including limited-time free custom colors, interest-free finance, trade-in subsidy, power battery and driver assistance dual coverage, whole vehicle lifetime warranty, low cost lifetime basic maintenance, data benefits, etc., pre-sale 1,000 yuan deposit deducts 2,000 yuan purchase payment policy extended to August 31.

Relying on global standards, strict verification, fully equipped strength and sincere pricing, Fengyun T7 redefines the value benchmark for 100,000-class pure electric SUVs, allowing ordinary families to also own a global quality travel experience, guarding the steady happiness on every journey.
