8 月 12 日,奇瑞風雲 T7 開啟預售,預售價 10.99 萬到 12.99 萬,定位全球品質純電 SUV,講的故事係「慢工造好車」,亮出嘅底牌係奇瑞 23 年全球化積澱。10 萬級純電 SUV 係眼下競爭最密集嘅價位段,風雲 T7 喺呢個時刻將「全球標準」敘事壓入嚟,打法好明確。

发布会把这台车拆成六个刚需:颜值、安全、出行、智能、舒享、安心。挨个看数字。
颜值放在第一刚需。依托奇瑞 10 个全球设计中心、5000 多名用户共创,同源海外版本上过米兰设计周。6 款配色加天际霞光尾门,走的是国际简约与东方气韵结合的路子。
安全是这车花力气最大的地方。官方数据,2 年策划 3 年研发,81 台专属耐久车同步路试,整车测试超 600 万公里,耐久专项 145 万公里,还针对东南亚雨季、中东高温、印尼高湿做了极限试炼。车身 80% 高强度钢、18.84% 热成型钢,九横五纵笼式结构,全系 9 气囊含 48L 双腔远端气囊和后排侧气囊,对标 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星和 ASIL D。把远端气囊和笼式结构做全系标配,是这个价位的加分项,投入不是 PPT,是真跑了里程的。
出行讲全系平权。全系标配 65.05kWh 犀牛电池,CLTC 600km,官方实测 667km 以上,30% 充到 80% 二十分钟。全系一个续航配置,不分低配缩水,这点对 10 万级用户实在。热管理上双源宽热泵加高压 PTC,标称零下 30 度到 55 度稳定运转,北方冬天也能用。全气候适配,是出海车型带回来的真好处。
智能分两块。座舱是舱驾一体 8775 芯片,4nm 制程、72TOPS,开机提速 33%。15.6 英寸 2.5K 屏,CarPlay、HiCar、CarLink 无线全覆盖。辅助驾驶是猎鹰 500,3 颗毫米波加 7 个摄像头加 12 个超声波共 22 颗传感器,主打 300 多个泊车场景,断头路、跨楼层、循迹倒车都能做。22 颗传感器不算顶配,但泊车场景覆盖是实打实的卖点。
舒享给得也满。轴距 2700mm,得房率 84%,后排 911mm 腿部空间,座椅放倒 1955mm 纯平。9 层云感座椅带通风加热,零下 20 度 5 分钟加热到 30 度。底盘由玛莎拉蒂背景的前专家团队调校,50.8 比 49.2 的轴荷比。底盘是这台车少被提起、却最见功底的部分。
安心这块是权益。两大兜底加两项终身:电池热失控损毁赔同款新车,辅助驾驶在泊车和领航场景出事最高赔 500 万;整车终身质保含三电,666 元买终身基础保养。
风云 T7 这套打法,是奇瑞把 23 年全球化研发和制造积淀,压进 10 万级纯电 SUV 的一次集中落地。六项刚需覆盖得扎实,10.99 万起的卡位把全球车叙事拉进了主流家庭预算。从纸面到口碑,差的是交付节奏和实车稳定性,这两件事要用时间证明。

8 月 12 號,風雲 T7 正式開啟預售。同日,#全球車快唔到一點#嘅話題喺社交平台迅速發酵。呢句略帶反諷嘅 slogan,戳中嘅係當下新能源車市場一個心照不宣嘅痛點——速成車。

呢兩年新能源車迭代速度越來越快,"18 個月一款新車"幾乎係業界默認節奏。由立项到上市,研發週期被壓縮、驗證里程被砍半、海外法規測試能省就省。結果就係,用戶買到嗰陣嘅車,參數靚、發布會驚艷,但開上兩三年,小毛病不斷、保值率跳水。速成車唔係某一家嘅問題,係行業集體焦慮下嘅產物。所以当風雲 T7 把"快唔到一點"四個字擺喺台面上,少少有種行業自白嘅味道。

風雲 T7 偏偏揀咗另一條路。2 年策劃、3 年研發,光耐久驗證就跑咗 145 萬公里,投入 963 台試驗車,跨越高溫、高寒、高原、高濕、高鹽鹼五大極限環境。北極極寒工況下,熱泵 +PTC 雙源製熱 20 分鐘就嚟把座艙從低溫拉到 20℃,冬季續航達成率提升 30%;熱帶多雨地帶,500mm 涉水深度從容應對。呢啲數字睇嚟枯燥,背後係工程師團隊喺零下 40 度嘅西伯利亞、巴西砂石路、墨西哥鵝卵石路上一遍又一遍磨出嚟嘅。一個細節令我印象深:泰國用戶偏好重手感轉向,團隊專門加一級轉向力調校;土耳其、以色列用戶習慣實體按鈕,高頻功能就保留硬開關——呢種"慢",慢喺為唔同市場做差異化。

更值得講嘅係標準。風雲 T7 直接對標 2026 版 E-NCAP 設計——呢係歐洲即將上線嘅史上最嚴苛安全法規,好多品牌連現行嘅 E-NCAP 都仲喺補課,風雲 T7 已經把目標定到兩年後。呢樣就代表住車身結構、被動安全、主動安全都要按更高門檻預埋。高強度鋼佔比 80%、熱成型鋼佔比 18.84%、9 安全氣囊、shotgun 結構、1088mm 貫穿式輥壓門檻梁——呢啲唔係上市先至補嘅配置,係從圖紙階段就刻入基因入面嘅。

設計上同樣唔趕時間。全球 10 大設計中心、百幾名設計師協同,5000+ 用戶深度共創。同源車型 LEPAS L6 今年亮相米蘭設計周,歐洲媒體嘅評價係"耐看"。喺呢個"顏值內捲"到一週一個新車頭嘅時代,能俾歐洲設計圈講一句"耐看",比一時驚艷難得啱多。

底盤呢塊更見功夫。瑪莎拉蒂前底盤調校專家領銜,歐洲團隊深度參與,針對 160km/h+ 超高速段專項調校。50.8:49.2 嘅黃金軸荷比、560mm 重心高度、70mm 大尺寸襯套——呢啲參數老司機一睇就識,係把"好開"當做系統工程喺做,而唔係堆幾個亮眼嘅零百數據。底盤調校係最騙唔到人嘅環節,PPT 吹得再響,過個減速帶就露餡。

風雲 T7 敢叫"全球車",唔係營銷話術。同源車型 LEPAS L6 已經喺南非預售、泰國 7 月 24 號上市,8 月印尼、9 月歐盟、10 月澳新英國以色列馬來,節奏排到滿滿當當。奇瑞連續 23 年位居中國品牌乘用車出口第一,全球 2,000 萬用戶、覆蓋 130 多個國家——呢個係風雲 T7"慢"嘅底氣。冇呢套全球化體系支撐,"慢"就只係慢;有咗呢套體系,"慢"先至能轉化為全球通行證。

慢歸慢,最終要落喺產品上。CLTC 續航 600km、實測 667+km,"反向虛標"喺虛標成風嘅年代好稀缺;4nm 製程 8775 芯片座艙駕控一體,72TOPS 算力;獵鷹 500 駕駛輔助配 22 粒高精準傳感器。整車終身保養含三電、電池熱失控兜底賠新車、輔助駕駛事故最高賠 500 萬——呢三項兜底,比任何一句"放心買"都實在。

講到底,"全球車快唔到一點"呢句話,與其話係營銷,不如話係行業自白。速成車之所以速成,係因為市場逼住速成;風雲 T7 之所以慢,係因為佢把目標定喺全球市場、定喺五年後嘅口碑。短期可唔可以贏要睇節奏,但慢工出細活喺汽車行業從來都冇失效過。對消費者嚟講,多一台"慢"出嚟嘅車可選,總唔係壞事。

August 12, Chery Fengyun T7 entered the market with pre-sale prices ranging from 109,900 to 129,900 yuan, waving the banner "Good cars take time, we've kept you waiting." This pure electric SUV, born from global R&D and global validation, does not pile up flashy specs, but instead strikes a heavy blow at the industry's rush-to-market trend with three years of R&D and one million kilometers of actual testing.

I. Global Standards Refinement: Chery's Slow Craftsmanship Finally Produces Great Things
The creation process of Fengyun T7 itself constitutes a response to the industry's short-term logic. Chery did not choose to quickly release new models by changing shells, but invested in two years of planning and three years of R&D, bringing global regulations forward to the product definition stage. Benchmarking the 2026 Edition E-NCAP Five-Star Safety Standard, developing functionally safe ASILD high-level systems, while simultaneously meeting global data compliance requirements, this approach endowed Fengyun T7 with the genes of a global car from its inception.
Real-world feedback from overseas markets wrote a footnote to Fengyun T7's reliability. Its sibling model Lepas L6 has already launched earlier in South Africa and Thailand, gaining recognition from local users, and will subsequently enter markets such as Europe and Australia/New Zealand. In other words, Fengyun T7 is not an exam-oriented model specifically tailored for the domestic market, but an "elite student returning home" who first struggled in complex global environments before calmly returning to the Chinese market. This sequence of global verification followed by domestic launch is, in itself, a quality insurance policy.
More noteworthy is the underlying foundation of Chery being the top exporter for 23 consecutive years. 20 million global users and over 130 overseas markets mean Chery has massive data accumulation regarding road conditions, climate, and user habits in various regions. These accumulations have not stayed on PPTs, but transformed into over 80 localization adaptations, such as strengthening battery connector protection for Brazilian gravel roads and optimizing wiper lifespan for Northern European extreme cold. The skills honed by slow craftsmanship are now all precipitated on the Fengyun T7.

II. Quality Price Equality: Fengyun T7 Shakes Market Structure
The starting price of 109,900 yuan is like a deep-water bomb when placed among peer pure electric SUVs. This price point was previously dominated by entry-level models with a range of 400-500km, stingy safety configurations, and blank intelligent driving. Fengyun T7, however, directly comes standard with a 65.05kWh battery, 600km range, AGS active air intake grille, dual-source heat pump air conditioning, and even includes 9 airbags and a rock-solid body as standard across the entire range. Using top-tier hardware to attack entry-level prices is a clear dimensional strike.
Behind this pricing strategy is Chery's confidence in its global supply chain and economies of scale. The whole vehicle spreads R&D costs on a global sales scale of one million, rather than needing high prices to cover investment like new forces. More importantly, Fengyun T7 provides lifetime whole-vehicle warranty and battery safety protection from the start, and even offers up to 5 million yuan in compensation for assisted driving accidents. These rights hit home on family users' safety anxiety regarding electric vehicles, turning quality promises from slogans into black-and-white written contracts.
For Chery itself, Fengyun T7 is also a key move for brand upward mobility. The Fengyun sequence had established a technical image previously with models like A9, while T7, as the first global pure electric SUV, bears the heavy responsibility of expanding the results. With global quality endorsement and affordable prices, it shifts Chery's "honest engineering guy" label to a new perception of "reliable global carmaker". Once this perception is established, other models in the subsequent Fengyun family will benefit from it.

III. Value Reshaping Benchmark: Home Pure Electric Enters All-Dimensional Era
When most automakers are still using "smart fridges, large TVs, and big sofas" as selling points, the focus point of Fengyun T7 has returned to the essence of vehicle usage. It does not pursue extremes in any single parameter, but grabs the six essential needs of range, safety, intelligence, comfort, appearance, and peace of mind all at once. The full range 600km range is just the baseline; more importantly, it includes backups for assisted driving, automatic braking after collisions, and payouts for battery thermal runaway—these "invisible guarantees". These experiences cannot be quantified on a spec sheet, but directly determine whether a car can allow a whole family to drive safely for ten years.
From the perspective of industry competition patterns, the appearance of Fengyun T7 is rewriting the value scale of the 100,000-yuan market. Previously, users in this price range had to make trade-offs; if you wanted long range you had to sacrifice intelligent driving, if you wanted safety you had to accept mediocre design. Fengyun T7 responds to all pain points with global car standards, forcing competitors at the same price level to follow up with quality upgrades. It proves one thing: home pure electric should not be a product of parameter compromises, but the optimal solution after global resource integration.
In the second half of the pure electric track, competitiveness has shifted from piling materials to systems. The Chery global quality manufacturing system supporting Fengyun T7 covers the entire chain of R&D, verification, supply chain, and after-sales. This is not a lead in any single technology, but the thickness of the entire board game. When other brands are still competing on single selling points, Fengyun T7 has already redefined the passing line for home pure electric with the height of a global car. This pre-sale is just the beginning; what it will pry open is the entire niche market's re-examination of the word "Quality".


Conclusion:
Some once questioned that Chery joining the pure electric camp was too slow; now Fengyun T7 proves with three years of sharpening a sword's patience that slow is fast. Only after a thousand tests does a vessel become an instrument; true quality is seen in the global market. "Seemingly ordinary yet most extraordinary, seeming easy but actually arduous." When quick-fix cars begin to recede, the global cars that truly put effort into the dark places will ultimately reap the compound interest of time.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X90 and Honda CR-V when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
Honda CR-V's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 178,200 - 195,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD RS (RM 195,900), 2026 1.5T 4WD V (RM 181,900), 2026 e:HEV 2.0L 2WD E (RM 178,200), etc.
Looking at the price, the starting price of Proton X90 is indeed RM 71,400 cheaper than Honda CR-V. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. However, be aware that the few thousand dollars cheaper might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.

Proton X90 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Honda CR-V is equipped with a 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption is 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the 2.0L 4-cyl of Honda CR-V has 30 more horsepower than the 1.5L Turbo of Proton X90. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power and won't feel underpowered.

Proton X90 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Honda CR-V body length is 4500 mm, trunk 450 L.
In terms of space, the Honda CR-V's body is 100 mm longer than Proton X90, having an advantage in passenger space. However, Proton X90 is more flexible for parking in the city, each has its trade-offs.

Proton X90 adopts FWD drive configuration.
Honda CR-V adopts FWD drive configuration.
Both cars have the same drive configuration, both are FWD, there won't be a significant difference in daily driving experience.

Both Proton X90 and Honda CR-V are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, consider the one with better reputation first; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Proton X90 and Honda CR-V are both quite good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose mainly depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from multiple dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time on research will never go wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Subaru Forester when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Proton X70's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
Subaru Forester's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 174,000 - 197,000, with a total of 3 versions, including 2024 2.0L S EyeSight GT Edition (RM 189,538), 2024 2.0L S EyeSight (RM 177,538), 2024 2.0L L EyeSight (RM 167,538), etc.
In terms of price, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 67,200 cheaper than Subaru Forester. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the difference of a few thousand may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your needs.

Proton X70's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), with active safety systems including ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Subaru Forester's safety rating is 5★ (Euro NCAP), with active safety system including EyeSight.
Regarding safety features, both cars received good ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Subaru Forester's EyeSight. If you value active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both in detail.

Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Subaru Forester body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space does not differ much. Cars at this level are completely sufficient for daily use.

Proton X70 uses FWD drive mode.
Subaru Forester uses FWD drive mode.
Both cars use the same drive mode, both are FWD, and the daily driving experience will not be significantly different.
Overall, Proton X70 and Subaru Forester are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework well, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will never be wrong.

2026 年 8 月 6 日,smart 以城市 Live Show 形式举办新车发布会,正式推出全新一代 smart 精灵 1 号。新车限时权益价 14.99 万元起,提供 535 Max、535 Ultra 两款版型,整车完成超 200 项体验升级,手握 63 项同级领先、20 项同级唯一配置,围绕 “三电两智” 完成全方位进化,再度巩固全球豪华智能小车之王的行业地位。
初代 smart 精灵 1 号上市四年,足迹遍布全球 41 国,超 10 万车主累计行驶十几亿公里,斩获德国 iF、红点国际设计大奖,拿下中欧双五星安全认证,是品牌电动化出海的核心名片。如今小型纯电赛道竞争白热化,多数车型只能在三电、智驾、座舱单点发力,很难做到综合均衡。全新一代精灵 1 号整合四年全球用户反馈与市场调研成果,实现脱胎换骨的全面升级,拉高高端小型纯电车的价值天花板。

全系标配 800V 高压平台,三电系统彻底告别续航补能焦虑
新车最核心的竞争力,是全系搭载全球首个量子级 AI 电子电气架构 EEA 4.0 与 800V 碳化硅高压平台,硬件规格远超同级多数仅高配才搭载 400V 架构的竞品。
整车配备 6C 超快充技术,电量 10% 充至 80% 仅需 12 分钟,10 分钟可补充 300km 续航,日常通勤一周一充,跨城长途补能无需长时间等候。动力总成采用雷霆 16 合一高效智能电驱,兼顾动力输出与能耗表现;电池采用军工级标准神盾金砖电池,符合全新电池国标,全链路温控、防撞防护体系,从根源保障电池使用安全。
整套三电系统直击纯电车两大核心痛点:充电慢、续航焦虑,入门用户也能享受旗舰级补能效率,不管是日常通勤还是周末长途自驾,都能摆脱电量束缚。

双智能全面拉满,高阶智驾 + 旗舰座舱,新手也能轻松上手
智能驾驶与智能座舱两大板块,是新车提升日常用车幸福感的关键,配置直接拉满同级顶配水平。
智驾搭载满血版千里浩瀚 H5 辅助驾驶系统,配备英伟达 Orin Y 高算力芯片,辅以千亿参数 WAM 世界行为模型 G-ASD 4.0 方案,全车搭载含激光雷达在内的 31 个感知硬件。领航辅助覆盖城市、高速全场景,有导航即可开启辅助驾驶,针对环岛通行、无保护左转、窄巷错车等 20 余个城市复杂场景,车辆决策逻辑更贴合真人驾驶,流畅自然。
泊车能力更是同级天花板,机械立体车位、无标线空地都能自主泊入,支持离车泊入、指尖遥控泊车,狭窄车位车门打不开也能远程操作,后续还将通过 OTA 迭代实现车位到车位全链路智驾功能。
智能座舱主打 “上车即上手”,搭载同级唯一 4nm 龙鹰 6P 高算力芯片,车机操作毫秒级响应。15.4 英寸 2.5K 中控屏搭载深度定制 Flyme Auto 专属 smart OS,画面清晰细腻,交互逻辑直观易上手。“超级精灵” AI 语音助手可处理多目的地、多顺序复杂导航指令;AI 空调自动感知车内外温湿度、空气质量,智能调节座舱环境,全程无需手动反复操作,交互体验省心流畅。
奔驰原厂设计,小车身大空间,座舱舒适度越级豪华
整车由梅赛德斯 - 奔驰全球设计团队操刀,延续 smart 经典四轮四角 DNA,小巧车身自带大气场。本次铂金版专属日冕金车顶回归,推出白金、蓝金两款全新撞色配色;D 柱搭载同级独有的璀璨星辰发光 Logo,搭配 “Styled by Mercedes-Benz” 专属徽标,辨识度拉满,19 英寸旋翼轮毂、运动后扰流板进一步强化运动轻奢气质。
空间遵循 “紧凑于外,宽适于内” 理念,2750mm 轴距带来 84% 同级领先得房率,车内布局 28 处分区储物格,随身杂物收纳从容。座舱舒适性对标高端车型,新奢 SPA 舒享座椅采用 12 层复合叠层结构,主副驾配备 24 种按摩模式,同步搭载加热、通风功能,长途久坐也能舒缓疲劳。全车软质包覆面积超 5㎡,门板、中控大面积软性材质,扶手、杯托盖板采用 3D Mesh 环抱工艺,触感细腻高级;森海塞尔定制音响搭配 256 色动态氛围灯,视听氛围拉满,打造沉浸式出行座舱。

中欧双五星安全标准,奔驰联合底盘调校,全场景从容驾乘
安全是 smart 不可退让的底线,新车延续中欧双五星安全车身标准,84% 钢铝混合笼式车身构建坚固防护。主动安全新增 19 项辅助功能,包含自动紧急制动 AEB、后方交叉预警制动、爆胎稳定控制、驾驶员失能辅助等,主动规避道路各类风险,全方位守护驾乘人员。
底盘由 smart 与奔驰联合专属调校,德系底盘厚重扎实,过弯悬架支撑充足,路面颠簸过滤干净。小巧车身适配城市狭窄道路,掉头、并线灵活自如;154mm 离地间隙突破小型电车局限,铺装路面通勤、郊外非铺装小路、轻度烂路都能轻松通行。车辆配备 CST 智能舒适制动系统,大幅缓解刹车点头,搭配智能动能回收,起步、加减速全程平顺,减少车内人员眩晕感。

14.99 万起限时权益,全球同步剧透精灵 2 号新车计划
全新一代 smart 精灵 1 号限时权益价 14.99 万元起,叠加五大专属权益,综合价值超 2.5 万元,用户可通过 smart 汽车 APP、官方小程序线上锁单,抢先锁定首批购车福利。
本次发布会摒弃传统宣讲模式,打造沉浸式城市 Live Show,在真实通勤、快充、泊车场景实景实测,直观展现 200 项升级带来的实际体验。smart 品牌全球公司 CEO 佟湘北现场表示:“smart 精灵 1 号始终是豪华小车的品类标杆,过去是,现在是,未来也是。”
发布会同步放出重磅彩蛋,上海、墨尔本、巴黎、柏林、香港、布宜诺斯艾利斯六座全球城市连线催更全新 smart 精灵 2 号。官方透露,精灵 2 号全球街头艺术涂鸦计划已启动,量产车型将于 10 月巴黎车展全球首秀,备受全球用户期待。
四年前,初代精灵 1 号开启 smart 全面电动化转型;四年后,全新一代车型以三电、智驾、座舱、设计、安全、驾乘全维度均衡实力,重新定义高端小型纯电标准。当下新能源小车市场普遍存在产品偏科问题,而全新一代 smart 精灵 1 号兼顾奔驰设计底蕴、800V 极速快充、全场景高阶智驾、越级舒适座舱,14.99 万的定价极具竞争力。
对于追求城市精致代步、看重品牌质感,同时兼顾家用通勤、短途自驾的消费者而言,这款完成全面进化的豪华小车,补齐了初代车型补能、智能短板,保留了 smart 标志性灵动设计,是 15 万级纯电 SUV 里不可忽视的优质选择。

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and MG MG HS when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300. There are 3 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of MG MG HS in Malaysia is RM 130,450 - 146,450. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L Standard (RM 105,000), 1.5L Executive (RM 115,000), etc.
From the price perspective, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 23,650 cheaper than MG MG HS. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But be aware that the few thousand difference might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific requirements.
Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
MG MG HS is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving feel is basically the same daily. Fuel consumption is also similar, so no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Proton X70 is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP). Active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
The safety rating of MG MG HS is TBD. Active safety systems include Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Proton X70's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and MG MG HS's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can carefully compare the feature lists of both.
Proton X70 adopts FWD drive mode.
MG MG HS adopts FWD drive mode.
The drive mode of both cars is the same, both are FWD, and there won't be a big difference in daily driving feel.
Overall, Proton X70 and MG MG HS are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Choosing which one depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your research, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and then test driving to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending time doing research will definitely not be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細比較,幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L Standard 2WD(RM 106,800)、1.5L Executive 2WD(RM 115,800)、1.5L Premium 2WD(RM 122,300) 等。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000) 等。
從價錢嚟睇,寶騰 X70 嘅起價確實比 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 52,950。如果你預算有限,寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意,平嘅嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上面會有取捨,具體要睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 配備 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 配備 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面,奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 寶騰 X70 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多出 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩款車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅安全評級係 TBD,主動安全系統包括 Basic。
安全配備方面,兩款車都搵到唔錯嘅評級。不過 寶騰 X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 Basic 喺功能上面有少少分別,如果你比較睇重主動安全嘅話,可以仔細比較下兩者嘅功能列表。
寶騰 X70 保養 5 年/150,000km,保養間隔 每10,000km 或 6 個月。
奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 保養 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講,寶騰 X70 同 奇瑞 Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛,關鍵始終都要睇你個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X70 and Mazda CX-8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time doing research.
The OTR price of Proton X70 in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, totaling 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The OTR price of Mazda CX-8 in Malaysia is RM 165,360 - 201,360, totaling 5 versions, including 2025 2.5T 4WD High Plus Petrol (RM 201,360), 2025 2.2L 2WD High Plus Diesel (RM 193,123), 2025 2.5L 2WD High Plus Petrol (RM 186,360), etc.
In terms of pricing, the starting price of Proton X70 is indeed RM 58,560 cheaper than Mazda CX-8. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version is already sufficient for daily needs. But note that the cheaper few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your needs.

Proton X70 equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Mazda CX-8 equipped with 2.0L 4-cyl, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 8.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, Mazda CX-8's 2.0L 4-cyl has 30 more horsepower than Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo. However, for daily city driving, both cars have sufficient power, you won't feel underpowered.

Proton X70 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Mazda CX-8 safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include Brand ADAS.
Both cars have the same safety rating, safety features are quite comprehensive within this class. New car safety is generally good nowadays, no need to worry too much about this.

Proton X70 adopts FWD drive type.
Mazda CX-8 adopts FWD drive type.
Both cars have the same drive type, both are FWD, no big difference in daily driving experience.
Both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-8 are mainstream choices in the Malaysia market, suitable for family use, daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, choose the one with richer configurations. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Mazda CX-8 are very good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, compare quotes from several dealerships, then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big thing, spending time doing research will never be wrong.

In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X70 and Honda WR-V when choosing a car.
The Proton X70 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,300, with a total of 3 versions, including 1.5L Standard 2WD (RM 106,800), 1.5L Executive 2WD (RM 115,800), 1.5L Premium 2WD (RM 122,300), etc.
The Honda WR-V OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,900 - 107,900, with a total of 4 versions, including 2023 1.5L V (RM 99,900), 2023 1.5L E (RM 95,900), 2023 1.5L S (RM 89,900), etc.
In terms of price, the Honda WR-V's starting price is RM 16,900 cheaper than the Proton X70. To be honest, at this price point, a difference of a few thousand is not really significant; the key lies in overall value for money and long-term usage costs.

The Proton X70 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Honda WR-V is equipped with a 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption is 6.0 L/100km.
In terms of power, the Proton X70's 1.5L Turbo has 35 more horsepower than the Honda WR-V's 1.5L 4-cyl, offering more confidence in mid-range acceleration, especially when overtaking on highways. However, the Honda WR-V's fuel consumption might be more friendly, and the difference in daily city commuting would not be very large.

The Proton X70 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Honda WR-V body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost identical, with little difference in interior space. For this class of cars, daily use is more than enough.

Proton X70 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Honda WR-V warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Proton X70 and Honda WR-V are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing your homework, comparing quotes from several dealerships, and test driving before making a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, taking some time to research will definitely not be a mistake.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿 Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都蠻接近,而家我哋就由多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300,合共有 4 個版本,包括 1.5T Executive(RM 89,800)、1.5T Premium(RM 101,800)、1.5T Flagship(RM 113,300) 等等。
Mitsubishi Xforce 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 109,930 - 119,930,合共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 1.5L Ultimate(RM 119,930)、2026 1.5L Urban(RM 109,930) 等等。
由價錢睇,Proton X50 嘅起步價確實比 Mitsubishi Xforce 平咗 RM 20,130。如果你預算有限,Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體就要睇你嘅需要。

Proton X50 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Mitsubishi Xforce 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 MI-PILOT。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣,喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都不差,唔使太擔心呢一點。

Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Mitsubishi Xforce 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Mitsubishi 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感受,建議試駕比較。

Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最後都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身經歷先係最重要。

總體嚟講,Proton X50 同 Mitsubishi Xforce 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

On July 16, GAC Group held a grand event at its Trumpchi factory in Guangzhou — celebrating the rollout of the 30 millionth vehicle.
What does 30 million represent? In the history of the Chinese automotive industry, no more than one hand of automakers have reached this number. It took GAC 29 years from the rollout of the first Accord in 1997 to now.
But the interesting part of this event was not the number itself, but the state GAC presented.
The star rolling off the line was not a traditional fuel car, but a right-hand drive Trumpchi M8 PHEV. The recipient was not a domestic dealer representative, but a Thai car owner.
The identity and destination of this vehicle speak louder than the number 30 million.

Selling to Thailand
A detail at the venue was worth noting: Vehicles numbered 29,999,995 to 29,999,999 rolled off the line in sequence. They were GAC Honda P7, GAC Toyota bZ7, GAC Qijing GT7, GAC Aion N60, and GAC Hyper S600, all New Energy Vehicles.

This was not just a rollout ceremony; it was clearly GAC flexing its muscles. The joint venture sector, the independent sector, pure electric, plug-in hybrid, and right-hand drive vehicles, the entire New Energy vehicle matrix appeared collectively. GAC wants to say one thing: Regarding electrification, I am serious.

In the first half of this year, GAC Group sales reached 773,100 vehicles, a 2.35% year-on-year increase, with New Energy Vehicle sales growing by 68.8%. Overseas exports exceeded 120,000 vehicles, a significant 132% increase year-on-year.
The growth rate is impressive, but the base is still relatively small. In the current era of deep industry reshuffling, GAC needs to run faster.
Quality is the Bottom Line, What Cannot Be Lost
GAC Chairman Feng Xingya said a sentence at the event: “Quality is the bottom line GAC will never cede.” Listening to this sentence today, it is actually quite weighty.
In the past few years, the Chinese automotive industry engaged in fierce involution, competing on price, specs, and computing power. But some things are hard to compete on, such as the quality control system.

GAC's quality management system has its uniqueness: integrating Honda's Total Quality Management (TQM), Toyota's Production System (TPS), plus the pragmatic DNA in Lingnan culture. This system ensures that GAC's joint venture and independent brands have long been at the forefront of the industry in product reliability.
Data also supports this: The Star Spirit Safety Guard System covers nearly 2 million users, avoiding 6.28 million potential travel risks; the Magazine Battery has cumulatively equipped 1.5 million vehicles, with safe driving mileage exceeding 160 billion kilometers.
In today's era where the industry madly piles on specs and configurations, "no breakdowns" has become a scarce value.
After 30 Million, Where to Go?
Feng Xingya announced a policy at the event: Launching the "30 Million Vehicle Rollout · Renewal and Gratitude Season". GAC's six major brands — Honda, Toyota, Trumpchi, Aion, Hyper, Qijing — will launch their respective policies around new purchase, trade-in, and extra purchase.
This is an action on the service level. More worthy of attention is GAC's next technology roadmap.

In the powertrain field, GAC's "Star Source Power" will cover three technology roadmaps: extended-range, plug-in hybrid, and Super Twin Engine. The pilot production line for all-solid-state batteries has been completed, and the Quark Electric Drive motor has exceeded 99% maximum efficiency.
In the intelligent networking field, the Star Spirit architecture is connecting six systems: intelligent driving, cockpit, powertrain, chassis, body, and vehicle connectivity. The goal is "one brain for unified command". The partner list is also long — Huawei, CATL, Didi, Tencent, Alibaba.
As of now, GAC has cumulatively invested over 62 billion yuan in R&D, with a global R&D team exceeding 6,800 people.
This level of investment is considered quite substantial among traditional automakers.
In Conclusion
30 million units is a milestone, but for GAC it is more of a watershed.
In the past 29 years, GAC relied on joint ventures for foundation, quality for reputation, and supply chain advantages and manufacturing capabilities to walk to today step by step. But for the next 30 million units, relying on these alone is not enough.
New energy transformation cannot be slow, intelligentization cannot lag behind, and the overseas market must be conquered. This is the same test faced by all traditional automakers.
GAC's choice is: Quality cannot be lost, but technology cannot be slow, rhythm cannot be chaotic, and the global market cannot be abandoned.
It looks like an attack on all fronts, but the logic is actually simple — to catch up on necessary courses as soon as possible while holding the bottom line.
After 30 million, the real test has just begun.

In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
Perodua Aruz's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 72,900 - 77,900. There are 2 versions in total, including 1.5L X (RM 72,900), 1.5L AV (RM 77,900), etc.
Proton X90's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 106,800 - 122,800. There are 4 versions in total, including 2026 1.5T Prime X (RM 122,800), 2026 1.5T Prime (RM 116,800), 2026 1.5T Lite (RM 106,800), etc.
From a price perspective, Perodua Aruz's starting price is indeed RM 33,900 cheaper than Proton X90. If your budget is limited, Perodua's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, please note that the cheaper price may involve trade-offs in equipment, depending on your specific requirements.

Perodua Aruz body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Proton X90 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, with little difference in interior space. Cars of this class are fully sufficient for daily use.

Perodua Aruz warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Proton X90 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both cars have the same warranty conditions, no need to worry about this. Actual maintenance costs depend on the brand's service network and parts prices. It is recommended to ask real owners in car owner groups for their experience.

Both Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and second-hand price more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and equipment, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.

Overall, Perodua Aruz and Proton X90 are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest everyone do their research, compare quotes from several dealerships, and then go for a test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending some time on research will never be wrong.

喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場,好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 黎比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近,今日我哋就從多個方面黎做一個詳細嘅對比,幫你省下做功課嘅時間。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750,一共有 2 個版本,包括 1.6L Turbo Standard(RM 130,000)、1.6L Turbo Premium(RM 145,000)等。
Hyundai Tucson 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 143,888 - 197,888,一共有 5 個版本,包括 2025 HEV 1.6T AT 2WD Prestige(RM 197,888)、2025 1.6T DCT 4WD Prestige(RM 186,888)、2025 1.6T DCT 2WD Prime(RM 164,888)等。
從價錢嚟睇,Hyundai Tucson 嘅起步價比 Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 平咗 RM 15,862。實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千塊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 搭載 Hybrid,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 4.5 L/100km。
Hyundai Tucson 搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面,Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 嘅 Hybrid 比 Hyundai Tucson 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力,中段加速更有信心,尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過 Hyundai Tucson 嘅油耗可能更友好,日常市區通勤差別唔會太大。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
Hyundai Tucson 車身長 4400 mm,尾箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全够用。

Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Hyundai Tucson 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣,都係 FWD,日常駕駛感受唔會有太大區別。
Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇,適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價,可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款;如果你更在意性價比同配備,那就選配置更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕,親身體驗先至係最重要。
總嚟講,Chery Tiggo 8 PHEV 同 Hyundai Tucson 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵仲係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅轎車市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會揾豐田卡羅拉同福斯高夫嚟比較。呢兩部車喺價位同定位上都好接近,今日我哋就由多個方面嚟做個詳細對比,幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
豐田卡羅拉喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 144,800 - 149,800,一共有 2 個版本,包括 2026 年 1.8L GR Sport(RM 149,800)、2026 年 1.8L G(RM 144,800)等。
福斯高夫喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 186,530 - 186,530,一共有 1 個版本,包括 2026 年 1.5L R-Line(RM 186,530)等。
由價錢嚟睇,豐田卡羅拉嘅起步價確實比福斯高夫平咗 RM 41,730。如果你預算有限,豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意,平嗰幾千蚊,可能喺配備上會有取捨,具體要睇你嘅需求。

豐田卡羅拉搭載 1.5L Turbo,馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
福斯高夫搭載 2.0L 4-cyl,馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面,福斯高夫嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比豐田卡羅拉嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 30 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開,兩部車嘅動力都夠用,唔會覺得唔夠力。

豐田卡羅拉車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
福斯高夫車身長 4400 mm,行李箱 400 L。
兩部車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間分別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。

豐田卡羅拉保修 5 年/無限制里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
福斯高夫保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。

總體嚟講,豐田卡羅拉同福斯高夫都係馬來西亞市場幾正嘅車型。揀邊一部,關鍵都係要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,再去試車做最後決定。買車係件大事,花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

喺馬來西亞嘅汽車市場,好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶馬 X5 同 賓士 GLC 嚟做比較。今日我哋從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較,幫你節省做功課嘅時間。

寶馬 X5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 470,800 - 470,800,一共有 3 個版本,包括 1.5L 標準版(RM 86,300)、1.5L 行政版(RM 95,300)、1.5L 豪華版(RM 103,300) 等。
賓士 GLC 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 336,888 - 336,888,一共有 2 個版本,包括 GLC 200(RM 290,000)、GLC 300(RM 340,000) 等。
由價錢睇,賓士 GLC 嘅起步價比寶馬 X5 平咗 RM 133,912。老實講,喺呢個價位段,幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大,關鍵始終係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。

寶馬 X5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP),主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
賓士 GLC 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP),主動安全系統包括 Premium ADAS。
安全配備方面,兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過寶馬 X5 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 賓士 GLC 嘅 Premium ADAS 喺功能上有些差異,如果你比較重視主動安全嘅話,可以仔細對比下兩者嘅功能列表。

寶馬 X5 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
賓士 GLC 車身長 4400 mm,後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣,車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車,日常使用完全夠用。
寶馬 X5 保修 5 年/無限里程,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
賓士 GLC 保修 3 年/100,000km,保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講,寶馬 X5 同 賓士 GLC 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛,關鍵始終係睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課,多比較幾間車行嘅報價,先至去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事,花啲時間做功課絕對唔會錯。

兄弟姐妹們,今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車,係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號,文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事:計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係:西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話,喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下,呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣,馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App,就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣,分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期,仲係有分別嘅。運營初期,車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員,終究係剛上線,穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司,你可能聽過,也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下:2017 年成立,一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里,一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃,佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務,全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地,目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局,仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅,中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回,但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合,定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一,人口多、出行需求大,當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根,對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講,引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講,以後打車可能更平。

車型概覽

領克05 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講版本取捨,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
領克05 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2023 2.0T 兩驅版(價格待確認)、2023 2.0T 四驅版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 領克05 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
渦輪增壓、4 個 汽缸、1969 mL 排量 嘅動力底子,重點係市區跟車夠唔夠順、高速巡航會唔會吃力。 254 Ps / 187 kW / 265 Ps / 195 kW、350/380 N·m 嘅輸出,對滿載、上斜同超車都比單睇馬力數字更有意思。 車長 4592/4614 mm、車闊 1879 mm、車高 1628 mm、軸距 2734 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。 手自一體(AT)、前置前駆 / 前置四駆 會影響起步順滑度、濕地穩定感同長途巡航性格。
優缺點分析
領克05 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度、售價未清晰前唔應該太早用性價比落結論。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 領克05 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「領克 Lynk & Co 05 係指邊款?」簡單講,領克 Lynk & Co 05 係指 900 旗艦級豪華 5 座 SUV。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 領克05 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 領克05 唔係買車一刻就完結,之後仲有保險、輪胎、保養、泊車同日常能源成本要處理。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。

In May, China's automotive market overall presented a gentle recovery trend, with domestic brands still being the sales backbone of the market. Recently, BYD, Geely, Chery, Changan, and Great Wall, the top 5 domestic automakers, successively released their monthly performance reports. From the data, these five companies show a general characteristic of "stable total growth, divergence between domestic and international markets, and accelerated new energy penetration". Overseas exports and new energy vehicles have become the most core growth engines; export business has evolved from a "bonus item" to the "core foundation" for some companies. BYD's "dominant leader" status is further consolidated, Chery achieved high growth via exports, Geely's new energy penetration rate broke 56%, Changan focused steadily on balanced development, while Great Wall appeared slightly under pressure during structural transformation.
BYD: Export Hits New High Becomes Biggest HighlightIn May, BYD stood firmly at the top of domestic brands with a monthly sales volume of 383,500 vehicles, maintaining positive growth both year-on-year and month-over-month under a large base. Its two main brands, Dynasty and Ocean, sold a combined 330,200 vehicles, contributing 86.1% of total sales; Fangchengbao's monthly sales broke 30,000 units to reach 30,200, a year-on-year increase of 139.7%, setting a new high for the year; Denza sold 16,300 vehicles, and Yangwang delivered 286 vehicles. From a model perspective, BYD had eight models in May with monthly sales exceeding 20,000 vehicles. The Song Family and Yuan Family both broke 50,000 units, selling 51,370 and 56,691 vehicles respectively. The Sea Lion Family followed closely with 42,615 vehicles, and Seagull sales were also close to 40,000 vehicles.

BYD's biggest highlight in May was exports. Overseas new energy vehicle sales reached 160,600 units, an 80.4% year-on-year increase, accounting for about 42%. The sharp expansion of export scale effectively countered the phased weakness in domestic demand. Cumulative exports from January to May exceeded 620,000 vehicles. High export growth mainly benefited from continued ramping up of overseas factory capacity, improved ocean shipping capacity, and accelerated channel network expansion. In the domestic market, BYD promoted Megawatt Super Charging and intelligent strategies simultaneously—Megawatt charging achieved about 90% charge in 9 minutes; 20,000 super charging stations are planned to be built by 2026; all series models are available with Sky Eye B intelligent driving solutions and city navigation safety fallback plans, accelerating the popularization of high-level intelligent driving. As Gen 2 Blade Battery capacity gradually releases, the company's orders are expected to continue rising.
Chery: Sales Growth Leads the Top 5Chery Group's total sales volume in May was 247,800 vehicles, a significant year-on-year increase of 20.5%, ranking first in growth speed among the top 5. Exports remained its most core growth engine—May exports reached 181,900 vehicles, an 80.5% year-on-year increase, accounting for 73.4% of total sales that month, continuously breaking the single-month export record for Chinese brands for three months. In terms of new energy, Chery New Energy sold 100,300 vehicles, a 58.8% year-on-year increase. April and May consecutively saw monthly new energy sales breaking 100,000 vehicles.

The strong performance in exports benefited from Chery's long-term deep cultivation of overseas channel advantages and localized operation capabilities. While overseas orders continued to rise, high export growth formed a sharp contrast with domestic sales—Chery's domestic sales in May were only 60,000 vehicles, accounting for one-quarter of total sales. From cumulative data, Chery Group accumulated 1.101 million sales from January to May, but against the annual goal of 3.2 million vehicles, monthly averages need to reach about 420,000 vehicles later, and pressure remains significant.
Geely: New Energy Penetration Rate Breaks 56%Geely Auto's total sales volume in May was 237,600 vehicles, a 1% year-on-year increase, achieving month-over-month double growth for three consecutive months. In terms of structure, Geely's "New Four Transformations" transformation showed significant results: new energy vehicle sales reached 133,400 units, accounting for 56% of total sales, with new energy share exceeding 50% for four consecutive months.

From sub-brands, performance was significantly divergent. Zeekr brand sales in May reached 34,400 vehicles, a 82% year-on-year increase; Zeekr 9 Series and 8 Series models combined sales approached 50% of total sales, showing bright performance in the high-end market; Galaxy brand sales were 81,700 vehicles; Geely brand sales were 182,500 vehicles, among which China Star Series sales reached 100,800 vehicles; Lynk & Co brand sales were 20,700 vehicles, with new energy vehicle sales share rising to 71%.
In terms of exports, Geely's overseas vehicle exports in May reached 85,100 vehicles, a explosive 184% year-on-year increase, setting a brand single-month export record high. Among exported products, new energy vehicles reached 40,800 units, accounting for nearly half; hybrid and pure electric products have successively landed in Southeast Asia, Middle East, Latin America, and other markets, highlighting the results of global strategy implementation.
Changan: Multi-brand Matrix Balanced EffortChangan Auto's delivery volume in May was 209,100 vehicles, among which new energy deliveries were 92,400 vehicles, a 5.8% year-on-year increase, with new energy share about 44%. In terms of exports, overseas deliveries reached 70,700 vehicles, a 38% year-on-year increase, becoming another major growth highlight for Changan in May.
In the sub-brand matrix, Changan Qiyuan delivered 34,500 vehicles in May; All-New Q05 delivered 15,800 units, with orders breaking 3,000 units within three days of listing in Thailand; Deepal sales in May were 33,200 vehicles, a 30% year-on-year increase; January to May overseas cumulative sales were 28,700 vehicles, a significant 167% year-on-year increase; Avatr delivered 7,336 vehicles in May; Changan Auto (Gravity) delivered nearly 49,000 vehicles in May.

Changan Auto's balanced layout was fully reflected in May: the fuel car base remained stable, new energy brands Deepal and Qiyuan accelerated volume growth, high-end brand Avatr continued to break through in technical cooperation, and overseas markets simultaneously achieved breakthrough growth. The pattern of five brands working together, driven by both new energy and exports, is initially taking shape.
Great Wall: Overseas Sales Growth Year-on-Year 46.75%Great Wall Motor's sales in May were 100,400 vehicles, slightly down compared to last May's 102,200 vehicles, making it the only company among the top 5 to show a year-on-year negative growth. From sub-brands, Haval brand sales in May were 55,500 vehicles, remaining Great Wall's most important sales pillar; Tank brand sales were 17,100 vehicles; both Haval and Tank brand sales showed year-on-year declines; Wey brand sold 8,119 vehicles, a 31.78% year-on-year increase, achieving growth against the trend; Ora brand performance was most stunning, with sales of 6,018 vehicles, a significant 206.88% year-on-year increase. In terms of new energy, Great Wall sold 30,400 new energy vehicles in May, with new energy vehicle transformation gradually accelerating.

The overseas market became Great Wall's biggest highlight in May, with overseas sales growing 46.75% year-on-year. Against the background of pressure on the domestic market, strong growth in overseas business effectively made up for the decline in the domestic market. Great Wall Motor's current core contradiction lies in: Haval and Tank, the two traditional main-selling brands, face weak growth, while Wey and Ora brands, although growing notably, have relatively small volume and are not yet enough to support overall growth. How to complete the "relay" between old and new brands is the key issue Great Wall must solve subsequently.
Final ThoughtsFrom May data, the growth pattern of the top 5 domestic brands has clearly diverged, but there are three common trends worth noting: First, exports have become a key engine for domestic brands to seek stability and growth. Second, new energy transformation is still accelerating, but paths differ among enterprises. Third, technological innovation continues to deepen brand moats. Looking ahead to the second half of the year, competition in the automotive industry will continue to upgrade around these three trends. Although everyone has a common direction, these three trends are all competing for the entire enterprise's industrial chain strength, and the strong will remain strong, which has almost become an inevitable outcome.

車型概覽

上汽大通大拿M1 值唔值得睇,第一步唔係望牌子或者外形,而係睇佢能唔能夠配合你嘅香港日常。 呢篇會集中講續航、電池同補電安排,幫你用買家角度篩走唔適合嘅選擇。
售價仍待確認,買家可以先把佢放入候選名單,等價格落實後再同同級車逐項比較。
購車價格指南
上汽大通大拿M1 目前售價仍未清晰,較理性嘅做法係先睇版本、車身大小同動力形式,等價格落實後再決定值唔值得落訂。
如果有幾個版本可揀,可以先將 2024 405km 前驅版(價格待確認)、2025 403km 長軸低頂版(價格待確認)、2025 405km 長軸低頂版(價格待確認) 放喺同一張清單。日常通勤重視舒適同易用,家庭買家就要優先睇後排、尾箱同安全配置。
核心規格重點

睇 上汽大通大拿M1 嘅規格,重點唔係背數字,而係理解佢喺香港用車場景會帶嚟咩分別。
64/62 kWh 嘅電池容量,真正意義係可以幫你估算一星期通勤同周末出車要唔要中途補電。 405/403 km 嘅續航參考,對住喺新界、九龍同港島之間跨區行車嘅用家會更實際。 120 kW、240 N·m 嘅輸出,令高速併線同短距離超車更有信心。 車長 5250 mm、車闊 1870 mm、車高 1960 mm、軸距 3450 mm 可以幫你預判商場停車場、屋苑車位同後排腿部空間。
優缺點分析
上汽大通大拿M1 嘅優點唔需要講到天花龍鳳,真正有價值係佢能唔能夠令日常用車更省心:電池同續航資訊有助安排通勤同補電、動力輸出對高速同上斜更有底氣、空間同車身尺寸方便家庭買家預判實用性。
要留意嘅係,要先確認屋苑、公司或常去商場嘅充電條件、香港停車場同窄路使用要留意車身闊度。呢啲唔一定係缺點,但係落訂前應該先諗清楚。
買家常見問題
買 上汽大通大拿M1 之前,真正要問嘅唔係單一規格,而係佢可唔可以融入你每日嘅生活節奏。
常見疑問係「上汽大通大拿 M1 的純電續航里程大約係幾多?」簡單講,上汽大通大拿 M1 的純電續航最高可達 300 公里,市區短途商用足夠使用。 放到實際用車,就係要睇佢對通勤、泊車、家庭乘坐同長期成本有幾大幫助。
同級對比內容
將 上汽大通大拿M1 放入同級車清單時,唔建議只用外形或者品牌光環決定。比較順序可以係:先等售價落實,再決定佢應該同邊個級距比較、再睇動力係咪足夠應付高速併線同滿載、再比較能源成本同補能便利、最後睇車身大小、座位同尾箱是否適合家人。
咁樣篩選會貼近香港買家真實生活:平日塞車、商場泊車、周末去新界、甚至一家人出入,先係一部車每日要面對嘅考驗。
用車全周期指南
擁有 上汽大通大拿M1 最重要係先諗清楚充電節奏。屋苑、公司或者常去商場只要有穩定充電選項,電動化用車就會容易相處好多。
如果你主要喺市區行,視野、低速順滑度同泊車輔助會好影響心情;如果經常行高速或跨區,座椅舒適度、隔音同動力從容感會更重要。
