首頁大洋洲
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
The global automotive market in the first half of 2026 delivered its results amidst multiple shifts: escalating geopolitical conflicts, repeated supply chain disruptions, and the electrification transition entering a critical phase. Looking at internationally mainstream automakers with announced data, the sales landscape shows significant differentiation: Japanese, German, and American traditional giants generally face pressure and decline, while some Chinese independent brands and automakers focusing on emerging markets achieve resilient growth. This structural reshuffle reflects the profound reshaping of the global automotive industry landscape.
Toyota Retains Sales Crown, Multiple Chinese Brands Reach the Top Tier
According to the official H1 2026 global sales data announced by each automaker, Toyota Motor remained the sales champion for the first half of the year, with global sales of approximately 5.39 million units, a year-over-year decrease of 2.8%. This marks the first time Toyota has seen a year-over-year decline in global H1 sales in two years. The Volkswagen Group ranked second globally with approximately 4.126 million sales, with the year-over-year decline widening to 6.3%, a gap of 1.26 million units from Toyota. The Hyundai Motor Group (combined Hyundai and Kia) had a total H1 sales of approximately 3.579 million units, overall performance relatively stable, holding the third place globally.
(Note: Some automakers have not yet announced H1 sales data)
The Stellantis Group ranked fourth with H1 sales of 2.958 million units, the only traditional giant achieving double-digit positive growth, with a year-over-year increase of 11%, demonstrating surprising resilience and elasticity. Stellantis Group H1 global sales were approximately 1.36 million units in the first quarter, a year-over-year increase of 12%; 1.597 million units in the second quarter, a year-over-year increase of 10%, mainly driven by the North American and European markets.
General Motors delivered approximately 2.721 million units in the first half of the year, a year-over-year decrease of 8.9%. However, benefiting from the high premium of North American pickups and SUVs, its sales revenue instead grew counter-trend slightly to $91.7 billion, showing the rare characteristic of "volume down, profit stable".
Notably, Chinese brands occupy three spots on the top 10 list. BYD's cumulative sales reached 1.809 million units in the first half of the year, a year-over-year decrease of 15.7%. Geely's total sales for the first half of the year were approximately 1.423 million units, including brands such as Geely, Lynk & Co, and Zeekr, a slight year-over-year increase of 1%, with new energy product penetration reaching 56%. During the same period, Chery Group's total sales for the first half of the year reached 1.358 million units, a year-over-year increase of 7.7%, setting a new historical high. Among them, June single-month sales were 256,612 units, a year-over-year increase of 9.8%.
Japanese automaker Suzuki's total sales for the first half of the year were 1.8 million units, a significant year-over-year increase of 110.3%. The company saw sales growth in markets such as India, Indonesia, Pakistan, and Africa, driving its overseas H1 sales to a new record. Nissan's sales for the first half of the year were 1.506 million units, a year-over-year decrease of 6.7%, continuing the sluggish trend of recent years.
Traditional Giants Lose Speed: Loss of China Market Resonates with Middle East Geopolitical Impact
In traditional automakers where performance declined, the sluggish sales in the China market, the spillover effects of Middle East geopolitical conflicts, US tariffs, and the retreat of electric vehicle policies, together formed the "headwinds" suppressing their global performance.
An announcement issued by Toyota Motor at the end of July stated that due to weakening demand in the Chinese market and the drag from model replacement adjustments of the popular model RAV4, the company's global production and sales in the first half of the year saw a decline. From January to June this year, Toyota's sales in the Chinese market plummeted by 17.1%, offsetting demand growth in the North American and Japanese markets. In the announcement, the Toyota Group stated: "North American and Japanese market demand is stable, demand for hybrid models and other models in the North American market remains strong, but was offset by the decline in sales in the Chinese market."
Image Source: Toyota Motor
Geopolitical conflict combined with fierce competition in the Chinese market has begun to impact the profit records set by Toyota in the previous fiscal year. In June this year, sales of Toyota and Lexus brands in the Middle East region decreased by 24% year-over-year, while sales in the Chinese market decreased by 27% year-over-year. At the performance conference in May this year, Toyota stated that the automaker exports approximately 500,000 to 600,000 vehicles to the Middle East annually, and the company estimates that nearly half of the export volume could be impacted by the situation in the Middle East.
However, Toyota also adjusted the combined sales forecast for automobiles upwards by 100,000 units from the previous forecast, to 9.7 million units, a figure higher than the previous fiscal year's total sales of 9.595 million units. Toyota stated that the upward adjustment originated from strong demand in North American and European markets, while alternative logistics channels to the Middle East were completed, driving a recovery in local sales.
Volkswagen Group's performance pressure in the first half of the year was also highly concentrated in the Asia-Pacific market, where the decline in the Chinese market was particularly obvious. Volkswagen delivered 24% less in the Asia-Pacific market in the first half of the year, and deliveries in the Chinese market decreased by 25.9% year-over-year. From the perspective of sub-sectors, the downward trend of pure electric models is particularly significant: from January to June this year, Volkswagen Group's deliveries of pure electric models in China plummeted by 47.9%. Volkswagen also had a difficult situation in the North American market in the first half of the year, with pure electric business performance particularly pronounced. In the first half of the year, the group's sales of pure electric models in North America fell sharply by 68.8%, plummeting from 31,300 units in the same period last year to only 9,800 units in the first half of the year.
General Motors' global deliveries for the first half of the year decreased by 8.9%, but supported by stable prices and strong demand for pickups and SUVs, global sales revenue still climbed slightly, demonstrating the profit moat of the North American market. However, General Motors' performance in the Chinese market was also not optimistic, as its joint venture brands face all-round siege from Chinese local brands.
Chinese Brands: From Domestic Fierce Competition to Global Offense
Represented by automakers such as BYD, Geely, and Chery, Chinese automakers ranked high on the global sales list in the first half of the year, showing an unprecedented scale presence for Chinese brands. These three automakers supported overall sales with explosive growth in overseas markets. The core engine of these brands' growth has shifted from domestic to overseas, and the globalization of Chinese automakers is changing from slogans to reality.
Image Source: BYD
Although BYD's total sales declined in the first half of the year, its structural highlight lies in the continuous breakthrough in overseas markets — cumulative overseas sales of passenger cars and pickups reached 789,000 units, a year-over-year increase of 68%, and the proportion of overseas sales to total sales has exceeded 43%. This means BYD has transformed from a "Chinese new energy giant" into a true "global new energy automaker".
BYD's export destinations in the first half of the year showed a layout characteristic of "Latin America leading, Europe breaking out at multiple points, Oceania, Southeast Asia, and Middle East differentiated expansion". Brazil continues to firmly occupy the position of this automaker's largest overseas market, and the top five countries in Europe also rank in the top ten of BYD's export destinations.
Geely's total sales for the first half of the year were approximately 1.423 million units, with outstanding overseas export performance, cumulative exports of 474,228 units, a year-over-year increase of 158%, a figure that has already exceeded the total export volume for the full year of 2025. June single-month exports were 102,874 units, a year-over-year increase of 157%, a month-on-month increase of 21%, achieving year-over-year and month-on-month double growth for six consecutive months, marking that Geely's export business has entered the stage of scale release. Geely's new energy product export sales in the first half of the year were 277,189 units, a surge of 585% year-over-year, with new energy proportion reaching 59%.
As a leader of Chinese brands going global, Chery Automobile accumulated 943,817 exports in the first half of the year, a year-over-year increase of 71.5%, with export proportion approaching 70%, making it a Chinese brand with high degree of internationalization. In July, Chery's exports of automobiles were 202,533 units, a year-over-year increase of 70.1%, breaking the record for Chinese car single-month exports for five consecutive months, becoming the first Chinese automaker to break through 200,000 exports in a single month.
Summary:
In the second half of the year, the global automotive industry will still move forward heavily burdened: weak demand, continuous heating of trade protection, cost increases brought by Middle East turmoil, and logistics and supply chain disruptions, transnational automakers will continue to promote cost reduction, production capacity contraction, and adjustment of electrification pace. These factors will also lead to the global car market still being full of high uncertainty. But a clear trend has been established: with the rise of Chinese automakers, the global automotive industry is accelerating from "Triopoly of Japan, Germany, and America" to "Multipolar Competition".
Recently, Chery Fengyun T7 officially started pre-sale, with three versions having a pre-sale guide price of 109,900-129,900 RMB, simultaneously launching 7 sets of purchase benefits. Among them, the "dual safety net" of power battery thermal runaway compensation for a new car and up to 5 million compensation for autonomous driving accidents, combined with the "dual lifetime" policy of whole-vehicle lifetime warranty and lifetime basic maintenance, directly hit the core concerns of users regarding vehicle use, and also made this pure electric SUV focusing on global quality generate maximum buzz upon its debut.
100,000-130,000 RMB level pure electric SUV is the most fierce competitive price range in the current domestic new energy vehicle market, also the interval where user pain points are most concentrated. In the past, many models either used low range versions to lower the starting price, wanting long range means adding money for high spec; or shrank in safety quality and after-sales benefits, holding the idea of "fast-making cars" for quick iteration, but compromised long-term reliability. Fengyun T7's entry took a completely different path: relying on Chery's 23 years of global technology accumulation, first going through extreme trials in multiple global regions, then returning to the domestic market with global standards. This "reverse overseas tempering" tactic brought new variables to the intense competition in the entry pure electric market.
First to break is the price threshold for long range. In the past, same-price models generally placed 600km level range on high spec versions, starting price often needed above 130,000, low spec models mostly 400-500km range. If users wanted to say goodbye to range anxiety, they had to pay higher cost. Fengyun T7 directly achieved range configuration equality across all trims. The three models all standard equipped with 65.05kWh Rhino battery, CLTC range 600km, actual tested range even exceeded 667km, achieving "reverse exaggeration".
For daily commuting users, 600km range is enough to support one charge per week, no need to frequently go back and forth to charging stations; during long-distance travel, 30%-80% fast charging only takes 20 minutes, recharging efficiency is enough to match the rhythm of mid-journey rest. With dual-source wide heat pump air conditioning, the vehicle can operate stably in a wide temperature range from -30℃ to 55℃. Pain points of range reduction in northern winters and battery degradation in southern high temperatures are alleviated, truly making long range no longer exclusive to high specs.
Second is the dimensional reduction of safety quality, bringing global-level standards down to the 100,000 RMB price level. Many users worry most about battery safety and body rigidity when choosing low-price pure electric cars. Fengyun T7 is designed against the 2026 E-NCAP five-star safety standard. The body uses 80% high-strength steel and 18.84% hot-formed steel to build a cage structure, combined with 9 airbags, basic passive protection maxed out. Rhino battery is protected by 6D protection system against extrusion and puncture impact, IP68 waterproofing capability reaches 96 times national standard, summer heavy rain wading and road water accumulation can be handled with more peace of mind.
Different from many models that only meet standards in the laboratory, Fengyun T7 invested 81 dedicated durability vehicles for synchronized road testing. Whole vehicle cumulative test mileage exceeded 6 million kilometers, conducted real vehicle validation for Southeast Asia rainy season, Middle East high temperatures, Indonesia high humidity and other global extreme environments. Equivalent to using rigorous quality standards for export overseas on a 100,000 RMB SUV aimed at ordinary families. Such quality standards are not common among same-price models.
Coming down to daily use scenarios, Fengyun T7's practicality is also powerful enough. In terms of intelligence, integrated cockpit-drive 8775 chip guaranteed infotainment system response speed. 15.6-inch high-definition screen supports mainstream mobile phone wireless connectivity, seamless navigation and music connection upon boarding. Falcon 500 driver assistance system supports 300+ full-scenario automatic parking. Dead-end parking, multi-level parking can be realized, especially friendly to narrow parking spots and complex parking lots in cities. New drivers can also easily achieve parking freedom.
Space and comfort precisely fit family user needs. 2700mm wheelbase brings same-level leading rear legroom, pure flat floor allows middle passengers to also sit comfortably. Rear seats folded down can expand to 1955mm pure flat space, trunk capacity of regular 450L, maximum 1550L, can easily accommodate daily grocery shopping and baby pickup, weekend camping gear. 9-layer cloud-sensation seats support ventilation heating, plus chassis tuned by international team, daily commuting vibration damping is gentle, long-distance travel not easy to get tired.
From market competitiveness perspective, Fengyun T7 plays a combination of "global quality + national price + full-cycle benefits". At the price end, 109,900 starting price配上 full-range 600km range, is already more sincere than most same-price models; at the quality end, Chery's 20+ years of global car building experience and full-link rigorous testing grounded product long-term reliability; most differentiated is benefit policy, dual safety net directly eliminated user concerns about battery safety and autonomous driving responsibility, dual lifetime benefits pressed long-term vehicle use cost to extremely low.
Comparing many same-price models that only provide basic triple powertrain warranty and after-sales boundaries are blurred, Fengyun T7 is equivalent to transferring more vehicle use risk to the brand end. This confidence comes both from confidence in own product quality, also grasped ordinary family user core demand of "buying car with confidence, using car saving money".
Placed in the entire industry, the appearance of Fengyun T7 is actually re-organizing the value logic of 100,000 RMB pure electric SUVs. For a long time, 100,000 RMB electric cars were default as "short-distance commuter tools", not worthy of talking quality or service. Fengyun T7 insists on breaking this stereotype: using global standards as basic quality, using configuration equality to care for entry users, using safety net benefits to solve vehicle use anxiety, putting experiences and services that only existed in past mid-to-high-end models down to national price level.
In the current industry pursuit of fast iteration, fighting price wars, Chery chooses to use slow work to polish a global car. This long-term car building idea just hits the real needs of family users. Compared to flashy gimmick functions, they need more a reliable, durable, worry-free family car.
In general, Fengyun T7's pre-sale brought new value references to 100,000-130,000 RMB pure electric SUV market. It did not use low range low spec cars to draw traffic playing word games, nor did it rely on piling up flashy concepts to grab eyeballs, but truly gave users long range, high safety, full-cycle guarantees. For consumers, budget of 100,000+ to buy quality verified by global market, undoubtedly added one high cost-performance choice. For industry, Fengyun T7 will also force same-price competitors to re-examine products and services, no longer only rely on low price to attract attention, but return to the essence of family cars. As for how much market recognition this sincerity can exchange, will need to see after launch, but at least from pre-sale posture, it has precisely hit user real pain points.
8 月 12 日，奇瑞風雲 T7 正式開啟預售。這場以「慢功造好車，久等了」為主題嘅發布會，喺這個新車平均每日上市超過 3 款嘅時代，顯得有點「不合時宜」。
但正正呢份「不合時宜」，恰恰擊中咗當下新能源汽車行業最敏感嘅神經。
「速成」嘅喧囂與「慢功」嘅稀缺
數據顯示，2026 年 7 月，新能源汽車月度新車銷量佔比首次突破 60%。行業競爭從價格博弈全面轉向價值競爭。然而，速度嘅另一面係隱憂。業內高管公開批評部分品牌為加快上市節奏刪減必要測試環節，讓消費者變相擔當試車員。全國汽車標準化技術委員會已就三項新能源汽車定型試驗規程公開徵求意見，擬將新能源車型可靠性行駛試驗總里程提升至 3 萬公里。
「速成車」嘅病根在於扭曲嘅競爭邏輯——部分企業陷入「唯快論」，怕慢咗半步就錯失賽道，怕遲咗幾日就丟掉流量。但汽車唔係快消品。正正喺呢個背景下，奇瑞用風雲 T7 給咗另一個答案。
五年磨一劍：一輛「先出海、再歸國」嘅全球車
風雲 T7 並唔係內地特供車型。佢嘅同源車型 Lepas L6 已率先喺南非開啟預售、喺泰國上市，後續仲會登入歐盟、澳新、英國、以色列、馬來等多個市場。先接受全球市場檢驗，再落地內地發售——呢套反向輸入嘅產品節奏，喺本土車企中並唔多見。
呢背後係奇瑞連續 23 年位居中國品牌乘用車出口前列、全球用戶突破 2000 萬、產品銷往 130 多個海外市場嘅深厚積澱。2026 年上半年，中國汽車出口 509.6 萬輛，奇瑞以 94.38 萬輛嘅出口量獨佔鰲頭。風雲 T7 唔係一輛先喺內地造好、再想辦法賣到國外嘅車，而係一輛由一早就按照全球標準研發、喺全球跑咗完驗證、帶著海外市場嘅真實反饋先返嚟內地嘅產品。
2 年策劃，3 年研發。放喺今日呢個「12 個月出一款新車」嘅行業節奏入面，呢個周期幾乎顯得不合時宜。但正正係呢 5 年嘅慢，令風雲 T7 喺好多維度上做出咗差異化。
安全層面，佢按照 2026 版 E-NCAP 五星安全標準開發。2026 版 E-NCAP 將整車安全拆解為安全駕駛、碰撞規避、碰撞保護同碰撞後安全四大支柱。風雲 T7 由研發階段就錨定呢個標準，仲做到咗功能安全 ASILD 最高等級。呢唔係簡單嘅「堆料」，而係把安全標準前置咗去產品定義階段。
環境適應性上，風雲 T7 嘅全域適配區間覆蓋 -40℃到 55℃。為此佢搭載咗同級首发嘅雙源寬溫域熱泵加 PTC 系統；喺熱帶高濕地區，空調濾芯做咗針對性優化；喺中東區域配備 4.5L 大容量清洗液罐；喺巴西沙石路增設電池前後樑防護。呢啲細節反映咗一種「為全球用戶造車」嘅思維方式——先理解唔同環境嘅需求再開始造車。
驗證環節更能說明問題。風雲 T7 同步投入 81 台專屬耐久車進行路試，整車累計測試里程超 600 萬公里，耐久專項實測 145 萬公里。覆蓋歐盟、澳新、中東、南非、俄羅斯、墨西哥、巴西等 100 多個極限路況環境。
全系 600 公里續航平權：打破分級溢價
風雲 T7 做咗一個反常規嘅決策——所有配置版本統一搭載 65.05kWh 犀牛電池，CLTC 續航全部鎖定 600 公里。入門車型唔砍續航，高配版本唔加價換續航，直接打破行業通行嘅分級溢價邏輯。官方實測續航可達 667 公里，30%-80% 快充只需 22 分鐘。
犀牛電池提前通過 2026 版新國標認證，循環壽命超 2500 次。按家用车年均行駛兩萬公里計算，整車 15 年無需更換電池。奇瑞同步給予三項兜底承諾：全系列滿足最新國標、電池熱失控損毀賠償同款新車、首任非營運車主三電終身保養。
安全滿配：同級頂配安全配置全系標配
風雲 T7 採用 80% 高強度鋼車身加 18.84% 熱成型鋼，九橫五縱籠式車身結構。同級最多 9 個安全氣囊，含 48L 最大體積雙腔遠端氣囊、1778mm 最長側氣簾、6s 長效保壓技術。犀牛電池 6D 鎖子甲 31 層防護，IP68 防水達國標 96 倍，側邊抗擠壓達國標 2 倍。完成正柱碰、側柱碰、偏置碰撞、40km/h 鑽卡、MCB 碰撞煞停等極限安全測試。
智能與舒享：艙駕一體，移動大平層
智能方面，風雲 T7 同級首发 4nm 製程 8775 艙駕一體芯片，NPU 算力 72TOPS，搭載 15.6 英寸 2.5K 防眩光大屏與靈犀智艙 2.0×豆包大模型。獵鷹 500 智駕配備 22 顆高精度傳感器，支援 200 多種場景自動泊車、高速領航輔助。
空間方面，車身 4570×1852×1694mm，軸距 2700mm，車內得房率 84%。9 層複合雲感座椅，同級最大純平大床模式 1955mm×1310mm，後備廂常規 450L、最大拓展 1550L。
全球品質，國民價格
風雲 T7 此次預售推出 3 款配置車型，預售價為 10.99-12.99 萬元。即日起至上市，支付 1000 元訂金可享受 7 重禮包權益。
風雲 T7 補全咗風雲序列插混、增程、純電三條技術路線嘅最後一塊版圖。對奇瑞而言，佢嘅意義唔止一款走量車型——過去奇瑞靠出口賺全球市場嘅錢，如今把全球驗證嘅成熟產品帶返內地，用長期投入攢下嘅體系能力打家用市場。
慢係慢咗啲，但每一步都踩實處。喺呢個被「速成」裹挾嘅時代，奇瑞用一輛風雲 T7 告訴市場：有些事快唔到，有些路繞唔過。
中國汽車正邁向全球市場，向高質量發展轉型。真正嘅核心競爭力，從來唔靠搶先一步嘅噱頭，而係經得起時間、路況、複雜工況檢驗嘅產品實力。風雲 T7 嘅「慢功」，或許正係呢個行業最需要嘅清醒。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Proton X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，一共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
Subaru Crosstrek 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 145,000 - 160,000，一共有 1 個版本，包括 2.0L e-Boxer（RM 150,000） 等。
從價錢來看，Proton X70 嘅起步價確實比 Subaru Crosstrek 平咗 RM 38,200。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取捨，具體要睇返你嘅需求。
Proton X70 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
Subaru Crosstrek 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
兩款車用緊同一套動力系統，日常開嚟嘅感覺基本冇乜分別。油耗方面都差唔多，唔使太糾結呢一點。
Proton X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
Subaru Crosstrek 嘅安全評級係 5★ (Euro NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 EyeSight。
安全配備方面，兩款車都拿到唔錯嘅評級。不過 Proton X70 嘅 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) 同 Subaru Crosstrek 嘅 EyeSight 喺功能上有些差異，如果你比較看重主動安全嘅話，可以仔細對比一下兩者嘅功能列表。
Proton X70 保養 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Subaru Crosstrek 保養 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，Proton X70 同 Subaru Crosstrek 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇返你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試車做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
國內汽車市場競爭日趨內捲，車企盈利空間持續承壓，開拓海外市場已經從可選佈局轉變為生存發展嘅必經之路。最新行業數據顯示，2026 年上半年我國汽車出口迎來爆發式增長，出口量、出口總額雙雙創新高，但海外貿易壁壘持續增多，本土化生產成為車企突圍核心方案。
根據中汽協相關統計，2026 年 6 月國內汽車出口 104 萬輛，同比上漲 75%，首次實現單月出口破百萬。上半年汽車累計出口 510 萬輛，同比增長 65%，半年出口量首次突破 500 萬輛；整車出口金額折合人民幣超 6000 億元。如今汽車出口佔國內總銷量比重提升至 35%。對比國內微薄利潤，海外市場擁有更高毛利率，眾多車企依靠海外盈利反哺國內業務，對沖本土低價競爭帶來嘅盈利壓力。
上半年各大車企海外銷量梯隊清晰。奇瑞以 93.9 萬輛出口量位居首位，海外銷量佔總銷量 74%；比亞迪 79.2 萬輛緊隨其後，海外工廠本地化生產能夠有效提升單車利潤；上汽、吉利分別位列第三、四名。其中吉利新能源出口增長迅猛，新能源車佔到其出口總量六成。長安、長城同樣保持穩定海外輸出。各大車企持續加碼海外產能建設，透過海外建廠鞏固市場份額，應對持續變化嘅海外政策環境。
亮眼出口成績背後，外部挑戰接踵而至。歐盟對中國電動車徵收反補貼稅，還計劃將限制範圍延伸至插混車型，同時推出相關法案抬高外資投資門檻。巴西上調進口電動車關稅，泰國推行產能對賭政策，多重規則大幅抬高整車直接出口成本。單純依靠整車出口嘅模式風險越來越高。
加速本土化建廠，車企探寻破局之路面對貿易壁壘，國內車企選擇加速海外本地化生產，形成兩種發展途徑。奇瑞採用反向合資模式，藉助本土品牌獲取生產資質，降低市場抵觸；比亞迪選擇全資自建工廠，完整掌控供應鏈與生產環節。不少企業緊抓窗口期收購歐洲工廠，規避政策限制。
、中國汽車出海迎來高速增長週期，但前路挑戰長期存在。海外市場既是增量藍海，也是博弈賽場。各大車企持續完善海外產業佈局，依靠本土化生產化解貿易阻礙。未來，誰能更好扎根海外市場、平衡政策與經營，有望在全球汽車競爭中搶佔更多席位。
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross when choosing a car. The price and positioning of these two cars are quite close. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Proton X50 OTR price in Malaysia is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are 4 versions in total, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Toyota Yaris Cross OTR price in Malaysia is RM 99,900 - 109,900, there are 2 versions in total, including 2026 1.5L Standard (RM 99,900), 2026 HEV 1.5L Standard (RM 109,900), etc.
From a price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 10,100 cheaper than Toyota Yaris Cross. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note that the few thousand cheaper amount might involve trade-offs in features; it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Toyota Yaris Cross is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, horsepower 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience in daily use is basically no different. Fuel consumption is also similar, so there is no need to worry too much about this.
Proton X50 vehicle length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Toyota Yaris Cross vehicle length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of the two cars are almost identical, and there is not much difference in interior space. For cars in this class, it is fully sufficient for daily use.
Proton X50 uses 4WD drivetrain.
Toyota Yaris Cross uses FWD drivetrain.
Proton's 4WD and Toyota's FWD will have different handling sensations; a test drive comparison is recommended.
Proton X50 warranty 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Toyota Yaris Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, Proton X50 and Toyota Yaris Cross are both quite good models in the Malaysia market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. We suggest doing thorough research, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then go for a test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big matter; spending time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會用 Perodua Aruz 同 Honda WR-V 去做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
Perodua Aruz 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 72,900 - 77,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L X（RM 72,900）、1.5L AV（RM 77,900） 等。
Honda WR-V 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,900 - 107,900，一共有 4 個版本，包括 2023 1.5L V（RM 99,900）、2023 1.5L E（RM 95,900）、2023 1.5L S（RM 89,900） 等。
睇返個價錢，Perodua Aruz 嘅起跳價確實係比 Honda WR-V 平咗 RM 17,000。如果你預算有限，Perodua 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。但亦都要留意，平咗嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能在配備上會有取捨，具體要看你嘅需求。
Perodua Aruz 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
Honda WR-V 嘅安全评分係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 Honda SENSING。
呢兩架車嘅安全评分一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算係好齊全嘅。而家嘅新車安全性都唔差，唔使太擔心呢一點。
Perodua Aruz 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Honda WR-V 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
呢兩架車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感覺唔會有太大分別。
Perodua Aruz 保養保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Honda WR-V 保養保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總括嚟講，Perodua Aruz 同 Honda WR-V 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊架，關鍵都係要看你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最後決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對無錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X50 同名爵 MG HS 嚟比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你慳返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，一共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300） 等。
名爵 MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，一共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
睇落價錢，寶騰 X50 嘅起步價確實比名爵 MG HS 平咗 RM 40,650。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經滿足日常需要。但係要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上有取捨，具體睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X50 裝載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
名爵 MG HS 裝載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，名爵 MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比寶騰 X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
寶騰 X50 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
名爵 MG HS 車身長 4400 mm，行李廂 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間冇咩分別。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
名爵 MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
寶騰嘅 4WD 同名爵嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同感覺，建議試駕比較。
寶騰 X50 同名爵 MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更重視品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配備更豐富嗰款。始終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，寶騰 X50 同名爵 MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊輛，關鍵依然係要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
7月1日，吉利汽车控股有限公司（0175.HK）公布最新销量数据：1-6月累计销量1,422,958辆，创同期新高。其中，6月销量240,799辆，连续4个月同环比双增长。
新能源方面，上半年新能源（含吉利、领克、极氪）累计销量799,454辆，同比增长10%，其中，6月销量161,449辆，同比增长32%，环比增长21%，新能源销量占比67%。海外出口销量大涨，再创单月新高。6月海外出口达102,874辆，同比增长157%，环比增长21%，连续六个月实现同环比双增长。1-6月海外出口销量474,228辆，超过2025年全年出口销量，其中，新能源产品出口销量277,189辆，同比劲增585%，6月新能源出口销量占比达61%。下半年，吉利汽车全面提速。极氪9X将于三季度正式出海，首站登陆中东地区，未来将进入欧洲、拉美、中亚等全球主要市场；极氪009光辉将于四季度登陆中国香港；极氪8X千里浩瀚G-ASD H9版型即将开启交付；全新车型吉利银河战舰700和吉利银河TT官图已曝光，上市计划持续稳步推进中。
唔知有幾多朋友最近期關注 10 萬內純電 SUV 市場？近段時間睇嚟，呢個細分市場好熱鬧。就講長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10，上個月銷量分別達 15814 輛同 14372 輛，全部挺進 2026 年 4 月銷量排行全品類前 10，長安啟源全新 Q05 甚至奪得緊緊湊型純電 SUV 市場嘅銷冠。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
值得留意係，兩款大熱門產品亮點亦唔少，9 萬級可以得到 500km+嘅續航，零跑 A10 甚至配備激光雷達，有高級智駕輔助需求嘅朋友嚟講，呢架車吸引力的確唔低。但係喺價格上，同為高配嘅長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 同零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版，終端價格分別係 9.59 萬同 8.68 萬，手握 9 萬左右預算嘅朋友都可以考慮。明顯係，又去到決賽圈二揀一環節。
（零跑 A10）
如果對預算比較敏感，咁喺長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 之間，後者可能更受歡迎，畢竟終端價格實打實平咗幾千元。而且，高配 A10 配有激光雷達，市區/高速情況均能啟動領航輔助駕駛，呢個就係佢嘅優勢所在。當然，如果預算允許，揀長安啟源全新 Q05 高配，都有帶激光雷達嘅高級輔助駕駛。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
但既然係買車前嘅橫評，唔少全方位對比。首先從尺寸睇，作為緊湊型 SUV，長安啟源全新 Q05 長寬高分別係 4435*1855*1595mm，軸距為 2735mm。而零跑 A10 車型級別就係小型 SUV，長寬高分別係 4270*1810*1635mm，軸距為 2605mm。
（零跑 A10）
如果只係考慮代步、通勤，零跑 A10 嘅細個嘅略有優勢，方便行街串巷。但實際上，好多人買車都要兼顧家用，10 萬內預算也多以剛需用車群體為主。既然係剛需，且有家用需求，嗰空間自然唔好掉鏈子。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
講返日常家庭出行嚟講，兩車之間 130mm 軸距差異，直接反映喺後排體驗。坐入長安啟源全新 Q05 後排，腿部空間平整兼寬敞，一齊坐 3 位成年人都唔會太擠；但係坐入零跑 A10 後排，無論坐寬定係腿部空間都會細少少。媽咪喺後排照顧孩子，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排更加寬敞嘅空間會更加方便佢操作，孩子都能有更大嘅活動空間。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗空間，通勤黨同家庭用戶對舒適配置都比較關注。睇嚟對比，兩車都有配電動尾門、無匙進入、自適應遠近光等外部配置。但係從車廂內睇，零跑 A10 副駕無法電動調節，後排靠背都唔支援角度調節，同埋缺少後排空調出風口、車內 PM2.5 過濾裝置等。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
反觀長安啟源全新 Q05，除咗副駕支持電動調節，前排仲集成咗加熱/通風/按摩/副駕腿托功能，對比零跑 A10 只提供前排座椅加熱，佢嘅品質無疑更上一層樓。包括後排乘員都有少少照顧，例如靠背角度可調、配有後排空調出風口、後排中央扶手/杯架等，更加適合家人同行呢類場景。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
除咗舒享體驗，行駛系統嘅對比我哋都唔好忽略。首先從大家關注嘅續航睇，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 分別搭載 51.9kWh、53kWh 電池，CLTC 純電續航做到 506km、505km，差異大可忽略。但從電芯供應鏈睇，前者出自寧德時代，後者就係國軒高科/江蘇正力，若論品牌含金量，“寧王”順位自然靠前，更值得信賴。另外，兩車都有全球品質，按照全球嚴苛嘅標準打造，零跑 A10 符合國內、歐盟雙標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺泰國上市，未來仲會相繼落地多個國家地區，最終開拓歐洲區域，此外仲有央企背書，質量品質都好可靠。
因為本文討論嘅係 A10 嘅 505 版本，採用電池液冷技術，溫控較好，而如果係 403 版本，採用成本低嘅風冷技術，散熱效果較差。呢點上，全新 Q05 做得更好，入門就採用電池直冷技術，高配用嘅係液冷技術，能更好地實現熱管理，保證電池安全。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
動力方面，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 都係前置單電機佈局，電機最大動力輸出分別係 120kW/190N·m、90kW/150N·m，0-100km/h 加速時間分別做到 8.9 秒同 10.6 秒。坦率嚟講，兩款車喺純電陣營加速性能都中規中矩；但係相對嚟講，長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅 8 秒級零百加速，喺山路行駛、高速超車等情況下會比零跑 A10 更加分。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
總結嚟講，零跑 A10 505 激光雷達版優勢突出：價格更低、智駕輔助覆蓋範圍更廣，適合預算優先 + 科技嘗鮮嘅消費者。而長安啟源全新 Q05 更強調“全面”二字：加少少預算同樣可以獲得高級輔助駕駛，而且尺寸更大、舒適配置更高、採用頭部電芯供應鏈，動力亦更強，綜合表現更全能。總括嚟講，預算 9 萬級追求面面俱到嘅家用體驗，長安啟源全新 Q05 506Max+ 更加值得考慮。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
兄弟姐妹們，今日講一個出海嘅大新聞——唔係賣車，係賣「司機」。6 月 2 號，文遠知行同 Uber 聯合宣佈咗一件事：計劃喺西班牙馬德里推出該國首個商業化 Robotaxi 試點服務。意思就係：西班牙人好快就可以用 Uber 叫到一台冇司機嘅出租車。呢次係文遠知行同 Uber 第一次一齊進入歐洲市場。馬德里亦成為文遠知行 Robotaxi 駛入嘅全球第十二個城市。
官方消息話，喺馬德里自治區政府嘅支持下，呢項服務今年內就會正式啟動。到嗰陣，馬德里嘅朋友哋打開 Uber App，就有一鍵呼叫文遠知行嘅 Robotaxi。同叫普通網約車一樣，分別係嚟嘅車冇駕駛員——至少喺初期，仲係有分別嘅。運營初期，車入面會配備經過專業培訓嘅安全員，終究係剛上線，穩妥第一。
文遠知行呢間公司，你可能聽過，也可能冇聽過。簡單介紹下：2017 年成立，一直埋頭搞 Robotaxi 技術研發同商業化。而家佢嘅 Robotaxi 已經覆蓋咗廣州、北京、新加坡、阿布達比、迪拜、利雅得、蘇黎世……加埋而家嘅馬德里，一共 12 個城市。西班牙亦係文遠知行進入嘅第五個歐洲市場——之前已經入咗瑞士、法國、比利時、斯洛伐克。按照文遠知行同 Uber 喺 2025 年 5 月達成嘅規劃，佢哋要喺五年內新增 15 個國際城市部署 Robotaxi 服務，全球部署數萬輛 Robotaxi。隨著馬德里落地，目前已經完成咗 4 個城市嘅佈局，仲有 11 個會喺 2030 年前陸續覆蓋。
講真嘅，中國自動駕駛公司出海唔係頭一回，但中國技術 + 全球出行平台 + 歐洲市場呢個組合，定係好有意思。馬德里係歐洲最具商業潛力嘅 Robotaxi 市場之一，人口多、出行需求大，當地政策都好友善。喺呢個市場站穩腳根，對文遠知行嚟講係個唔小嘅里程碑。對 Uber 嚟講，引進 Robotaxi 都係為咗降低成本——終究司機唔使發人工。對馬德里市民嚟講，以後打車可能更平。
你睇過印度嘅馬路嗎？
我喺網上見過。
畫面通常係咁，一輛轎車俾牛尾擋住，旁邊仲有亂竄嘅摩托，甚至周圍仲有賣奶茶嘅小夥，嗰叫一個“乾淨又衛生”。
然而，喺呢啲睇完好多人覺得生理不適嘅地方，豐田、鈴木、本田等日本車廠，卻決定將籌碼押落印度。
據印度“品牌質量基金會”網站顯示，三家車廠將喺印度投資近110 億美元建廠、提產能、搞出口。
對此有网友表示，三家日本車廠係咪錢多到無處花？
事實上，佢哋唔係錢多到花唔完，亦唔係被印度嘅咖哩蒙蔽咗心竅，呢啲日本車廠高層遠比我哋清醒。
而家嘅日系車，營業額、市場份額都喺下滑，原材料成本仲係升得飛起，打開世界地圖，搵一個能夠容納產能、拓充份額、競爭溫和嘅市場，唔係咁容易嘅事。
所以，唔係日本車廠選擇咗印度，而係因為冇得揀。
日本車廠之痛
曾經嘅日系車，嗰時妥妥係人哋個仔。
你問下十幾年前開過日系車嘅老司機，一提起日系車，幾乎就冇唔豎大拇指嘅，價錢平、省油、耐用又抵撞……
甚至好多日系車，仲要加價購買，但邊個諗到，呢個鐵打嘅江山，短短幾年時間就俾佢哋打得找唔著北。
隨著新能源汽車浪潮嚟到，電動化、智能化變成好多自主車廠“彎道超車”嘅目標，依托於中國強大嘅新能源汽車產業鏈優勢同車廠自身對研發、技術嘅堅持，中國自主品牌迅速實現咗“彎道超車”。
曾經被人吐槽嘅國產車，而家喺馬路越來越多人，甚至份額超越咗合資。
根據乘聯會嘅數據，喺2026 年4 月，自主品牌嘅份額已經高達62.5%，遠超日系嘅13.1%。
要知道，中國汽車市場係全球最大嘅汽車市場，喺中國市場失速，就相當於丟咗一塊巨大嘅蛋糕。
同時，中國市場近年嚟嘅主旋律依舊係價格戰，捲配置、捲價格、捲服務已經成為一種常態，亦對日系車嘅利潤產生咗巨大嘅影響。
除咗中國，日系車喺美國過得亦唔太好。
2025 年 1 月 20 日，特朗普宣誓就職第 47 任美國總統，自此開啟咗一連串搞搞震，其中就包括以國家安全為理由徵收額外嘅汽車關稅，導致進口日本汽車嘅關稅稅率一度高達 27.5%，雖然後嚟有所降低，但亦遠高於最初嘅稅率。
呢個操作，直接導致七大日本車廠喺2025 財政年度嘅關稅損失超2 萬億日元。
再睇日本本土，其實亦唔容易。
中東地緣衝突導致霍爾木茲海峽航運受阻，運輸成本、原材料成本暴漲，日本車廠都有苦難言。
高管們看著報表，背後發涼，只能尋找全新嘅增長曲線。
所以，日本車廠唔係愛上印度，係冇地方去。
揀選印度嘅深思熟慮
咁，印度點解咁有魔力，先至令日本車廠重資投入呢？
第一個優勢就係大。喺2025 年，印度汽車市場取得咗551.7 萬輛嘅新車銷量，同比增長 6%，刷新咗歷史紀錄，位居全球第三大汽車市場，已经连续四年超越日本，僅次於中國同美國。
呢個含金量唔使多講啦，而印度取得呢一成績，主要係因為印度一直喺推動減稅政策，促進消費，這導致國內消費意願出現咗明顯增強。
第二個優點係近，就係離日系車賣得動嘅地方近，如非洲等其他地區。
所以，印度對於日本車廠，更似一個建喺十字路口中央嘅便利店，你唔使將車分別運去八個國家，只需要喺印度呢站造好，然後一船一船甩去，就能削減唔少成本。
《日本經濟新聞》亦認為，印度有望轉變為佢哋全球嘅汽車供應中心。
第三個優點係穩。要知道，日系車嘅優勢就係燃油車，畢竟引擎、變速箱、底盤三大件，佢哋已經玩咗好多年，技術積累喺全球都係數一數二。
但係中國汽車市場已經全力推動電動化、智能化發展，導致日系車嘅優勢越來越弱，根本無法發揮出嚟，但印度唔一樣，佢擁有充電樁少、電動化進程緩慢嘅特點，印度老百姓買車，都仲係盯住平、省油、易修，而呢三點正係日系車嘅老本行。
尤其係鈴木，一直係印度汽車市場嘅常青樹，幾乎年年穩坐暢銷車型寶座，口碑好，勝過任何廣告。
所以，日本車廠大力佈局印度市場，顯然是經過深思熟慮嘅。
但，印度市場真係咁好混咩？
難啃嘅印度市場
當然，印度亦唔係完美得似個香口格，佢嘅缺點同佢嘅優點一樣明顯，而且每一個都夠日本車廠喝一壺。
先講電動化，冇錯，眼睇下印度充電樁少、電動車賣唔動，確實係日系燃油車嘅避風港。但你得諗諗，呢個“避風港”能避幾耐？
印度此前可係喊出咗 2030 年電動車佔新車 30% 嘅口號，雖然聽落似吹水，但抵唔住人哋真補錢、真建充電站。
試諗下，萬一有日印度突然開竅，開始大力推動電動化、搞基建，充電樁似雨後春筍咁冒出來，嗰日系車唔就傻眼？
呢唔係泰國市場嘅翻版咩？
當年日系車喺泰國都係躺贏，整個東南亞市場，都被稱為日系車嘅後花園，結果泰國率先推動電動化，中國電動車一嚟，直接就成咗香口格，再睇日系車，喺泰國嘅市場份額嘩嘩嚟咗落。
如果印度係電動化一加速，歷史大概率會重演，而而家呢次，日系車連逃嘅地方都快冇咗，點樣預防，將成為日本車廠嘅首要問題。
再講政策，印度嘅政策就似一鍋咖哩，你永遠唔知下一口食到係雞肉定係馬鈴薯。
呢個魔幻嘅國家，今日係低關稅鼓勵建廠，明日就可能罰你一筆巨款，更令人頭痛嘅係強制合資，外國車廠想喺印度賣車，要搵本地夥伴搭檔，等你工廠建好咗、供應鏈搭完咗，印度直接背刺你，到嗰陣無論係加錢定撤資，換嚟嘅都係心痛。
所以你看，印度呢個市場，就好似一個睇落好甜嘅芒果，咬落去第一口仲行，再啃幾口就摸著硬核。
日系車而家嘅算盤係，趁住核都未硌牙，趕緊多啃幾口，但核遲早會硌到，只係唔知係邊一日。
尾聲
日系車呢趟印度之旅，唔係去旅遊，係去搵食。
中國同東南亞嘅飯桌更擁擠，生產、運輸嘅成本又提高咗，放眼全球，就印度呢口鍋仲冒住熱氣，哪怕入面煮嘅係咖哩味嘅石頭，都要硬著頭皮啃落去。
日本車廠想擴大市場，印度想嘅係拉動經濟、解決就業，雙方都有各自嘅心思。
至於結局係日系車喺印度重新封神，定係好似當年嘅部分友商一樣灰溜溜走人，那就唔知啦。
但無論點樣，呢場戲先至開始，我哋慢慢睇就得啦。
反正印度嘅故事，從來唔會悶。
買車預算 10 萬以內想揀部純電動 SUV，要想兼顧日常帶仔買餸同週末露營聚會，長安啟源全新 Q05 同零跑 A10 到底邊個更得？我相信呢個問題好多朋友都喺度諗緊，今日我哋唔係兜彎，直接搵埋佢哋兩個終端價錢都係 7 萬幾嘅兩個配置：長安啟源全新 Q05 2026 款 405 Max、零跑 A10 2026 款 505 悅享版，睇吓到底邊先係出行好拍檔？
買車這樣嘅大件，最重要係穩定可靠，咁電動車從邊度睇先算穩定可靠呢？品質、技術、三電係核心要素。品質方面雙方都算幾得，因為都係全球車，符合嚴苛嘅全球測試標準，長安啟源全新 Q05 已經喺 5 月泰國上市，唔久之後會進入更多海外國家。零跑 A10 預計今年第三季會進入歐洲市場，咁三電同技術點？
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
長安啟源全新 Q05 表現唔錯，配備咗寧德時代電芯同金鐘罩 2.0 3C 快充電池技術，同時底盤仲有護板，保護更好，平時如果係行唔平路面，釣魚露營嗰啲，唔使太擔心刮親底盤傷害電池。續航方面，呢部車滿電係 405km，當然佢亦有 506km 可選，而且都係寧德時代電芯，值得信賴。
（零跑 A10）
（零跑 A10）
零跑 A10 則配備來自江蘇正力或者國軒高科嘅電芯，屬於二線品牌，而佢則係用咗液冷技術，散熱快、夠安全，但係要一提嘅係零跑 A10 只有高配係液冷，低配則係風冷技術，散熱就冇咁得啦，而長安啟源全新 Q05 低配係直冷，散熱效果優於風冷，高配同樣用咗液冷散熱。續航方面呢部車有 505km，滿電可以跑得更遠一啲。簡單嚟講，就係同價來看長安啟源全新 Q05 電池係大廠更加可靠，零跑 A10 續航更長跑得遠，所以你係揀邊個呢？
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（零跑 A10）
接住嚟睇空間舒適性，呢部分差異幾大，長安啟源全新 Q05 係緊湊型 SUV，軸距 2735mm，零跑 A10 係小型 SUV，軸距 2605mm，落後 130mm。平時一個人、兩個人出街倒無乜，但如果三五好友、父母家人一齊出門就有分別啦。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
以身高 175cm 嘅成年男性做參考，分別進入 2 款 SUV 主駕並調好坐姿後，再嚟到第二排坐。呢個時候，體驗者喺長安啟源全新 Q05 嘅後排，頭頂同腿部空間分別仲可以餘低 1 拳同 2 拳，而且佢嘅後排靠背角度仲可以調節，長時間坐车能有唔同坐姿，可以緩解一啲疲勞感。同時，炎熱嘅夏天同寒冷嘅冬天，長安啟源全新 Q05 後排亦具備冷氣出風口，可以畀後排更好嘅乘坐體驗。
（零跑 A10）
（零跑 A10）
而體驗者喺零跑 A10 嘅後排，頭頂同腿部空間分別餘低 1 拳同 1 拳 3 指，座椅靠背角度比較細，亦都唔可以調節，長時間乘坐就會比較辛苦。但如果屋企有小寶寶嘅話，呢部小車好嘅係帶咗一塊小枱板，可以放玩具、平板，不過從安全出發，開車時並唔建議使用。
（零跑 A10）
再者嚟睇坐住舒唔舒服嘅問題，呢個價位 A10 畀嘅配置唔多，只有主駕電動調節同前排加熱，座椅貼合度亦都一般，日常代步肯定無問題，但喺車入面坐上一兩鍾頭嘅話都好攰。
（長安啟源全新 Q05）
長安啟源全新 Q05 則係前排都帶電動調節，主駕係最舒服嘅地方，頭枕、腰托、加熱、通風甚至係按摩功能全部都有，上班午休、露營開車累，直接放倒座椅躺低開啟按摩功能，半個鍾頭後即刻就可以恢復狀態。
而家買車智能科技肯定都唔可以落後，兩款車都係常規 L2 級輔助駕駛就無乜講，但座艙大有分別。零跑 A10 嘅 Leapmotor OS 系統生態都幾唔錯，卡片式佈局操作都簡單直接；長安啟源全新 Q05 則係天樞智能座艙，同樣絲滑流暢，而且比零跑 A10 多咗 Carlink、CarPlay 同榮耀互聯，對使用蘋果與榮耀手機嘅朋友嚟講更加友好，並且多出可見即可講功能，無需喚醒可以直接講出指令操作，使用更加方便。
總結：
一番對比落嚟，兩款車各有各嘅「殺手鐧」。零跑 A10 勝在續航夠長，而長安啟源全新 Q05 則更似一個「六邊形戰士」，寧德時代電芯 + 金鐘罩電池技術，品質令人放心；軸距多出 130mm，後排靠背可調節，多人出行更自由；再加上主駕通風按摩、可見即可講等配置，確實夠力。如果讓我揀，我會投長安啟源全新 Q05 一票，畢竟買咗之後日日都要開，對自已好一啲，抵過晒，你覺得點？
