首頁回收
搜尋歷史
熱門搜尋
經銷商登入 / 註冊
In Malaysia's SUV market, many buyers compare the Mazda CX-3 and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The Mazda CX-3's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 126,159 - 139,159, with a total of 2 versions, including 2023 2.0L High (RM 139,159), 2023 2.0L Plus (RM 126,159), etc.
The Chery Tiggo 8's OTR price in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the Mazda CX-3's starting price is indeed RM 3,591 cheaper than the Chery Tiggo 8. If your budget is limited, Mazda's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, also note that the savings of a few thousand might involve trade-offs in features, depending on your specific needs.
Mazda CX-3 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with 1.5L Turbo, 140 hp. Official fuel consumption 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, the driving feel in daily use is basically the same. Fuel consumption is also similar, no need to worry too much about this.
Mazda CX-3's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include i-Activsense.
Chery Tiggo 8's safety rating is TBD, active safety systems include Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars received decent ratings. However, there are some differences in functionality between Mazda CX-3's i-Activsense and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety more, you can compare their feature lists in detail.
Mazda CX-3 warranty is 5 years/150,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty is 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
In general, both Mazda CX-3 and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. We recommend doing your homework, comparing quotes from several car dealers, and then test driving to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, spending some time on research will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿豐田 Fortuner 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做個詳細嘅比較，幫你省做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等等。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 336,888 - 336,888，一共有 2 個版本，包括 GLC 200（RM 290,000）、GLC 300（RM 340,000） 等等。
從價錢嚟睇，豐田 Fortuner 嘅起步價真係比 Mercedes-Benz GLC 平咗 RM 141,008。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要注意，平嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
豐田 Fortuner 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 搭載 2.0L Turbo，馬力 220 hp。官方油耗 9.5 L/100km。
動力方面，Mercedes-Benz GLC 嘅 2.0L Turbo 比豐田 Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 多咗 33 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
豐田 Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
豐田 Fortuner 保修 5 年/無限里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Mercedes-Benz GLC 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
豐田 Fortuner 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭使用、日常通勤。如果你更睇重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更豐富嗰款。始終都建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要。
總體嚟講，豐田 Fortuner 同 Mercedes-Benz GLC 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好做功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去做試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
苏州2026年10月15日 /美通社/ -- 10月15日，DEKRA德凯苏州检测中心在吴江经济技术开发区正式落成并投入运营。这座超12,000平方米的现代化检测中心，是DEKRA德凯深耕中国市场、完善本土服务网络的重要举措之一。全新的测试中心聚焦新能源汽车、信息技术设备、多媒体产品、医疗电气设备、智能装备、新能源电力电子及储能等前沿领域，面向产业链上下游企业提供检测、认证及技术支持服务，以专业力量助力企业提升产品品质，加速开拓全球市场。
苏州市吴江区委副书记、区长曹晔，吴江区委常委、吴江经开区党工委副书记、管委会副主任方勇，吴江经开区党工委委员、管委会副主任朱云根，DEKRA德凯集团董事会主席兼首席执行官Stan Zurkiewicz，集团执行副总裁、亚太区总裁Kilian Aviles博士，亚太区高级副总裁、中国大陆及香港董事总经理吴航军，中国高科技和高低压服务副总裁冯剑波等嘉宾出席落成仪式，共同见证这一重要时刻。
苏州是中国最具创新活力的产业高地之一，也是长三角世界级城市群的重要节点，制造业基础扎实，新能源汽车、智能装备等产业加速集群。这种产业土壤，决定了DEKRA德凯苏州检测中心的战略意义。与此同时，长三角一体化发展不断深化，创新要素加速流动，苏州及吴江正从"制造基地"向"智造高地"和"创新策源地"跃升。检验检测认证作为连接研发、制造、贸易和市场的关键生产性服务业，既是产品质量与安全的"守门人"，也是企业出海和产业升级的"加速器"。产业链上下游对高水平检测认证、合规准入和全球市场拓展服务的需求持续增长。
在落成仪式上，DEKRA德凯集团董事会主席兼首席执行官Stan Zurkiewicz表示："苏州检测中心的启用，是DEKRA德凯持续深化中国市场布局的重要里程碑。中国是全球创新最活跃的市场之一。通过持续加大本地能力建设投入，我们将进一步夯实在未来出行、数字信任和可持续发展领域的技术服务能力，帮助企业提升产品安全性、可靠性和市场竞争力，共同推动行业创新与高质量发展。" 他强调，DEKRA德凯自1925年成立以来，始终以安全为基石，百年口号"SECURING THE FUTURE"正说明安全不是进步的约束，而是进步赖以扎根的基础。
DEKRA德凯集团执行副总裁、亚太区总裁Kilian Aviles博士表示："苏州检测中心不仅是一项重要的战略投资，更体现了DEKRA德凯扎根中国、服务亚太市场的坚定承诺。立足产业创新前沿、贴近客户实际需求，我们将持续提升区域服务能力，为企业提供高效可靠的测试认证支持，帮助客户加速创新成果落地，共同迈向更加安全、智能和可持续的未来。"
DEKRA德凯早在2004年便落户苏州，最初只是拥有数十名核心员工、专注消费电子检测的实验室，如今业务已拓展至汽车、高端制造及工业领域。中国及亚太地区创新步伐持续加快，电动汽车、物联网、智能家居、人工智能、工业数字化与可持续解决方案加速融合，企业在安全、质量、网络安全、互操作性、合规与市场准入等方面面临更高要求。DEKRA德凯苏州检测中心正是为帮助企业应对这些挑战而建，通过先进检测能力与全球专家网络，助力创新企业完成合规验证、提升产品品质、缩短上市周期、筑牢市场信任。
苏州市吴江区委常委、吴江经开区党工委副书记、管委会副主任方勇在致辞中对DEKRA德凯苏州检测中心的正式启用表示祝贺，并高度肯定了DEKRA德凯长期以来在质量与安全领域的专业贡献。方勇表示："DEKRA德凯苏州检测中心的启用，不仅是DEKRA德凯深耕中国市场的重要里程碑，也将为长三角地区相关产业提供更完善的测试认证服务支撑。希望DEKRA德凯充分发挥国际检验检测认证机构的技术优势，为区域产业高质量发展和国际化进程提供有力支持。吴江将继续以开放包容的营商环境支持企业发展，与DEKRA德凯携手推动产业创新升级。"
在他看来，DEKRA德凯的落户恰逢其时，将帮助本地企业降低检测认证成本、缩短研发周期、提升产品竞争力，也将进一步增强吴江经开区吸引和承载高质量项目的能力，助力构建更具韧性和竞争力的现代产业体系。
随着苏州检测中心正式投入运营，DEKRA德凯在中国的本地化服务能力迈上新的台阶。依托全球领先的技术实力、国际化资源网络和深厚的行业经验，DEKRA德凯将持续赋能新能源汽车、电子电气、新能源及先进制造等产业发展，助力更多中国创新加速走向世界，为构建更加安全、智能和可持续的未来贡献专业力量。
From the light and electricity of data centers to cars and humanoid robots, this foundry bets on everything beyond computing power.
In the past two years, when talking about AI, one cannot bypass GPUs.
On September 22, during the GlobalFoundries Technology Summit (GTS), Shankaran Janardhanan, Senior Vice President of GlobalFoundries' Photonics and RF Business, gave another judgment: "The bottleneck limiting AI development is no longer computing power, but connectivity and power supply."
GlobalFoundries has its stance in saying this. As early as 2018, this wafer foundry paused 7-nanometer R&D and withdrew from the competition for advanced processes. It does not make GPUs, nor does it compete for 3-nanometer or 2-nanometer, but instead bets on everything beyond computing power: who will do the sensing, control, and low-power computing needed when AI enters the real world, how data is transmitted out, and how power is delivered in.
That day, five senior executives from the China region, Asia-Pacific, and global business took turns on stage. Topics ranged from cars all the way to data centers and humanoid robots. The scene span is not small, but upon closer inspection, GlobalFoundries is always solving two things: connectivity and power supply.
Let's start with cars.
01.
Cars: Car numbers haven't increased much, but chip numbers have
"For any technical roundtable or summit, it is incomplete not to talk about cars in China." Faisal Saleem, Global Senior Vice President of GlobalFoundries, said right from the start.
Faisal Saleem, Global Senior Vice President of GlobalFoundries
He summarized four changes happening in the automotive industry. First, cars are getting "smarter", sensing the surrounding environment stronger, and there are more connections between car parts, cars and people, and cars and clouds. Second, software-defined cars, functions can be opened, closed, and upgraded remotely, hundreds of MCUs that were scattered across the whole car in the past are being replaced by regional architectures. Third, electrification, over half of new cars in China are some form of electric vehicles, behind which is a fundamental change in the whole vehicle power architecture. Fourth, supply chain resilience, after experiencing chip shortages, automakers need both local supply chains and global supply chains as a backup.
Faisal also mentioned a set of interesting numbers. Over the past five years, the number of cars using GlobalFoundries chips has hardly changed; what changed is that there are more and more chips on each car, and they continue to increase.
Where do the extra chips come from? Cameras, LiDAR, millimeter-wave radar, ultrasound, and cockpit sensors continuously generate data, these data need to be processed and transmitted. Thus, domain sensors, regional sensors, network chips, Ethernet chips, SerDes, and power management chips are all increasing. In the end, it is still "connection" and "power".
After there are more chips, new problems start to appear, which is "no single process can handle everything".
Millimeter-wave radar transceivers and battery monitoring chips have completely different process requirements. In Faisal's view, dedicated process platforms will become increasingly important: FDX (FD-SOI) for low power and RF, BCD for battery management, Gallium Nitride for power.
Additionally, in terms of competitiveness, the core selling point of automotive chips is trust
"Customers buying cars are buying not just technology, but more of a kind of trust." Faisal said. A car needs to drive for 10 years, 15 years, or even 20 years, often working under extreme temperatures, so quality and reliability are the first priority. GlobalFoundries built the AutoPro platform for this, integrating automotive requirements into every link of design, process, PDK, IP, and manufacturing operations.
GlobalFoundries has done automotive for over 15 years, processes cover 180 nanometers to FinFET. In Faisal's words, "Without exaggeration, I can say there is not a single automaker whose cars do not carry our products".
SVP of Asia Pacific Manufacturing and Singapore Site and General Manager Chen Yaoguang
Trust ultimately needs to be redeemed by factories. Over 40% of the annual production capacity of GlobalFoundries' Singapore site is automotive-grade products. Chen Yaoguang, SVP of Asia Pacific Manufacturing and Singapore Site and General Manager, shared the factory's performance in manufacturing quality, production efficiency, and delivery reliability, demonstrating GlobalFoundries' emphasis on automotive chip quality and stable supply.
When talking about AI in cars, GlobalFoundries China President Hu Weiduo believes the core inside cars is still MCU, this is also the direction GlobalFoundries is heavily investing in domestically. Computing power needs to be improved, power efficiency needs to be improved, but "the foundation is still stability, reliability, and security as the key pillars for all automotive-related products".
GlobalFoundries China President Hu Weiduo
02.
Cloud: Same challenges, magnified by several orders of magnitude
From cars to data centers, what GlobalFoundries faces is actually the same question: power is getting larger, electricity and data are getting harder to deliver. It's just that at AI data centers, the order of magnitude has multiplied several times over.
In terms of power, the trend is from 48V to 800V.
Shankaran summarized the changes in data center power supply into three points: higher current density, voltage rises to 800V high voltage DC, higher power density. This is the same principle as cars going from 12V to 48V. When power goes up, one must rely on increasing voltage to lower current and loss.
The trouble lies in that these things restrict each other. Data needs to be transmitted further and faster, power supply must be closer to the rack. GlobalFoundries' trump card here is BCD, Gallium Nitride and other power and power platforms, which are the processes already used in cars.
In terms of communication connectivity, the trend is copper retreats optics advance.
The pressure on connectivity is greater. Data centers are moving from single rack to multi-rack interconnection, GPUs to be connected go from dozens to hundreds or thousands. Single channel rate has gone from 100G to 200G, next is 400G; power consumption needs to be compressed to below 5 pJ per bit.
Shankaran divides interconnection into three layers. Vertical scaling (scale-up) within racks or clusters, copper cables have fallen behind bandwidth needs, currently "copper retreats optics advance"; horizontal scaling (scale-out) between racks and clusters, and cross-data-center, cross-campus cross-domain scaling (scale-across), was originally the realm of light. In terms of form, the current mainstream is pluggable optical modules and NPO (Near-Package Optics), next step is CPO (Co-Packaged Optics).
This is the area GlobalFoundries is most confident in. Its silicon photonics and silicon germanium (SiGe) technologies are both mass-produced, among which 200G/λ has been shipped, 400G/λ and above are in R&D, the roadmap also includes 12-inch silicon photonics. Previously, GlobalFoundries also acquired Singapore silicon photonics foundry AMF. According to Chen Yaoguang, if only pure silicon photonics revenue is counted, GlobalFoundries is already number one globally.
As light and electricity get closer, the final competition is heterogeneous integration, which happens to be where GlobalFoundries is still catching up. Chen Yaoguang said very frankly: "Advanced packaging is a field where we still need to further expand capabilities. We have already completed half, there is more work to do".
In the parts already achieved, TSV (Through-Silicon Via) has been in mass production since 2014, SLATE wafer-to-wafer (W2W) hybrid bonding also has mass production capability. In the future, GlobalFoundries also plans to further promote chip-to-wafer (D2W) hybrid bonding technology, and explore integration with Gallium Nitride and silicon photonics technologies.
03.
Humans: Car foundation, plus AI brain
"Data centers will have further growth, and artificial intelligence will step out of data centers, enter the real world to promote physical AI development." Those who said this are MIPS CEO Sameer Wasson, MIPS is now a company under GlobalFoundries.
Sameer sees physical AI as a closed loop: Perception, Thinking, Action, Communication. GlobalFoundries' next investment will revolve around these four links.
Humanoid robots are the most complete sample of this closed loop. GlobalFoundries gave two numbers at the summit : The semiconductor usage of a humanoid robot is 3 to 4 times that of a car; to achieve dexterity operations close to humans, more than 40 degrees of freedom are needed.
However, if you break down the robot usage, it is still the car set.
Perception relies on vision, acoustics, LiDAR, millimeter-wave radar, and motion position sensors; Thinking relies on multi-modal AI and sensor fusion, requiring low latency; Action relies on efficient, precise actuators and motor control; Energy relies on battery management and power management chips.
This list is almost no difference from a smart electric vehicle's chip list. Even the architecture thinking is the same, GlobalFoundries labeled for humanoid robots "Distributed Intelligence and Regionalized Architecture", and cars are walking the same road.
Chen Yaoguang also pointed out this point when answering automotive-related questions: "The MCUs we focus on are used not only for electric vehicles, but also for humanoid robots." High voltage BCD processes are the same. He also specially mentioned, humanoid robots need to deal with humans daily, safety is very important. And safety is exactly what the automotive system has polished for over ten years.
GlobalFoundries doesn't make GPUs, but makes "small brains".
The biggest difference between physical AI and data centers lies in the "Thinking" link. Sameer believes, large GPUs, NPUs will certainly still exist, but future systems will move more towards distributed intelligence, the physical world needs large amounts of distributed, extremely low-power intelligence.
He gave an example: "Motor control is not a fresh thing, but if it is driven by generative AI or AI, this is a new thing."
This also explains why GlobalFoundries wanted to acquire MIPS. After buying MIPS last year, in the past 12 months GlobalFoundries also acquired ARC processor IP, Sameer described "our capabilities doubled".
Based on these IPs, GlobalFoundries launched three computing reference platforms: Inference-native Acies, adopting 100% RISC-V architecture; Automotive and Robot real-time applications Actus, based on FDX process and Arm; and Security-native CPU Aegis, also 100% RISC-V.
Behind this is the expansion of customer boundaries. Sameer stated, chip design companies are still GlobalFoundries' important customers, but the company is also expanding its customer group to Tier 1 suppliers, extending the value chain backward.
A pure wafer foundry starting to provide CPU IP and reference platforms is not common in the industry. GlobalFoundries bets on: in the physical AI era, whoever can integrate computing, sensing, and power supply at the lowest cost will get more designs.
Epilogue: Placing a Move in Guangzhou
Cars, Cloud, Humans three scenarios span a large range, GlobalFoundries puts out is the same set of assets: FDX, BCD, Gallium Nitride, RF, and silicon photonics these differentiated processes, heterogeneous integration capability that seals them together, MIPS and ARC brought proprietary IP, and factories distributed in multiple places.
The last item is especially urgent for Chinese customers. Chen Yaoguang gave an example, 40 nanometer, 55 nanometer processes can be produced at factories in Singapore and Dresden, Germany, customers changing factories do not need to design and verify from scratch. Now, on this map there is one more point: Guangzhou.
Early in September, GlobalFoundries established an office in Guangzhou, and cooperated with Guangzhou Zengxin Technology. From the information disclosed at the summit, Zengxin is GlobalFoundries' manufacturing partner, providing customers with "China for China" capacity choice; technology transfer is led by GlobalFoundries Singapore, initially focusing on the automotive field.
When answering questions, Faisal said, automotive electronics is one of the fields with relatively clear localization demands, customers all hope to "have both a global supply plan and a local supply plan". This article starts with cars, GlobalFoundries' move in China also starts with cars.
Hu Weiduo said a sentence at the start of the communication meeting: "You can see in semiconductor nodes that behind the numbers there are differentiated functions and performance." Outside the GPU spotlight, chips needed by AI are far more than computing power chips, what GlobalFoundries wants to do is exactly these.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿豐田 Fortuner 同名爵 MG HS 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Fortuner 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 195,880 - 241,880，總共有 3 個版本，包括 2024 2.8T VRZ Diesel（RM 241,880）、2024 2.7L SRZ Petrol（RM 202,880）、2024 2.4L Standard Diesel（RM 195,880） 等。
名爵 MG HS 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 130,450 - 146,450，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard（RM 105,000）、1.5L Executive（RM 115,000） 等。
由價錢睇，名爵 MG HS 嘅起步價比豐田 Fortuner 平咗 RM 65,430。實話講，喺呢個價位段，幾千蚊嘅差距其實唔算大，關鍵仲係睇整體嘅性價比同長期使用成本。
豐田 Fortuner 搭載 2.5L Diesel，馬力 187 hp。官方油耗 8.5 L/100km。
名爵 MG HS 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，豐田 Fortuner 嘅 2.5L Diesel 比名爵 MG HS 嘅 1.5L Turbo 多咗 47 匹馬力，中段加速更有信心，尤其係跑高速公路超車嘅時候。不過名爵 MG HS 嘅油耗可能更加親切，日常市區通勤差異唔會太大。
豐田 Fortuner 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
名爵 MG HS 嘅安全評級係 TBD，主動安全系統包括 Basic。
豐田 Fortuner 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
名爵 MG HS 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
豐田 Fortuner 同名爵 MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用途、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌聲譽同二手價，可以優先考慮聲譽更好嗰款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，那就揀配置更加豐富嗰款。還係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先係最重要嘅。
總體嚟講，豐田 Fortuner 同名爵 MG HS 都係馬來西亞市場幾不錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係要看你嘅個人需求同預算。建議各位做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Toyota Corolla Cross and Mercedes-Benz GLA when choosing a car. These two cars are quite close in price and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save time on research.
The OTR price for Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
The OTR price for Mercedes-Benz GLA in Malaysia is RM 258,888 - 295,888, with a total of 1 version, including Standard (RM 258,888), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Toyota Corolla Cross is indeed RM 125,088 cheaper than Mercedes-Benz GLA. If your budget is limited, Toyota's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. However, you should also note that the savings of a few thousand might mean compromises on features, which depends on your specific needs.
The safety rating for Toyota Corolla Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
The safety rating for Mercedes-Benz GLA is 5★ (Euro NCAP), and the active safety system includes Premium ADAS.
In terms of safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, there are some functional differences between Toyota Corolla Cross's TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA) and Mercedes-Benz GLA's Premium ADAS. If you prioritize active safety, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Toyota Corolla Cross comes with a 5-year/unlimited mileage warranty, with maintenance intervals of every 10,000km or 6 months.
Mercedes-Benz GLA comes with a 3-year/100,000km warranty, with maintenance intervals of every 10,000km or 6 months.
Both Toyota Corolla Cross and Mercedes-Benz GLA are mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use and daily commuting. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about cost-performance ratio and features, choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, as personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Toyota Corolla Cross and Mercedes-Benz GLA are both very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose ultimately depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, and then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a big deal, taking time to do research will never be wrong.
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Toyota Corolla Cross and Chery Tiggo 8 when choosing a car. Both vehicles are quite close in price and positioning. Today we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to help you save research time.
The OTR price of Toyota Corolla Cross in Malaysia is RM 133,800 - 148,800, with a total of 3 versions, including 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport (RM 148,800), 2026 HEV 1.8L Standard (RM 140,800), 2026 1.8L Standard (RM 133,800), etc.
The OTR price of Chery Tiggo 8 in Malaysia is RM 129,750 - 129,750, with a total of 1 version, including 2026 1.6T Standard (RM 129,750), etc.
From a price perspective, the starting price of Chery Tiggo 8 is RM 4,050 cheaper than Toyota Corolla Cross. Honestly, in this price range, the gap of a few thousand is actually not significant. The key lies in the overall cost-performance ratio and long-term usage costs.
The Toyota Corolla Cross is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
The Chery Tiggo 8 is equipped with a 1.5L Turbo, with 140 hp. Official fuel consumption is 7.0 L/100km.
Both cars use the same powertrain system, and the driving experience in daily use is basically no difference. The fuel consumption is also about the same, so there is no need to worry too much about this point.
The safety rating of Toyota Corolla Cross is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), and the active safety system includes TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA).
The safety rating of Chery Tiggo 8 is TBD, and the active safety system includes Basic.
In terms of safety features, both cars have achieved good ratings. However, there are some differences in function between Toyota Corolla Cross's TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA) and Chery Tiggo 8's Basic. If you value active safety highly, you can compare the function lists of both in detail.
The Toyota Corolla Cross body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The Chery Tiggo 8 body length is 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, and the interior space difference is not significant. For cars in this class, daily use is completely sufficient.
Toyota Corolla Cross warranty 5 years/unlimited mileage, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Chery Tiggo 8 warranty 3 years/100,000km, maintenance interval every 10,000km or 6 months.
Overall, both Toyota Corolla Cross and Chery Tiggo 8 are very good models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends mainly on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended that you do your research, compare quotes from multiple car dealerships, and then test drive to make the final decision. Buying a car is a big matter, spending some time researching will never go wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿豐田 Yaris Cross 同馬自達 CX-5 做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你省卻做功課嘅時間。
豐田 Yaris Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 99,900 - 109,900，一共有 2 個版本，包括 2026 1.5L Standard（RM 99,900）、2026 HEV 1.5L Standard（RM 109,900） 等。
馬自達 CX-5 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 135,469 - 166,760，一共有 3 個版本，包括 2025 2.0L AT 35th Anniversary（RM 316,154）、2025 2.0L AT（RM 296,154）、2025 2.0L MT（RM 294,154） 等。
從價錢嚟睇，豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅起步價確實比馬自達 CX-5 平咗 RM 35,569。如果你預算有限，豐田嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需求。但都要留意，平嘅嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體要睇你嘅需求。
豐田 Yaris Cross 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
馬自達 CX-5 搭載 1.5L Turbo，馬力 140 hp。官方油耗 7.0 L/100km。
動力方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅 1.5L Turbo 比豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 35 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
豐田 Yaris Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS。
馬自達 CX-5 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算畀得好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都唔錯，唔使太擔心這一點。
豐田 Yaris Cross 車身長 4400 mm，尾箱 400 L。
馬自達 CX-5 車身長 4500 mm，尾箱 450 L。
空間方面，馬自達 CX-5 嘅車身比豐田 Yaris Cross 長咗 100 mm，乘坐空間更有優勢。不過豐田 Yaris Cross 喺城市入面停車會靈活啲，各有取舍。
豐田 Yaris Cross 保修 5 年/無限制里程，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
馬自達 CX-5 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
總體嚟講，豐田 Yaris Cross 同馬自達 CX-5 都係馬來西亞市場好唔錯嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵都要睇你嘅個人需求同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕做最終決定。買車係件大事，花點時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多人揀車嗰陣都會拿寶騰 X70 同豐田 Corolla Cross 嚟做比較。這兩款車喺價位同定位上都好接近，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細比較，幫你省返做功課嘅時間。
寶騰 X70 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 106,800 - 122,300，合共有 3 個版本，包括 1.5L Standard 2WD（RM 106,800）、1.5L Executive 2WD（RM 115,800）、1.5L Premium 2WD（RM 122,300） 等。
豐田 Corolla Cross 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 133,800 - 148,800，合共有 3 個版本，包括 2026 HEV 1.8L GR Sport（RM 148,800）、2026 HEV 1.8L Standard（RM 140,800）、2026 1.8L Standard（RM 133,800） 等。
睇落價錢，寶騰 X70 嘅起步價的確比豐田 Corolla Cross 便宜咗 RM 27,000。如果你預算有限，寶騰嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過都要留意，平啲嗰幾千蚊，可能喺配備上會有取舍，具體睇你嘅需要。
寶騰 X70 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA)。
豐田 Corolla Cross 嘅安全評級係 5★ (ASEAN NCAP)，主動安全系統包括 TSS (PCS, LDA, ACC, LTA)。
兩款車嘅安全評級一樣，喺呢個級別入面安全配備都算好齊全。而家嘅新車安全性都好，唔使太擔心呢一點。
寶騰 X70 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
豐田 Corolla Cross 車身長 4400 mm，後備箱 400 L。
兩款車嘅尺寸幾乎一樣，車內空間差別唔大。呢個級別嘅車，日常使用完全夠用。
寶騰 X70 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
豐田 Corolla Cross 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
兩款車嘅驅動方式一樣，都係 FWD，日常駕駛感受唔會有太大分別。
總括嚟講，寶騰 X70 同豐田 Corolla Cross 都係馬來西亞市場好正嘅車型。揀邊一輛，關鍵仲係睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做足功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，先至去試駕做最後決定。買車係件大事情，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
In the Malaysian SUV market, many buyers compare the Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV when choosing a car. Both cars are quite close in price range and positioning. Today, we will make a detailed comparison from multiple aspects to save you time doing research.
Proton X50 in Malaysia's OTR price is RM 89,800 - 113,300, there are a total of 4 versions, including 1.5T Executive (RM 89,800), 1.5T Premium (RM 101,800), 1.5T Flagship (RM 113,300), etc.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV in Malaysia's OTR price is RM 129,750 - 129,750, there are a total of 2 versions, including 2025 1.5T 90km CSH (RM 129,750), What charging methods does the Tiggo 7 PHEV support? Can it be charged using a home power socket? (RM 117,478), etc.
From the price perspective, Proton X50's starting price is indeed RM 39,950 cheaper than Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV. If your budget is limited, Proton's entry-level version can already meet daily needs. But also note, the cheaper few thousand, might have trade-offs in features, it depends on your specific needs.
Proton X50 is equipped with 1.5L 4-cyl, 105 hp. Official fuel consumption 6.0 L/100km.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV is equipped with Hybrid, 170 hp. Official fuel consumption 4.5 L/100km.
In terms of power, Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Hybrid has 65 hp more than Proton X50's 1.5L 4-cyl. However, for daily city driving, both cars' power is sufficient, you won't feel underpowered.
Proton X50's safety rating is 5★ (ASEAN NCAP), active safety systems include ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA).
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's safety rating is TBD, active safety system includes Basic.
Regarding safety features, both cars have received decent ratings. However, Proton X50's ADAS (ACC, AEB, LKA, LDA, BSM, RCTA) and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV's Basic differ somewhat in functionality. If you value active safety more, you can compare the feature lists of both carefully.
Proton X50 body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV body length 4400 mm, trunk 400 L.
The dimensions of both cars are almost the same, interior space difference is not significant. For this class of cars, daily use is completely sufficient.
Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both mainstream choices in the Malaysian market, suitable for family use, daily commute. If you value brand reputation and resale value more, you can prioritize the one with better reputation; if you care more about value for money and features, then choose the one with richer configuration. Ultimately, it is recommended to test drive both, personal experience is the most important.
Overall, Proton X50 and Chery Tiggo 7 PHEV are both very good car models in the Malaysian market. Which one to choose depends on your personal needs and budget. It is recommended to do your homework, compare quotes from several car dealerships, then test drive to make a final decision. Buying a car is a major event, spending time doing homework will never be wrong.
喺馬來西亞嘅 SUV 市場，好多買家喺揀車嘅時候都會拿 Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嚟做比較。呢兩款車喺價位同定位上都幾接近嘅，今日我哋就從多個方面做一個詳細嘅對比，幫你節省做功課嘅時間。
Proton X50 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 89,800 - 113,300，總共有 4 個版本，包括 1.5T Executive（RM 89,800）、1.5T Premium（RM 101,800）、1.5T Flagship（RM 113,300）等等。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 喺馬來西亞嘅 OTR 售價係 RM 159,750 - 159,750，總共有 2 個版本，包括 1.6L Turbo Standard（RM 130,000）、1.6L Turbo Premium（RM 145,000）等等。
由價錢睇，Proton X50 嘅起價確實比 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 平咗 RM 69,950。如果你預算有限，Proton 嘅入門版已經可以滿足日常需要。不過亦都要留意，平嗰幾千塊，可能喺配備上有取舍，具體要看你嘅需求。
Proton X50 搭載 1.5L 4-cyl，馬力 105 hp。官方油耗 6.0 L/100km。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 搭載 2.0L 4-cyl，馬力 170 hp。官方油耗 8.0 L/100km。
動力方面，Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 嘅 2.0L 4-cyl 比 Proton X50 嘅 1.5L 4-cyl 多咗 65 匹馬力。不過日常喺市區開，兩款車嘅動力都夠用，唔會覺得唔夠力。
Proton X50 採用 4WD 驅動方式。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 採用 FWD 驅動方式。
Proton 嘅 4WD 同 Chery 嘅 FWD 喺操控上會有唔同嘅感覺，建議試駕對比。
Proton X50 保修 5 年/150,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 保修 3 年/100,000km，保養間隔 每 10,000km 或 6 個月。
Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場嘅主流選擇，適合家庭用、日常通勤。如果你更看重品牌口碑同二手價，可以優先考慮口碑更好嗰一款；如果你更在意性價比同配備，就揀配備更豐富嗰款。最終都係建議兩款都去試駕，親身體驗先至係最重要嘅。
總括嚟講，Proton X50 同 Chery Tiggo 8 Pro 都係馬來西亞市場幾唔錯嘅車款。揀邊一輛，關鍵始終都要睇你嘅個人需要同預算。建議大家做好功課，多比較幾間車行嘅報價，再去試駕先做最終決定。買車係件大事，花少少時間做功課絕對唔會錯。
